The Death Penalty: America’s Solution to Crime What would you do if someone you loved was murdered? Would you want the murderer to be executed? The death penalty gives fair punishment to criminals like murderers, rapists, hijackers, and terrorists. The death penalty reduces crimes like homicide, rape, and terror attacks. It also saves taxpayers money.
The death penalty has been a part of the judicial system for many years. It is the legal process where the state court system orders execution of a person for a crime he or she committed. A death penalty crime is a horribly brutal and violent crime most people cannot even imagine. These crimes consist of acts like serial killing, mass murder, and other crimes of violent killing. However, Espionage and treason neither are brutal or violent and are considered a death penalty offense.
“The death penalty is not as effective as many people think.” The death penalty as a form of punishment for heavy crimes has been implemented worldwide for thousand years. Historically this punishment has always been associated with revenge and strength of power. Governments were using the death penalty to scare and suppress their enemies. The death penalty is still in “criminal law” of some of the countries and has a lot of opponents as well as I who think this punishment is not effective for the following reasons. First of all I believe this punishment violates the fundamental principles of human rights according to the United Nation’s Universal Declaration which says everyone has the right to life, liberty and security no matter what is their status, but unfortunately there is no prohibition against the death penalty in international law.
The people opposing the death penalty usually believe that it shouldn’t be used because all life is precious. There are still 31 states that use the death penalty as of August 2017(Death Penalty). With this in mind, should the US government stop using the death penalty as a form of punishment? The People that oppose the death penalty believe that it shouldn’t be used because there’s better alternatives to deal with the criminals. “(...)in the United States in 1976, 138 innocent men and women have been released from death row, including
For hundreds of years, the death penalty has been a way to punish the guilty, the accused, and sometimes the innocent. Some believe that capital punishment is a way to show and teach the public that committing a crime is wrong, unlawful, dishonorable. It is a way to have justice for the victim and their families. Some also believe that people who don’t agree with the death penalty feel that they are valuing the killer 's lives before the victims. Capital punishment/ death penalty isn’t just black and white.
There are severals pros and cons for having death penalty system in China. PROS DETERRENCE EFFECT The death penalty can act as a threat to deter people from offending the crime listed in the list of capital offences. There are two forms of deterrence. The first type is the specific deterrence it aims to discourage the criminals (never got caught before) committing the crimes listed in the list again. After they understand the consequences for them if they commit the crime, they would not dare to commit crimes again.
“On the other hand, a person who commits a murder or a rape knows that they are risking their freedom, which can serve as a powerful deterrent” (Apecsecadmin). In the same way, the death penalty can also serve as an extremely powerful deterrent. If other criminals see that this is happening, and they are heading in the direction of committing the same crimes, it might make them rethink what they are doing if they know there is a potential risk of receiving the death penalty. Canada abolished the death penalty 1976. Twenty seven years after the abolishment, Canada saw a 44 per cent drop in murders across the country (“5
Well, on the question arises is if the death penalty should be abolished permanently or continued to be regarded as an option in the judiciary. There are several angles in which we must perceive in regards to the positives and negatives of the death penalty as discussed in above. The sole purpose of the death penalty is to invoke retribution and provide for as deterrence to the crimes associated with
In this essay, I will write why death penalty should end by writing about the violation of human rights, execution of innocent people, the fact that it does not deter crime and money. First, I will write about the violation of the human rights. Death penalty is a violation on the most basic human right. It violates that every human being has the right to freedom and life, article 3 in the united nation declaration of the human rights. Humanity