Importance Of Comparative Public Administration

3.2.1 Ideal or bureaucratic approach
In this approach, structures of groups are evaluated in relations of their horizontal and vertical difference as well as the span of control. Policies are examined as well as the framework of purpose is determined
3.2.2 Structural-functional approach
This is a very popular approach for associating various administrative structures. It studies the society in relations of the numerous structures and their functions for getting an understanding concerning their positioning and functioning. Organisations in this approach can refer to the government. The only limits of this approach is that there has to be correct identification of the organisations before examining them
3.2.3 Ecological approach
The ecological

Varna and Sharma (1983) states that there are two factors that make comparative studies significant. The first factor relates to the academic study of Public Administration. It is believed that through Comparative Public Administration; hypotheses, generalisations, models and theories can be constructed which can collectively help in the scientific study of Public Administration.
The old orthodoxy of principles of administration are not considered valid anymore and therefore it is believed that generalisations relating to administrative structures and behaviour emerging out of comparative studies in different nations and cultures can help in formulating theoretical constructs which can provide a scientific basis to the study of Public administration. Furthermore. Varna and Sharma (1983) also argue that Comparative Public Administration contributes to better understanding of the specific characteristics of administrative systems working in different nations and cultures. Therefore, comparative studies aids in enlightening issues that are liable for national and cross-cultural evaluations and changes in the administrative

Done over study of Comparative Public Administration, those who make policies can observe causes for the success or failure of particular administrative arrangements and forms in other environmental surroundings. It is fascinating to find out by comparative analysis to which vital environmental factors help in the promotion of administrative effectiveness and to which administrative structures function successfully in each type of environmental situations.
By Comparative Public Administration, we also learn about the administrative practices monitored in various nations which then we can attempt to implement the practices which can be suitable in our nations and systems. Thus, Ramesh (1985) mentions that the significance of Comparative Public Administration lies in the academic value of relationships of technical and systematic study of Public Administration and in cultivating the knowledge about other administrative systems so that suitable administrative changes can be brought about different