Importance Of Foreign Policy In The Philippines
INDEPENDENT FOREIGN POLICY (2)
(Isn’t that the kind of foreign policy that a self-respecting sovereign state must have?)
Why has the declaration of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte aka Digong that the Philippines shall henceforth pursue an independent foreign policy – as mandated by the Constitution, mind you – stirred so much fuss among so-called political analysts and experts, sundry politicians, some oligarchs and remnants of the Aquino administration?
I am not a political analyst, nor am I an expert on foreign policy. What I teach my students (as Dean of the College of International Relations of the Lyceum of the Philippines for the last ten years) and write in this column about foreign policy is borne out of decades of exposure
…show more content…
in his recent speech before the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. He said, among other things, that we are no longer the little brown brothers of the Americans, that we should not be lectured upon on the question of human rights; that we remain committed to the rule of law; that it is inappropriate for us to be given certain things with a list of “to-dos".
Isn’t that the kind of foreign policy that a self-respecting sovereign state must have?
Yasay also confirmed Digong’s position that we stand by our agreements with the US and the international community, in general.
******
Why then the so-called political analysts, experts and government critics’ apparent impression that we are becoming anti-American; that we might alienate and lose aid from the US; that we will lose US backing on the West Philippine Sea/South China Sea (WPS/SCS) dispute; that we are becoming pro-China?
How about we becoming pro-Filipino for a change?!
And why don’t they let the US speak for herself?
Fact is, the US has already spoken in the wake of all this brouhaha about Digong’s pronouncement of pursuing an independent foreign
Truman Dbq
696 Words | 3 PagesThesis/Argument: Although my original thesis and a few other answers resembled that of Dr. Carey’s, I think this one may work as well. “An examination of the origins of the NSC illuminates our understanding of Truman as president as well as our understanding of bureaucratic politics. Ultimately, it even informs our knowledge of foreign policy, for the NSC was the newest weapon in the Cold War.” (Page 361. first paragraph)
Monroe Doctrine Dbq
894 Words | 4 PagesIt is no doubt that the Monroe Doctrine has become a staple in the study of American foreign policy. Since the establishment of the nation, America’s role in foreign policy has been questioned and under constant scrutiny. In his Farewell Address, George Washington warned of foreign entanglement. Stemming from Washington’s warning to Monroe’s doctrine – a disagreement has grown, what is the American role in the World. It was President James Monroe’s doctrine that ushered in a new belief for America’s role.
Washington's Farewell Address
427 Words | 2 PagesAddress is its inaugurating document, it is not a tradition separate from liberty, but simply the means of defending the first tradition. Moreover, one of McDougall’s main purposes throughout is to show that unilateralism was not isolationism, which in fact never existed. “Our vaunted tradition of ‘isolationism,’” he states, “is no tradition at all, but a dirty word that interventionists, especially since Pearl Harbor, hurl at anyone who questions their policies” (p. 40). That the term functions as a smear (and a proven method of forestalling debate) is true enough. But it is hard to see how Washington’s doctrine can be equated with McDougall’s unilateralism.
Jimmy Carter Essay
1174 Words | 5 PagesThe United States we know today is the product of many different events and ideologies. From war to peace, and from isolation to internationalism, 44 different presidents with many altered circumstances participate in shaping the United States we know today. Scholars have subsequently discussed the way US Presidents manage foreign affairs, and they are still debating the successes and failures, or which among them deserve the most credit. In this research paper, I discuss the foreign policy of president Jimmy Carter and I examine the basic principals he stood on. Carter had many actions coming from a human rights approach.
Who Is Andrew Jackson A Villain
446 Words | 2 PagesHe didn’t want it to resort to violence, he only wanted out great country to develop.
Hoganson's Views On The Annexation Of The Philippines
616 Words | 3 PagesBoth Nell Irvin Painter and Kristin L. Hoganson have two different prospective on the annexation of the Philippines. Painter’s approach of explaining the annexation was more of an economic view rather then Hoganson’s, which was a more sexiest view. An example of Painter’s view is when he said,” the culprit, it seemed, was agricultural and industrial overproduction” (Painter). He is saying the America simply produced too much, and they did not care. Business thought taking over The Philippines would help American gain access to trading with China.
How Did The United States Change Its Foreign Policy From 1918-1953?
606 Words | 3 Pages“Why and in what ways did the United States change its foreign policy from 1918-1953?” Since World War I, the united states had always had a problem with forcing its foreign policy. Throughout the past 100 years, the foreign policy has changed depending on public opinion and what was going on in other parts of the world. One of the largest changes in the foreign policy occurred from the end of World War I (1918) up until the ending of the Korean War (1953). Essentially the U.S foreign policy evolved from isolationist “prevention of war” to interventionism “protective containment of communism”.
