In other words, students that have good records and have good grades should be able to go. This would narrow the problem of safety concerns down. Having an option to go get food from a restaurant as a reward for good grades might encourage other students to try harder. Adrian Johnson stated, “Make off-campus lunch possible for upperclassmen” (16). Others may say, “By allowing kids to leave for lunch, they have more opportunities to eat healthier food” (“Top” 6).
Overall, there are definitely some aspects of school lunches which should not have to be changed, but general reform of school lunches for the health of the students is absolutely
To being with, students should be allowed to go off campus because we are reliable. I’ve heard from various adults that they use to go off campus for lunch, but what happened? Our generation did nothing wrong. Another thing is that if students are responsible enough to turn work in and get good grades, there should be nothing wrong with us going off campus for less than 30 minutes to get something to eat. However some people may argue that kids will skip if they leave campus, and yes in fact that will happen.
Intro Name:Jayson lostaunau in the article pro/con: Are our school lunches healthy enough by McClatchy-tribute news service the genera is real problems. The article is about the first lady's choice in making school lunches healthier.the thesis is we could have healthy lunch but we could have something else that is not so healthy but can keep us eating lunch,because if the lunch is nasty then we won't eat and get sick from not eating. If we have something that we like then we won't get sick. TAG Brief Summary b Thesis(Reason 1, reason 2, reason 3) Body Paragraph 1 Name:Esmeralda Prieto
Being aware of the health benefits and health hazards that come along with the food we choose to eat is a huge part of starting healthier eating habits. Children spend a multitude of hours in schools every day, and a lot of them eat two of the most important meals of their day in those schools. That is why it is important for parents and school administrators to take school lunches more seriously. Because after all, children are indeed the next generation of adults, and that is a fact that no one can disprove or argue with. And for those who choose to ignore it, in this case, ignorance is not bliss nor is it
Obviously the food is not bad enough to make us gravely sick; however, if they just figured out a way to improve nutrition and quality I wouldn’t have to write this paper. An article in the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine suggests that food service workers, parents, and children become educated on the preparation and consumption of healthy food. Especially if the staff was educated on better preparation of food, meals would be better. The same article also suggests offering more vegan and vegetarian meals for students. In my opinion, as long as those vegetarian meals were in good shape I would definitely eat them instead of what the school has to offer now, and this is coming from a guy who loves a nice big steak over any
With the money that the school makes, they can buy better technology for the students like computers, tablets, e-readers, etc. People think that it’s not good to sell fast food at schools mostly because it affects the student’s health. That’s why it has some advantages like the students will actually eat the food, students will learn how to be more responsible, and the school will make money out of
Students may enjoy a sweet treat during the school day, but others are thinking differently, that the junk food should be kicked out and replaced with healthier foods. Even though a healthier lunch program would be expensive and take some time to get used to, schools should use it. Providing students unhealthy foods can lead to obesity, it can cause early unhealthy habits; and students should have enough time to eat these healthy foods at lunch. The surplus of junk food available to students in public schools has the potential to lead to a high rate of obesity in youth which can have very many negative effects on students physical health.
the program has worked and is liked, and 3. they help protect scheduled vacations on the calendars. First this paragraph will explain to the reader that E-days save money. One reason is because on regular school days the school has to pay for the school bus drivers and the gas that goes into the school bus. I know this is true because since no children get picked up, no gas on the busses will be running and the bus drivers wouldn’t need to be paid because they aren’t picking anyone up.
“Healthy school lunch means students are getting the nourishment they need to power their minds and bodies to learn. ”-Unknown. This quote is relevant because students need good, healthy food to be able to focus in class. When the students have eaten a good healthy food they won’t be worrying about when they’re going to get their next meal. The food needs to actually look edible for kids to even think about eating it.
The kids stomachs are desperate but not desperate enough to eat the school lunch. The Healthy slop makes stomachs quiver in fear. Michelle Obama has put into use the Hunger, Hunger free Kids Act, that will help feed kids from low income families with healthy lunches .
Hook and topic sentence To Begin With, having Off-Campus lunch for middle school students has many benefits for students and teachers. Students will be able to focus because they ate. Teachers won’t have to always tell the students to pay attention in class because they got all of their energy out and students won’t be so hungry. In an article from DailyAmerican.com Tyler Sanners states, that “I believe that students should be able to leave school grounds for lunch only if they have transportation and parental consent.” Cafeteria food is expensive, and doesn’t fill your stomach.
Over the years the school lunches in america has changed drastically.15 to 20 percent of the products in the program are purchased by the USDA.The school lunch system in America has changed over the years in many ways. The school lunch program started when Harry S. Truman in 1946 was president as a way to help every child have a very nutritious lunch while in school. Studies showed that people believe that if they had the energy they needed to get them through the day it most likely would have came from a nutritional lunch. Over the years people were concerned about the amount of fat the school lunches and breakfasts were providing for the children. Many children have unhealthy eating habits through the high fat pizzas, burgers, and French
Government Lunches: A Foundation Crumbled "You aren't you when you're hungry. " The slogan of the popular Snickers bar has captured the reason school lunches were created, because without proper nutrition, the distraction of hunger can be an obstacle to focused learning. School lunches have been a controversial topic ever since its inception during World War II, when "many young men had been rejected from the draft due to medical conditions caused by childhood malnutrition" ("The History of the School Lunch Program"). Over the years, the program has undergone many bills and amendments, expanding on the original foundation laid by President Truman. Many would argue that most of these changes have been positive and have lead to dramatic health improvements in children.
Even though many aren’t, some children are vegetarians or they only eat low-fat foods. Some children may only eat some of their lunches because they don’t eat meat, or they don’t like all of the calories. School cafeterias should offer a vegan lunch, for health reasons. First and foremost, most schools don’t provide a separate lunch line for other people, like vegans and children who are on diets which they should. Vegans don’t eat meats, and some of them and other people who may have diabetes, don’t need all of the fried foods because it is bad for them.