In the social psychological literature attitudes are learned i.e. evaluations of objects developed through experience. For example, it is generally agreed that humans are born without predetermined attitudes toward targets, except perhaps a few stimuli closely related to survival (e.g., aversions to pain and cold, attractions to breast milk and the human face). Instead, evaluations of the multitude of stimuli in our environments are formed over the years, on the basis of both personal experiences and information from others. (Olson, 1998) An attitude is a subjective experience involving an evaluation of something or somebody. In psychology, an attitude refers to a set of emotions, beliefs and behaviors towards a particular object, person thing …show more content…
We are conditioned or adjusted to a certain set of people, situations etc., we will be influenced by that. Hence, our associations lead to develop attitudes; negative reinforcement such as punishment may lead to develop negative attitudes. Modelling is another important means of attitude formation. People, try to emulate the person they admire, and this include accepting the attitudes held by these peoples as one's own. Researchers have discovered that people are more likely to behave according to their attitudes under certain conditions: When your attitudes are the result of personal experience, when you are an expert in the subject, when you expect a favorable outcome, when the attitudes are repeatedly expressed and when you stand to win or lose something due to the issue. (Cherry, …show more content…
In twin studies which compare monozygotic twins with dizygotic twins and their extended families. The similarities in attitudes of monozygotic twins are greater than that of either dizygotic or ordinary siblings. It is also greater than that found between adopted children and either their biological parents (shared genes) or their adaptive parents (shared environment). much of the research done on identical twins have exactly the same genetic makeup while non-identical twins are more strongly related than attitudes of non-identical twins, this is some evidence that suggests that attitudes can be inherited. Indeed, findings show that there relationships are stronger for identical as big arties laying chess, roller coaster rides, abortion, the death penalty and the capitalism. Although diverse, these attitudes toward novelty, risk and political beliefs tend to be organized by political convertism. Political convertism also seems to be heritable. Bouchard, Segal Tellegen et al found that conservative social attitudes are shared more strongly by monozygotic and dizygotic twins and this study focused to twins reared apart. In this case, similarities in upbringing cannot account. This is not to say that genetics account for most or even most of our attitudes formation. On the contrary, evidence suggests that genetics effects are fairly small. Other factors do not strongly determine attitudes. However, in addition a
The social group we are in is determined from a young age and is based upon values we learned within the home. Although we are not born a Democrat or Republican, ideological values lean us toward a political party. In class, we discussed that period forces can also have an effect on young people, but not enough to have them change party lines. The identity we developed is derived from our social groups, since certain religions, racial groups, education level, and even our economic class is associated with different political parties. Poorer people and racial minorities tend to vote Democrat, and college non-educated whites are increasingly become more GOP (lecture).
Ridley talks about facts and uses logic in regard of divorce rates in twins and criminal records of adoptees in Denmark. Closely observing that divorce rates in twins are partly supported by genetic variation and partly by non-shared environmental factors, it was concluded that, “You are no more likely to divorce if reared in a broken home than the average.” This shows that non-shared environment-- home and parents-- do not affect the person’s choices, characters or personalities but it is rather the environment consisting of peers along with genes that play a role. Similarly adoptees that have a criminal record usually diminish once adopted in a neighbourhood and going to school with non-criminal backgrounds and good morals even if biological and adopting parents have a criminal background. These two examples show strong reasons to support Ridley’s
In chapter eleven, “Paired and Pared”, of The Sibling Effect, author Jeffrey Kluger informs his audience about twins and only children and how they are different than other broods. Not only are twins and only children, referred to as “singletons,” biologically different, but their emotional, physical, psychological, and social development is as well. By devoting an entire chapter solely to twins and singletons, Kluger is indirectly claiming that these offspring view the world in a special, and sometimes unexplainable, way. Kluger validates this claim by the use of governmental policies, psychological studies, controversial viewpoints, and personal narratives. Kluger opens up the chapter by summarizing the harsh views of psychologists G. Stanley Hall and Abraham Arden Brill.
