ipl-logo

Impact Of The Missouri Compromise

969 Words4 Pages

What impact did the Missouri Compromise have on future territories and their entrance to the union? To understand the Missouri Compromise fully, understanding the events that took place prior to 1820 is essential. The War of 1812 ended with “the Federalist Party all but destroyed.” After the fall of the federalist party, we entered a time period called the Era of Good Feelings. It received this name “due to the one-party dominance” . The party dominating the political elections and the U.S Congress was the Democratic-Republicans also referred to as the Jeffersonian Republicans. The Era of Good Feelings was a happy time in America because there wasn’t much political tension throughout the population because the lone single party, the Democratic-Republicans, …show more content…

Being “the first great Congressional compromise over the slavery issue” , the Compromise was very important because it set a precedent that Congress can dictate and regulate slavery in new territories entering the Union. This might not have seemed like a very big issue at the time, but a few decades later this became a very hot topic for debate. The Missouri Compromise was always a solution that just postponed the Civil War, the war was inevitable. Without everyone being in agreement over the issue of slavery, there would always be tensions between states. The Missouri Compromise was abolished in 1854 when the Kansas-Nebraska Act was introduced. The Kansas-Nebraska Act removed the provision that slavery would not extend north of the 36-30 line. The Missouri Compromise seemed to settle the issue of slavery at the time being, but it’s true issues still were on the road for civil outbreak in the future. “Further compromises and Supreme Court decisions would play a role in the great debates” over slavery and weather it should be completely abolished. Many people had feared the Missouri Compromise would break apart the union, but majority of the population had not recognized these threats for another four decades when Civil War unleased between the union and the Confederacy where the issue of slavery was ultimately

Show More
Related

  • Summary: The Missouri Compromise Unravels

    105 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise Unravels was a debate between slavery which congress had no power over to control. They eventually settle on an antislavery pension called the GAG rule to keep any slavery topics off the table. It 's important because Northerners wanted to keep slavery out of the growing nation and Southerners wanted to keep their property and get more money from their slaves. They fought for the new land and what to do with it and causing congress to deadlock California and there appeal for statehood. The South was not happy about California becoming a free state and eventually think about withdrawing from the

    Read More

  • Explaining The Kansas-Nebraska Act Of 1854

    89 Words  | 1 Pages

    Also, I will be explaining what the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was. January of 1854 Sen. Stephen Douglas wrote a bill that would divide the land in the west of Missouri into two states Nebraska and Kansas. Douglas wanted popular sovereignty for both states; this would allow the residents of the two states to vote on if slavery would be legal in new states. Groups against slavery were against Douglas’s push for popular sovereignty, because without the ability to vote slavery would not be allowed in the new

    Read More

  • Als Before The Events Of The Missouri Compromise

    1891 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise however had effects larger than simply distributing the land. The Missouri Compromise would further prevent a larger conflict between the north, and south in the immediate future. This made both sides even more restless to fight for their respective causes. The compromise

    Read More

  • Dbq Missouri Compromise

    595 Words  | 3 Pages

    Leslie Chihuahua United States History to 1877 11/13/2015 11:00-11:50 AM Missouri Compromise was an agreement from the House of Representatives to reach a median to keep slavery out of Missouri after all the tribulations it had caused before it became a state. Henry Clay, Speaker of the House made important decisions in order for Missouri to be admitted as a state that could impact American history. In 1819, slavery was a resourceful profit to slave owners and this sparked a sectional controversy in the country over the efforts to expand slavery into the new western territories. The country had 22 states, eleven free eleven slave, and the line between them were distinguished by the northern and western boundaries of Pennsylvania and the Ohio River. (Txt.

    Read More

  • Henry Clay's Role In The Missouri Compromise

    530 Words  | 3 Pages

    Missouri Compromise The Missouri Compromise was the effort of Congress to end the sectional and political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri late in 1819 for admission as a state in which slavery would be permitted. The Missouri Compromise happened in 1820. It is important because Congress passed a bill granting Missouri statehood as a slave state under the condition that it was to be forever prohibited in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase. Henry Clay, John Quincy Adams, and James Tallmadge were involved in the Missouri Compromise.

