Common law is characterized by the predominant importance of the so-called case law, or law of judicial creation. Unlike” state law”, common law is continuously changing.
In fact Common law is made by the judges sitting in court. Judges are bound by the "rules above," when deciding a case they must apply the rule that a judge in a case identical, applied before them.
They can apply a different rule only if their "case" presents the facts "different" from that previously decided by other courts.
Legal rules are mostly "processed" by the judge in the analysis of the case. Common law guarantees that the law remain always the same thought out the Uk and Walles. Nevertheless is the supreme court and the court of Appeal that produces the legal precedent in relation to criminal matters in England and Wales.
Although the English legal system is founded on common law, that is not to say that statutes are any less binding. In fact,
…show more content…
The aims of the European Union are economic and monetary union, free movement of workers, establishment of the internal market , balanced economic growth, competitive social market economy, equality and promotion of economic, social and territorial …show more content…
This is especially true when considering the interpretation of the rules of English law.
The English system knows three rules of interpretation of the law: Literal rule, Golden rule and Mischief rule. The golden rule can be applied only when through the literal rule does not lead to a satisfactory outcome. The mischief rule can be applied only when through the literal rule and the golden rule is not possible achieve a satisfactory
5.)What is the nature of law as described in Common Sense? Over whom is it binding and why? Common Sense if basically a rant on how badly the English have treated the colonists and why they should attempt to become independent from British rule. In his writing Paine states that in a monarchy the king is the law so in a free country the law should be king. In the colonies the king was the law for the colonists and the law was unfair and cruel.
Our appellate courts will be the ones making the policy, while our trail courts will enforce the policy, it appear that many of the lower courts have more discretion when enforcing the appellate court decisions. Why is this possible many are nonlawyers who do not possess the skills needed to read many of complex judicial decisions, and due in part the decisions of the higher courts as well. Many of the policy are available and the judges are anticipated to read them. When the lower court infers the higher courts decision is based upon different factors, such as the judges on personal policy, their background, alternatively the lower court judge will embrace the higher courts decision while others may not.
Comparison Between Chief Justices Earl Warren and William Rehnquist Jacob Smith Park University, CJ221 Criminal Procedure When looking at Chief Justice Earl Warren and Chief Justice William Rehnquist, you begin to notice a difference in their idealistic approaches to the interpretation of the law. Earl Warren was very liberal in his judgments, standing on principle that individual rights needed to be protected. He saw that the need for the individual, specifically individuals of different race and ethnic origins deserved the same constitutional rights as everyone else. Chief Justice William Rehnquist on the other hand, was much more conservative and believed that some individual rights must be sacrificed in order to maintain order within
However the high court have all the rights and power to reconsider common law which was exactly the case in this situation. The role of
Did the EU’s goal of shared peace between lots of different cultures and people work out? The European Union, also known as the EU is a supranational organization that consists of 28 different countries. The EU was made to bring together countries that were torn apart by the war and to create peace between those countries. The EU works toward shared goals and issues yet remain separate countries all the same. The benefits of being a member in the European Union does not outweigh the costs due to loss of sovereignty, social unrest and peace, economic issues, and cultural identity with the diversity of languages and cultures.
The relationship between the law and society affects everyone and everything. How the law is written and how it is acted upon in society are two different things. It is imperative, therefore, that we as citizens pay attention to and understand the importance of the relationship between the law and society as it affects both our own lives and the lives of those around us. We engage in and witness the power of the law and society everyday. The law is personal, however, the law is also discretionary depending on where you look.
Eventually, a special court known as the Court of Chancery was set up by the King. The holdings of this court depended upon the conscience and morality of the Lord Chancellor unlike the rulings of the Common Law Courts. The law that was established and enforced in the Court of Chancery resulted in the emergence of what is now known as ‘Equity’. Over time, Equity became more popular as it had greater flexibility and was more approachable than Common Law.
The four major legal families of law are Civil Law, Common Law, Socialist Law, and Sacred Law. Today, most nations follow either Civil Law or Common Law. Sometimes, countries mix civil and common law and use a little of both. Some countries that follow Civil Law are China, Japan, Germany, France, and Spain. The countries that follow Common Law are North America, the United Kingdom, and other Commonwealth countries around the world.
[5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law
The European Union is a strong force to reckon with, mainly because of the vast amount of resources it controls. The EU has put in place institutions and policy-making powers to react to or shape economic conditions on the continent. The adoption of the euro and the monetary union further impart strength to this international alliance of powerful countries. Many scholars have suggested parallels between the EU and other international organizations like the UN. They claim that these organizations will make the world converge into a state much like the European Union.
The use of ECHR or European Convention on Human Rights in British courts before it was being incorporated into United Kingdom law is an example. UK and any other country which relies to the power of legislation, should always if possible do not conflicts with the international law. Therefore the supremacy of both laws depends on the acceptance if the municipal courts to the international law
The law is an intriguing concept, evolving from society’s originalities and moral perspectives. By participating in the legal system, we may endeavour to formulate a link between our own unique beliefs and the world in which we live. Evidently, a just sense of legality is a potent prerequisite for change, enabling society to continue its quest for universal equality and justice. Aristotle once stated that "even when laws have been written down, they ought not to remain unaltered".
‘The Rule of Law’ came into popularity under the hands of A.V. Dicey in the 19th Century. Aristotle, another renowned philosopher once said more than two thousand years ago, "The rule of law is better than that of any individual. " [1] The Rule of Law is ultimately, the foundation of democracy that every country should acquire for the better of their own legal systems, regardless of whether it is criminal law, civil law or public law. It is a major source of legitimation for governments in the modern world. A government that abides by the rule of law is seen as good and worthy of respect.
In the article entitled ‘Determining the Ratio Decidendi of the Case’ by Arthur L. Goodhart, I underwent a roller coaster-like journey on exploring the science behind the nature of a precedent in English law. Goodhart started with the attempt to explain the full meaning of ratio decidendi in the simplest terms. He referred to Sir John Salmond’s definition in which I have interpreted ratio decidendi as the principle of law that is found in a court decision and possesses the authority to be binding. Ratio decidendi should be distinguished from a judicial decision, as the latter is a wider concept and contains the ratio decidendi, whereas the former is a principle that carries the force of law. In another reference, Professor John Chipman Gray
Law is present in our daily life and in everything we do. We cannot think a second without law. Whatever we can see around us everything is connected with the law. Sometimes we can see it and sometimes we cannot see but feel it. Law is not just a thing to obey for yourself but making a peaceful society.