(Q1: Journal 1 - Identity) My name is Josh Peterson. I was born on the 7th of November, 2000. I was born and raised in London, and then moved to Australia in 2005. I love playing computer games and doing taekwondo. I am good at, and like, Japanese and Technology at school. I am Catholic, just like the rest of my family. My parents, who are loving and caring, have taught me all about moral integrity and the importance of having moral values in life. As a student at Marist College Ashgrove, I consider myself as part of the community. The values which I have learnt, such as honesty, justice, courage and persistence help me. I have self-respect and respect for others, self-esteem, I help others in need and I stand up for what I believe is right. …show more content…
If you have an informed conscience, you are able to create judgements about how morally right something or someone is. Through Catholic teachings, we learn when making an informed conscience decision, it’s important to gather the facts about a particular circumstance and to have knowledge about morals, values, virtues and laws before a decision can be reached. People develop an informed conscience through learning about what’s right and wrong by using our heart and our mind. This can be achieved through following and understanding Catholic teachings and also following and obeying The Ten Commandments. We also learn how to develop one through Jesus’ teachings and the scriptures in the Bible. People also learn from parents, friends, teachers or other people. In a group setting, most people would do whatever everyone else does, whether it is right or wrong. If a person in this group setting were to stand up to everyone else to tell them what they are doing is wrong, they would be using their informed conscience. An example of this could be a group of people at a school deciding to go and raid other people’s school bags, which is inappropriate behaviour. If one person in that group stood up to everyone else by gathering the facts about the situation, they would be able to make a good decision and not raid the bags because they would be not be doing the …show more content…
Good is usually defined as something that is a moral act, or being moral – the right thing to do. Evil is usually defined as an immoral act, or being immoral – the wrong thing to do. There are 2 types of evil – physical and moral. Physical evil is something that occurs naturally, like a natural disaster. Moral evil is when someone chooses to abuse their free will for the wrong purposes. I know what good and evil are because they were taught to me from many people, including my friends, family, parents and teachers. People, including myself, know what is wrong from experiences – I have learnt from the consequences of my actions. An example of good in society today could be someone donating to charity just because they know that the donations are going to people who are less fortunate. People who are usually selfless could be classified as being good, because of what they do. An example of evil could be robbing a bank so that they can have the money for themselves. People who are regularly selfish could be classified as being evil, immoral or bad because of their actions. The act of becoming part of the MATES program at Marist College Ashgrove through feeding the homeless is good and moral. Helping others who are less fortunate and in need is selfless and moral. There are many stories that show times when Jesus healed and taught people important lessons. A good example
Adrian Peterson There are only 1,696 players in the NFL. The elite of the elite. This may sound like a large number but in the grand scheme of things, 1,696 men out of the 150 million men in the United States is nothing. One of these elite few is Adrian Peterson. With over 12,000 rushing yards and 100 touchdowns in his career, some would say Adrian is one of the best running backs in NFL history (NFL).
Selflessness and Selfishness By definition, selflessness means being “concerned with the needs and wishes of others that with one’s own.” Selflessness can also be interpreted as completely forgetting themselves for the sake of another person. Being selfish on the other hand, is defined as “lacking consideration for others; concerned chiefly with one's own personal profit or pleasure.” Being selfish can also be associated with greed and gluttony. Even though these two words have completely opposite meanings, they are two traits that every human being has.
On the topic of good vs bad, there are two main schools of thought. The first idea is written by Socrates, called Socratic Intellectualism, while the second was written by his student Plato, called the Principle of Opposites. Socrates’ main idea is that humans will always act in accordance to what is right. He believes that no person can knowingly commit an evil act or willingly do harm. In contrast to this, Plato states that being adverse to something and wanting that same thing are opposites.
Good vs. Evil Are humans evil and do good to make up for their evilness or are they good and just make bad judgment calls? It is obvious through reading “Lather and Nothing Else” by Hernando Tellez, “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, and “The Black Cat’’ by Edgar Allen Poe that people are really good but make bad judgment calls. The first example of this is in “Lather and Nothing Else”.
Through out history evil has been best depicted as the absence of goodness and goodness as the absence of evil. With goodness being comprehended as the direct opposite of evil. It is under speculation that maybe there can 't exist only one general meaning of good vs. evil. I trust this, in light of the fact that any one individual 's perception of good or evil is without a doubt directed by one 's social comprehension of certain qualities and ethics within their culture, i.e. the power of social conformity (Muncaster-Social Psychology Lecture, 2016). Yes, there can be cases of evil that is seen as malevolent all over the world but due to the ethnocentric component of the perception of cultural morals and values, one is unable to categorize another individual as evil or good based upon their own cultural understanding of this notion.
The reality is that good and evil cannot be divided due to a difference of beliefs. This means that a person may see something as evil that another person see as good.
This shows why Hobbes believed in the monarchial form of government. Good is considered as morally righteous and evil is moral wrongdoing. I think that humans are inherently evil because they have to make an effort
This is because we cannot officially define what the words “good” or “evil” really mean. The answer depends on the opinion of the person being asked. Many people believe that we can be born bad. However, there exists a significantly stronger argument that people are indeed born good. There is factual evidence that supports this claim.
However, can’t it be both? Both Mencius and Hsun Tzu can be right, there are millions of people in the world and some are good and some are evil,“If you plant the seeds carefully at the same time and in the same place, they’ll all sprout and grow ripe by summer solstice. If they don’t grow the same it 's because of inequities in richness of soil, amounts of rainfall, or the care given them by farmers” (Mencius 81). Some may be evil but react to what they’ve done and changed to good. Others may be good but have been hurt and chose to be evil.
Those who commit wicked acts because they can not see what is truly good have a skewed point of view for a reason. Their character is tainted by vice because they have habitually committed vicious acts in the past. Since they originally had a conscience, they must have willingly committed wrongdoing to warp their perception of what is good. Therefore, those who pursue an apparent good but commit wrong acts, due to a skewed appearance of what is good, are still responsible for their
Can we consider people as Good or Evil? People can be defined as neither good nor evil because many factors lead to us being a mixture of both. One of these factors is that we only have one perspective of life and the actions they do. This means we don 't have all the information to be able to form an opinion on them. Another factor is that we are unable to measure how good or bad an action is.
Since the beginning of human existence people use such words as morality, generosity, ethics, kindness to describe the goodness; and immorality, coarseness, infirmity to describe badness. People see goodness and badness in a way they want. However, overabundance of sources which define goodness and badness such as society, religion and mass media have made lots of confusions in describing
People of virtue go out of their way to put others first and think about how they can help others and the world around them. Conversely, evil is understood to be morally repugnant behavior or acts which intentionally cause harm to others. Someone who is bad only thinks about themselves and how they can use others to their own benefit. I think that good and evil is inherent in all of us, as humans, and has been within us since the beginning of our existence.
Evil is unique to each individual, how people were raised and what they were exposed to will alter their definition of evil. However, people generally agree that homicide, rape, torture, genocide, and terrorism are all evil. Causing agony or suffering is considered evil. Manipulating the weak or manipulating children, in any way, is considered evil. Despite our societal understanding that these acts are evil and that evil is bad, we witness evil nearly every day.
If a person knows what is ‘good’, then their manner of behaviour will always be good, as they possess the knowledge of how to do so. If a person acts in a ‘bad’ or evil way, this is simply because they lack the knowledge of how to act in a virtuous manner. For Socrates, it was simply a case of knowledge being conducive to good behaviour, and ignorance being conducive to bad behaviour. No-one chooses to act in an evil way, according to Socrates. We aim for good behaviour but fall short of