    Read More

  • The Missouri Compromise: The Fire Of War

    139 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was definite attempt by the government to shove the issue out of view. By the time the Missouri Compromise was introduced, a few northern states were already in the process of abolishing slavery, as was England. The government was finally recognizing the cruelties of slavery but did not want to anger the southern plantation owners. Thus, they created the Missouri Compromise in order to ease their guilt and face the least contempt. The Missouri Compromise was only able to increase the brewing conflict of slavery between northern states and southern states.

    Read More

  • Why Did The South Win The Civil War Research Paper

    1985 Words  | 8 Pages

    To please the South, slavery would be prohibited forever from Louisiana Purchase territories n orth of 36° 30'. Southern extremists opposed any limit on the extension of slavery, but settled for now. Missouri and Maine were to enter statehood simultaneously to preserve sectional equality in the Senate. For almost a generation this Compromise seemed to settle the conflict between the North and South. But in 1848 the Union acquired a huge piece of territory from Mexico.

    Read More

  • Was The Compromise Of 1850 Justified To Delay The Civil War

    1168 Words  | 5 Pages

    It is the fact that even though both the northern states and the southern states did not agree issue, they manage to come to peace until both sides could not come to peace anymore. Both the compromise and Kansas Nebraska act although did have bloody consequences it was the thin string that slavery was tearing apart. The tension between the north and south was slowly intensifying, but this act did maintain the country

    Read More

  • The Missouri Compromise: Cause Of The Civil War

    808 Words  | 4 Pages

    The House of Representatives narrowly approved gradual manumission 80 Northern votes to 14 while the South object just two votes to 64. But the slave states had greater strength in the Senate; besides, three of the four senators from Illinois and Indiana reflected the sentiment of settlers from the South and voted against the amendment. The Senate refused to accept any restriction on slavery and that was the reason that led to the Missouri compromise. Many of the senate leaders worked behind the scenes to create a compromise and break the dead end.

    Read More

  • What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    1122 Words  | 5 Pages

    These were a big deal involving slavery because they either strengthened slavery or made it seem like it was going to end all together. To the South, the thought of slavery ending was a complete disaster. In Document 9: Excerpt from the Dred Scott Decision, shows how Scott saw the Missouri Compromise. He says, “(I)t is the opinion of this court that the Act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind (slaves) in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned,...” This quote from his speech says he thinks that the Missouri Compromise was a good thing because it prohibited people who own slaves to cross the North and South border with their “property” or slaves.

    Read More

  • Essay On Missouri Compromise

    771 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise has just been signed by our President, James Monroe. The Missouri Compromise is a compromise my Congress that admits Missouri as a slave state, which would have upsets the delicate balance of free states to slave states in the Senate. In order to balance out the slave states to Free states, land is carved from Massachusetts in the north to form the state of Maine. So the Compromise then outlines that the rest of the Missouri Territory (formerly Louisiana Territory but had a name change with the admission of Louisiana as a state) above the Missouri Compromise Line would be free and those below would be slave states with the exception of Missouri.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Essay

    1563 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to ease some of the political rivalries between the North and the South (history.com 2009). The compromise stated the fact that all states up north would not have slavery and all states south would allow and continue the act of slavery (history.com 2009). It went both ways since it split the country up evenly between slave and free. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was handwritten by Henry Clay in 1820 (ancestralfindings.com 1995). On March 6th of 1820, President James Monroe signed the Missouri Compromise and made it the new law of the land (loc.gov 2017).

    Read More

  • How Did James Buchanan Compromise

    979 Words  | 4 Pages

    These attempts at compromise and keeping the Union together, while working for a time being, were not properly enforced, and they always seemed to anger one side. The Missouri Compromise was one of the first controversial compromises that encountered the issue of expanding slavery. While Henry Clay created the majority of the two-part resolution, which stated that Missouri would enter the U.S. as a slave state while Maine would enter as a free state and that “slavery was to be excluded from all new states in the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern boundary of Missouri” (U.S. History, 2008-2014), many people viewed the comprise as being extremely flawed. While the Compromise

    Read More

  • Why Did The Missouri Compromise Cause The Civil War

    67 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Missouri compromise was an agreement between the north and south. It allowed Missouri to be the 24th state. Maine was also established, therefore Missouri was a free state. The Mason Dixon line was established, this created a line between the slave and free states. This rule was broken, and even more conflict was contributed to the start of the civil war.

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    However, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.

    Read More

More about Impact Of The Missouri Compromise

Open Document