So they believe that is a better benefit to risk an animal life than a human life. The World Medical Association Declare of Helsinki states that human trials should be preceded by tests on animals. But the real truth is that the drugs that they use on the animals aren’t necessary safe for us , for example the 1950s sleeping pill thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities. Scientist tries it on pregnant mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters, but it did not result in birth defects unless the drug was administered at extremely high doses. In conclusion animals testing should not be done because animals are like human beings, they feel, they live, they eat so why would we want to kill animals for any type of testing when we could try it on a human being that might want to let the scientist try it on them.
Animal testing has been around for more than a century and millions, probably billions of animals have suffer through the pain. Animals all over the world are living their whole lives in loneliness, darkness, and pain. Animal testing has been used for ages to test drugs and cosmetic products, but it hasn’t always been effective. Animal testing may also lead to researchers believing that dangerous substances are safe for human use. People still support animal testing even through there are other better ways to test cosmetics and drugs that don’t hurt any living being.
Do you know that a lot of the products we use on a daily basis involve some type of animal testing? Products that we use every single day are tested on animals such as Windex, Post-it notes, and even Vaseline. Animals have been used for testing since the old ages and a lot of scientists depend on the use of these animals for the development of scientific research. But is the use of animals for scientific purposes really necessary in creating these products? Even though some may say that the use of animal testing has contributed greatly to scientific research it isn 't really worth the risk and torture towards them.
Also vaccines for animals would not be around if we could not test on animals. For example, author Siobhan O’Neill says that, “They may have helped save millions of lives, and for those of us who need to take medicines, we have little control over whether those medicines are tested on animals.” (O’Neill) This says that we need medicines to save people from sickness. Also most of these medicines were tested on animals. If a human gets a disease we need medicines to heal us. A lot of medicines were tested on animals before human usage.
This means that there’s only a 10% chance that the medicines tested on animals are going to work on humans. As for needing animals to avoid using humans in tests, there are more advanced technologies today that could be used to run most of the tests. For example, there is a form of testing called in silico or in vitro which is the use of computers in a way that they can virtually run the same tests that they can run on the animals. When using the in vitro method the scientists use human cells and tissues with computer-modeling techniques to achieve an even better effect than they would with an animal. Along with these in vitro testing skills, there are also human volunteers that can be
The logic remains that animals are being utilized by animal facilities around the world. Even though, humans often progress from successful animal research, the pain, the inflictions, and the deaths of animals are not worth the human asset. Therefore, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety
Animal testing may not always be the most sound or successful way to find the answers but right now there is sometimes no other option. However, this does not mean that scientists can treat animals however they like. There are some horrifying stories of maltreatment but most of the researchers are compassionate people who take great care and caution when carrying out experiments. We must just hope that they try their best to make these experiments as pain free as possible and, as soon as possible, exchange these innocent lives for computers and
Animal testing is a procedure that is performed on living animals for research. The purpose of this research is to is to look at the different diseases and try to find different drugs/medicine that will work to cure/treat a disease. Instead of having, consenting humans agree to help find a treatment, they will use animals. With the animals they will test things that will benefit human health. Typical species that are selected are reptiles, rodents (mice, rats, hamsters, guinea pigs, rabbits,) and other animals—fish, cats, dogs, mini-pigs, monkeys, chimpanzees, etc.
In the present age, it is inevitable and undeniable to develop scientific research given the high demand for medicine and veterinary health. It is universally acknowledged that animals play an indispensable role in scientific research. The British Royal Society, argues that" virtually every medical achievement in the past century reliant on the use of animals in some way. "(The Royal Society 2004, p.1) Whether animals should be used for testing has become much debatable issue. There are pros and cons for this topic.
Live animals aren 't necessary for testing, there are many options such as laptop software, robots, human tissue cultures, and mathematical statistics. Furthermore, the tests the animals are used for regularly come back with fake, misleading outcomes. Humans have been harmed because animals do not react the same way with certain drugs and treatments that people do. Animals additionally do not have the same genetic makeup that humans do, so testing drugs on them is useless. Finally, testing on animals has many moral problems that go with it.