Internet Privacy-The right to be forgotten (The EU, US and the Indian perspective & The challenges associated with it)
Privacy: - Meaning & its importance
Privacy in normal parlance means solitude, seclusion, the person prefers to be in such a state whereby he is secluded from the world at large. The “right to privacy” means the right to be left alone to live one’s own life with the minimum degree of interference. Internet is now considered as a serious threat to privacy, with the scope of Internet expanding manifold as the Internet gives liberty to every person to express their opinions about everything freely it is said to give voice to the voiceless, it gives ample scope for anonymity, and anonymity is the biggest threat which cyber lawyers
…show more content…
The right to be forgotten is one such right, which a person couldn’t have imagined the same few years back, but with the rise of the social media and the growing importance of search engines, the need for such a right to be developed arises. It’s not a right to be purged from the memory of people who know you, but rather to control how information about you appears online. If there is no legitimate reason for keeping it, the data should be removed from their system. The ruling in the Costeja case emphatically stated that wherever it appears that the information is “incorrect, inaccurate, irrelevant or excessive for the processes of data processing, individuals have a right to ask the search engines to remove the links with personal information about them. The right to be forgotten is indeed a valuable tool for keeping a check on the content which is being linked online by the search engines, but at the same time it is becomes a dangerous tools in the hands of the people who demand the content to be removed which could also be considered as a threat to freedom of speech and expression, say for instance a leader of political party who is a probable candidate for some elections would definitely want to segregate the flattery news about him displayed on the search engines from the news which is not going to get him votes from the public. The right to be forgotten provides a mechanism whereby information which interferes with the private life of a person can be de-linked from the search engine, but at the same time if the information is necessary for public interest or if the activity of the person is within the public domain such information cannot be de-linked, as it is important for the people to be aware of it. The ruling also exempts information, which is being displayed purely for “journalistic
Amid the ever changing world we live in where the internet expands globally, the question arises how to regulate and prosecute wrongdoings. As technology advances daily, laws have to adapt quickly to ensure that the people are protected in the physical sense and in the virtual sense. For the most part the lack of physical presence is difficult to identify the
Nowadays, “privacy” is becoming a popular conversation topic. Many people believe that if they do not do anything wrong in the face of technology and security, then they have nothing to hide. Professor Daniel J. Solove of George Washington University Law School, an internationally known expert in privacy law, wrote the article Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’, published in The Chronicle of Higher Education in May of 2011. Solove explains what privacy is and the value of privacy, and he insists that the ‘nothing to hide’ argument is wrong in this article. In the article, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’”, Daniel J. Solove uses ethos, pathos, and logos effectively by using strong sources, using
The freedom of information 2000 also gives the rights to an individual to be informed whether a public body holds personal information regarding
1984 , a novel based upon a society where there is hardly any privacy. Big Brother has surveillance all over the place so he can keep eyes on every person in Oceania. George Orwell, the author of the novel states about how technology is used for surveillance purposes and getting into people 's personal lives. That is also how our society works as well and we are living in it. Imagine being watched all day and night.
A major problem that has dominated the world in today’s society is the development of mass media. The mass media is said, “to be divided into two types: print and broadcast,” but the advancement of the internet became problematic. The internet allows the public to view the news by providing information between the citizens, and government faster than any other source. Consequently, this resulted in the decline of newspapers while more people began reading online. The negative effect of the internet is described as, “a wild west atmosphere” in which individuals may post whatever they wish online, “without professional, organizational, or legal concerns about its source” (Janda, Berry, Goldman, Schildkraut, and Manna, 2017, 148).
There’s a question Americans constantly ask themselves, is the government trustable? Many citizens would answer no because they believe that the government is constantly watching them. The privacy of American citizens is being violated by the GPS trackers in our phones that the government can see and monitor, how the government listens to our calls and how they store all our information. In the novel, 1984 by George Orwell, Winston explains how Big Brother is constantly watching them.
“Black Code: Surveillance, Privacy, and the Dark Side of the Internet,” written by Ronald J. Deibert, outlines different issues and benefits that have arised due to the growing use of the internet. Deibert begins his essay providing information about the internet such as the rapid growth of smartphones, how the internet has taken over most of societies lives, and key differences between previous technological innovations compared to the internet. He continues his essay by discussing the U.S.A. Patriot Act and how this law should be retracted based on the fact that various companies, like Google, can give the government our personal searches if they ask. Then, he talks about various types of cyber crimes and how we need stronger regulations to control the internet so these crimes would not be possible. Deibert concludes his essay explaining how the internet has provided many benefits in today’s nation, but the internet needs stricter regulations for our own protection.
She was a winner of 2016 Edelson PC Consumer Privacy Scholarship. She also a third year student at University of Notre Dame Law School. The article:” The IoT threat to privacy” published by TechCrunch in August 14th, 2016. In the modern world, technologies become essential to us. We connect everything to the internet, and Bannan discusses about the problem of having connected devices
The “Nothing-to-Hide Argument” Analyzed: In this rhetorical analysis, I will be taking a look at Daniel J. Solove’s essay “The Nothing-to-Hide Argument,” which is about privacy in the context of personal information and government data collection (Solove 734). Solove’s main argument in his essay is that the general public has a narrow perception of what privacy really is. The purpose behind his main argument is to expose the problems with the nothing-to-hide argument while presenting a way to challenge it for his target audience, government officials. Solove’s argument to his target audience is effective through his exemplary use of substance, organization, and style in his essay.
This completely takes away a person’s right to privacy. The government has access search anyone’s internet or library records. Taking away someone’s right to read what they please also takes away the freedom of writing about controversial topics since anyone who reads it is intimidated by the government (Jacobs and
Knowledge or Technology? As revealed within Fahrenheit 451, “If you hide your ignorance, no one will hit you and you’ll never learn” (Bradbury 45). When someone refuses to question their opinions and actions, they are blind to all other possibilities and outcomes. At a small scale, there is likely little impact from naivete.
Technology is growing at a fast pace and every day we see a new product or service that is available. Many times it is hard to even keep up with the latest phone, computer, game console, or software. There are so many different gadgets to choose from and even the internet is on information overload. As a result, we can no longer truly expect to have privacy.
"While the Internet-based economy provides many benefits, it also raises new concerns for maintaining the privacy of information. “Internet privacy is the privacy and security level of personal data published via the Internet. It is a broad term that refers to a variety of factors, techniques and technologies used to protect sensitive and private data, communications, and preferences.â€[1] As the federal government’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)[2] explains: Every day, billions of people around the world use the Internet to share ideas, conduct financial transactions, and keep in touch with family, friends, and colleagues. Users send and store personal medical data, business communications, and even intimate conversations over this global network.
" Our generation is one known for the internet. Many of us have never known a world without the internet. A good thing about that is that we stay informed on subjects from all around. A bad thing is cyber-bullying and negativity. But no matter what negative or positive place we withhold on the internet, one thing that stays the same is government control.
In America access to information is not absolute; laws are put in place where some information may be withheld from being freely disclosed. These laws ensure public security, safety, order as well as the protection of public health, morals and rights. However these laws do not restrict access to information that is related to the exploitation of human right as well as crimes against humanity (Right2know online