Appointments Definition
Appointments:
The Commissions in making appointments to the Service under their jurisdiction ensure that the persons being appointed satisfy the pre-requisites of integrity, skill, ability, training and experience any other criteria laid down in their Regulations. Appointments are made without discrimination, prejudice or political influence of any kind. For the Commissions, fairness and equality of opportunity is the right of every citizen.
Promotions:
The Commissions are guided by the principles and criteria laid down in their Regulations. Training, experience, merit and ability and relative seniority of all eligible officers are among the criteria considered, along with relevant promotion examinations such as are held for entry into the Administrative class or Prisons
…show more content…
A mechanism therefore, needs to be put in place to minimize such staff movements which usually temporarily affect the capacity for productivity.
An example of the constitution which gives the Prime Minister Veto power to influence or block promotion/transfer is outline as follows:
‘Former Prime Minister, Patrick Manning used his veto power to block Senior Public Servants Feroza Ramjohn from being transfer to the London High Commission and prevented Ganga Persad Kissoon from being promoted as Commissioner of State lands, without any reason.’
The Court of Appeal ruled in two separate rulings in favour of the two public servants. The Counsels for the both public officers was Arnold Ramlogan, before he was appointed Attorney General. This ruling was an historic judgement “because it was the first time that the constitution Veto power of a Prime Minister was successfully
Us Vs Nixon Case Study
961 Words | 4 PagesThe case was argued July 8, 1974 and decided on July 24, 1974. When a subpoena is delivered you can not deny it, however president Nixon did. Then later on was told that he could not and he did not have any special executive powers to being president. They were very limited.
The Significance Of The 1992 Mabo High Court Case
702 Words | 3 PagesTo grasp the historical context leading up to the Mabo decision
Merryman Vs Lincoln
249 Words | 1 PagesThe Supreme Court did not share Lincoln’s opinion. Especially, the Chief Justice Roger Taney who, in his role as the federal circuit judge, ruled that Lincoln’s suspension of Habeas Corpus was unconstitutional in a decision called Ex Parte Merryman. He did so after his recommendation for a trial of Merryman in order to determine if there were any legitimate reasons for his arrest met if refusal form Merryman captors. In the end, The President ignored Taney ruling, and Congress never contested Lincoln’s Habeas Corpus decision. Lincoln also met with strong resistance form the general public in regards to his executive order.
Restricting Abortion In Sandra O Connor's Cases
1250 Words | 5 Pages“Because of the evolving nature of constitutional law, the potential ramifications of O’Connor’s opinion were great. Federal judges in habeas cases were often in the position to rule on questions for which there was not yet a directly controlling Supreme Court precedent (Bikupic, 2005). Shortly after the Teague case Justice O’Connor had to vote in another habeas case Penny v. Lynaugh in this case O’Connor submitted the deciding vote and also wrote the opinion that seemed to disembowel
The Boston Massacre Summary
873 Words | 4 PagesDoug Linder is a professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law where he teaches Constitutional Law. Professor Linder received his J.D. from Stanford Law School (UMKC). He has receive multiple awards for his work and is acknowledged for his article on his Famous Trails website. Linder has published numerous articles over the constitutional law and with his work many people have been able to look back at the historical moment and truly see what occurred on that
Stolen Valor Case Study
308 Words | 2 PagesAbel Fields was convicted under the Stolen Valor Act for falsely claiming he had received the Purple Heart. Fields has never served in the military and therefore has never received a military award. At his first trial, Fields was found guilty for violating the Stolen Valor Act and was sentenced to a fine. Fields then appealed his sentence and the Court of Appeals overturned his conviction citing that Fields’ First Amendment rights were violated. The government then appealed the Court of Appeals’ decision and the case was sent to the Supreme Court.
Summary: The Canadian Parliamentary System
866 Words | 4 PagesParliament’s legislative branch of Government, with the three-part component, it is composed of the House of Commons, the Senate and the Queen (McTeer, 1995), who is represented by the Governor General in Canada (currently David Johnson) (G.G., 2015). These components of government serve more as a ceremonial role with such responsibilities as: “the installation of the Governor General; the Opening of Parliament; the Speech from the Throne, and Royal Assent ceremonies” (Parl. Library, 2011). The Governor General is appointed by the Prime Minister, who advises the Queen about who shall be appointed with a lengthy term of five years, which may eventually be extended (Parl. Library, 2011).
The Constrained Court
429 Words | 2 PagesThe Court’s effectiveness relies on the institutional capacities as well as the ruling’s popularity. When lower-court judges comply with Supreme Court decisions, rulings can have a substantial effect on social policies, as in the case
Essay On Australian Democracy
1267 Words | 6 Pages(Yencken, D. 2008) Australia’s legal and political system meets these criteria. It is yet important to recognise that the rule of law significantly depends on legal precedent for its active upkeep. No government official may violate these limits. No ruler, minister, or political party can tell a judge how to decide a case.
Analysis Of Emily Murphy's Case: A Defining Moment For Canada
1526 Words | 7 Pages7)"The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Decisions." Henrietta Muir Edwards and others (Appeal No. 121 of 1928) v The Attorney General of Canada (Canada) [1929] UKPC 86 (18 October 1929). Accessed May 25, 2017.
The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods
462 Words | 2 PagesWhen people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.
Essay On Judicial Selection
801 Words | 4 PagesJudicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.
Examining Wednesbury's Unreasonableness In Public Decision Making
1460 Words | 6 PagesIn all areas of law reasonableness tends to play a fundamental role including reasonably foreseeability, the reasonable man, beyond reasonable doubt and reasonable force to name a few. The concept of reasonableness in public decision making is no different and has developed, expanded and retracted in various jurisdictions over the past century. In public decision making, reasonableness particularly relates to judicial review, and the actions, events or otherwise which lead a public body to arrive at a particular decision rather the decision itself. It is of great importance that reasonableness is applied to public bodies in order to control the exercise of power and to prevent arbitrary and unfair decisions. In this essay, we will examine
The Canadian Judicial System
1155 Words | 5 PagesThis consists of the Governor General acting on the advice of the Prime Minister for judges of the Supreme Court of Canada and chief and associate chief justices in the provinces; and on the advice of the Minister of Justice for all other superior court judges. (Justice.gc.ca,
Theories Of Recruitment And Selection
3190 Words | 13 PagesTHEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY: 3.1 RECRUITMENT & SELECTION Recruitment and selection is one of the most important management functions. The whole process represents a significant investment in both financial and other resources. Recruitment and selection are two of the most important functions of personnel management. Recruitment procedure selection and helps in selecting a right candidate.
More about Appointments Definition
Us Vs Nixon Case Study
961 Words | 4 PagesThe Significance Of The 1992 Mabo High Court Case
702 Words | 3 PagesMerryman Vs Lincoln
249 Words | 1 PagesRestricting Abortion In Sandra O Connor's Cases
1250 Words | 5 PagesThe Boston Massacre Summary
873 Words | 4 PagesStolen Valor Case Study
308 Words | 2 PagesSummary: The Canadian Parliamentary System
866 Words | 4 PagesThe Constrained Court
429 Words | 2 PagesEssay On Australian Democracy
1267 Words | 6 PagesAnalysis Of Emily Murphy's Case: A Defining Moment For Canada
1526 Words | 7 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods
462 Words | 2 PagesEssay On Judicial Selection
801 Words | 4 PagesExamining Wednesbury's Unreasonableness In Public Decision Making
1460 Words | 6 PagesThe Canadian Judicial System
1155 Words | 5 PagesTheories Of Recruitment And Selection
3190 Words | 13 Pages