Annexed Philippines Dbq
749 Words | 3 PagesAs Albert J. Beveridge pointed out in Document B, “would not the people of the Philippines prefer the just, human, civilizing government of this republic to the savage, bloody rule… from which we have saved them?” Just, human, civilizing? Strict, biased, Christianizing was more like it. In these islands, the United States of America once again made the same mistake it had made with the Native Americans. Determined that there way was the best way, ‘the slaughter of the Filipinos’ (Doc.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Eisenhower's Farewell Address
703 Words | 3 PagesFifty-three years, ten months and eighteen days ago, Eisenhower gave what is now known as one of the most memorable farewell addresses in presidential history, excluding George Washington and his departing speech, to the nation. In this amazing address, Eisenhower expresses fears and warns of deficit spending, the corrupting influence of the military, and the possible corruption of science. In quick overview, this speech seems like a simple farewell to the nation he had served for so many years, but if you dive a little deeper, the meaning is much more multifaceted. After briefly thanking Congress, Ike then delves into the problems he foresees, identifying two main points and sub-points.
Pros And Cons To Annex The Philippines
1178 Words | 5 PagesThe United States of the early 20th century was one with a booming economy and a hunger for power. They had expanded westward and were looking to continue to expand their territory across the seas, in order to assert their dominance as a global superpower among the powerful nations of the time. The poor relations between Cubans and their Spanish rulers eventually led to the Treaty of Paris, which is when Spain surrendered the Philippines to the United States. It was at this point that another major divide between the American people was created. Many Americans believed that attempting to gain power over as many territories as possible was a bad idea and one that went against what America was built on.
Comparing US Society In The 1920s And The 1950s
1659 Words | 7 PagesHe stressed that we should focus more on domestic affairs rather than get involved with foreign countries. He believed that alliances should only be made if it is absolutely
Examples Of Expansion Dbq
1128 Words | 5 PagesIn Document 6, it shows a towering Uncle Sam holding a key to China under a literal open door. This represents America being successful in trading with China (presumably because of the territorial gains of the Philippines), and being able to block other countries from trading with China. I should include this in my DBQ next time. Also, I can relate this to the Open Door Note, which was America’s way of trying to make sure no other country could dominate trade in China. This ties back into my argument of a political continuation because it supports America’s constant motivation to prevent other nations from dominating a region.
Mao Zedong Foreign Policy
1763 Words | 8 PagesThe transition of power in China changed the dynamics of post-World War II relations. For the United States, the so-called “Loss of China” was a a catastrophe, not only because the US supported Chiang Kai-shek in the last few years, but also because it seems to be a victory for the Soviet Union and the global Communism. For China, in 1949 started for the first time in its history the possibility to build foreign relations without being “suppressed by unequal treaties” by western powers. But China‘s relations to other countries remained very complicated and complex.
Annexation Of The Philippines Essay
437 Words | 2 PagesThe Philippines had been fighting for their freedom against the Spanish for many years. Naturally, when America defeated the Spaniards in the war, the Filipinos rejoiced at the thought that they may be able to finally return safely and peacefully back to their home, Manila. Where this information comes from in the text, would be: “These Filipinos believed that
Rhetorical Analysis Of Barack Obama's Victory Speech
1341 Words | 6 PagesRhetorical Analysis of Obama’s Victory Speech Barack Obama was re-elected as the president of the US on November 6, 2012 from Chicago, Illinois. This paper will throw light and analyse various elements Barrack Obama is using to portray his political ideology to audiences through his speech. I intend to focus on the rhetorical effects of the speech. By using various form of rhetorical tools such as Tautology or Anaphora, President Obama gives a speech which focuses on the idea of American life such as the American dream, American promise and the future.
More about Importance Of Foreign Policy In The Philippines
Truman Dbq
696 Words | 3 PagesMonroe Doctrine Dbq
894 Words | 4 PagesWashington's Farewell Address
427 Words | 2 PagesJimmy Carter Essay
1174 Words | 5 PagesWho Is Andrew Jackson A Villain
446 Words | 2 PagesHoganson's Views On The Annexation Of The Philippines
616 Words | 3 PagesHow Did The United States Change Its Foreign Policy From 1918-1953?
606 Words | 3 PagesAnnexed Philippines Dbq
749 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Eisenhower's Farewell Address
703 Words | 3 PagesPros And Cons To Annex The Philippines
1178 Words | 5 PagesComparing US Society In The 1920s And The 1950s
1659 Words | 7 PagesExamples Of Expansion Dbq
1128 Words | 5 PagesMao Zedong Foreign Policy
1763 Words | 8 PagesAnnexation Of The Philippines Essay
437 Words | 2 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Barack Obama's Victory Speech
1341 Words | 6 Pages