Dr. Rettew connects to class discussions and readings on shared and unshared environmental influences, evocative gene environment correlation, temperament, and the goodness-of-fit. Twins that with unshared environmental influences, such as different placentas, could adapt different temperaments (Berk, 2009). Also, twins that have been adopted into separate families could have different personality traits because they lived in completely different environments their whole life, even if they shared environmental influences of the same placenta (Berk, 2009). With an evocative gene environment correlation, a child’s genotype could draw in a certain type of environment, such as babies who appear more attractive will receive more attention (Berk, 2009). The type of attention a child gets could affect its temperament.
While I realize that few people have the opportunity to experience such a close bond, this “twin thing” has hindered my individual development. Even though I realize that it is hard for people to distinguish me from my identical twin, it is frustrating to be always referred to as “the twins.” People
When people think of twins, they usually imagine two people looking exactly alike, dressing exactly alike, and completing each other’s sentences. Most imagine having a twin would be wonderful, after all, you could switch classes in school and read each other's mind, what’s not to like? However, most people are completely unaware and insensitive to the struggles of being a twin. Society generally views twins as two people wrapped in one rather than two independent individuals. As a twin myself, I have spent much of my life trying to establish my own identity.
Studies show that nurture is more responsible for the way you act. Nurture dictates how you respond to others. It is true that many identical twins are a lot alike, but people don’t notice the differences between them. For example, the Jim twins were a lot alike, but I think that is just a coincidence. Anais and Sam both had the same laugh, but they also had different jobs.
The Leachy and Burks study is another case in which genetics are seen to be inherited. In this study, nonadoptive families and adopted families were being tested to see if there was a correlation between environmental factors on the child’s development and how genetics play a role in determining their IQ. The hypothesis of this study assumes that adoptive children in their homes show different intelligence then that of their adoptive parents. The case study itself shows that there was almost no correlation between these two subjects. On the other hand, parents with their biological children show a correlation in having almost the same IQ scores.
Nature vs. Nurture Extra Credit The debate in psychology whether and to what extent our aspects of behavior are either genetic or learned characteristics has been going on for a long time. Genetic is the nature side of the argument. Learned refers to the nurture side of this long debate.
They are Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness (Maltby, Day & Macaskill, 2013). In order to highlight genes being prevalent in personality development, twin studies are compared. Monozygotic (MZ) twins are identical twins which share 100% of their genetic makeup while dizygotic
3.1.5 The last psychological factor is attitude. An attitude shows that a person’s relatively consist evaluations, feelings, and tendencies toward an object or idea. For example, our phone buyer gadgets hold attitudes such as “Buy the best“, the Apple products has become the best electronics products in the world. So that, a person’s attitude can help themselves to recognize what is good and what is no good for our daily life. 3.2 PERSONAL
Many children adopt the views of their parents as parents often communicate the values and beliefs that are important to them onto their children. According to our textbook, families beliefs and opinions may be influenced by race, social class, educational environment, and religious beliefs. Education is another place where political socialization may occur. Many
Unlike twins Have you ever seen unlike twins? Me neither, until my sisters were born. When someone mentions the word “twin” our brain immediately visualize two persons or things that are equal, or at least that have many similarities. In this particular case, my sisters are the contrary of everything that our mind is imagining about the genetic concept of being a twin. Afterwards, one day one of them was lost in a park for about 45 minutes.
The conceptual structure of this theory is Beliefs as foundations for attitudes that is the knowledge about object will determines the attitudes, intentions & behaviour. Belief also used for making judgements, forming evaluations and for decision making. Behaviour is about the observable acts that are studied in their
Personality is defined as the combination of characteristics or qualities that form an individual 's unique character. Personality theory is the approaches to understanding the “What”, “How” and “When” of characteristics and features that make up an individual 's personality. An insight into personality is important to understand the function of a person’s mind. By doing this you would be able to understand and observe your own psyche from an outside perspective, interact with others better and understand why they do what they do or predict how someone may react to something. My personality can be describe as Introverted since I am reserved, practical and quiet.