RESEARCH METHODS & LEGAL WRITING
REPORT WRITING ON :
ANTIQUITY OF THE OFFICIAL SECRETS ACT 1923
AND ITS DELINQUENCY
SUBMITTED TO :- SUBMITTED BY :-
DR. ABHIJIT VASMATKAR GAYATRI ANUGHA J
SYMBIOSIS LAW COLLEGE ROLL NO. 37
INTRODUCTION :
The definition of secret in general terms is something that is kept or meant to be kept unknown or unseen by others . And secrets are of various kinds some are accessible some are not . Here in this research we will be dealing with an act which deals with protecting the significant secrets which if given away can cause loss not just to the country but also in the bigger picture also
…show more content…
It has to be kept in mind that the act was made by the British government in India during their rule in the country but now after so many amendments the act has now taken a rigid structure which is given ample protection to the official secrets of the government . To further conclude the act has been almost replaced by the right to information act which came in 2005 . In the present situation the act covers and gives protection to the government secrets . Above everything there is only one thing to be considered about the official secret act 1923 is its interpretation . It is very important in a country like India where the crime compared to the population is equally high and the bureaucracy has still a very big part to play.it is very important to see that the act does not fall under a wrong shadow . In the previous history of this act there have been number of misinterpretation which lead to arrests and cases of innocent people . This shows the power of the act which is still prevailing in the country . When it comes to giving away the secrets under the official secrets act the bureaucracy and media has given out number of information and named it “freedom of expression”. This act right now plays a very major role by still having right to information under its purview . The official secrets act 1923 has a authority to have declare a RTI null and void . Though it is believed that the RTI has taken away the lam light from the official secret act but the truth remains is that RTI is still under the observation of the official secrets act . A major concern is the similar issue as the said rule can stand in between the citizen and the information where any power can take undue advantage . Overall conclusion has that the official secrets act is powerful yet helpless in few situations . The only thing to note is no act can or should exploit the fundamental rights of the constitution which are
The British Parliament’s first actions that could be considered to set the stage for punitive measures is the Declaratory Act that was debated and enacted in conjunction with the repeal of the Stamp Act. The resistance to the Stamp Act was widespread and had the members of Parliament concerned with whether it was treason or the beginnings of rebellion against the empire. The decreased trade that resulted from boycotts of English goods in part contributed to a depression affecting English merchants. As a result, the new leader of the Parliament Rockingham was faced with a situation where Parliament felt it needed to assert its authority over the Colonies while finding a way to repeal the Stamp Act to reestablish the flow of trade. The resultant
I mean this in the sense were it will be hard to prove that this act does in fact invade the privacy of individuals. Critics, believe that since intelligence can be gathered secretly with little oversight, officials can easily abuse this power and can falsely charge innocent
The 17th Amendment of the Constitution once it was ratified by a majority of states in 1913 changed the way Senators were elected in the voting process. Prior to the ratification of the amendment, the founding fathers saw it fit that the state legislators be invested with the authority to assign states their chosen Senators. The debate on whether the amendment was significant or not has been argued on among scholars and critics alike. One can say the fact that a debate exists at all answers that question itself. The hysteria behind the attachment of the 17th amendment is that it sets precedent for future changes to laws concerning the balance of power between the states and our central government established by the countries Founding Fathers.
In a disturbed area, the civil law has to be followed an order U/s. 144 of the criminal procedure code must be in force before the powers U/s. 4 of the AFSPA can be exercised. Before exercising the powers under the acts, a warning is required to be given to those are violating the law. The central government had appointed a five-member committee headed by the Supreme Court Judge B.P. Jeevan Reddy to examine whether the AFSPA is required. The entire report has not been made public, but various non-governmental organizations have selectively quoted a portion of it (which was available on the web site of a prominent news paper): “….for whatever reasons, (AFSPA) has become a symbol of oppression, an object of hate and an instrument of discrimination
Clients have their individuals’ rights for privacy thwarted in a way that although the release of customer’s information is to be used for the identification of possible terrorists, there is no impediment that the very information is actually utilized for other reasons, including nefarious ones. This Act fundamentally ignores some of important privacy laws and gives to the American government unprecedented surveillance powers in regards to eavesdropping in order to gather intelligence and to enforce laws. While it is clear that the balance of power has shifted towards law enforcement , it is also clear that the surveillance does not end within districts or township libraries. Quite the contrary it has reached ones’ residential doorways and this can indeed damage the reputation of the United States as the leader of human
The Stamp Act was established by the Parliament in 1765. The tax was made to pay off a large burden that Britain owed due to the fact that they had recently fought in the French and Indian war. When the English sent troops to the colonies their debt increased, England getting deeper into debt. The Stamp Act taxed all sorts of paper products bought by the colonists. Almanacs, pamphlets, newspapers, advertisements, marriage licenses, and even playing cards were all taxed.
The Commoners and Wealth Reaction to the Stamp Act March 22, 1765 a new tax passed called the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act was to help British troops settled, I the colonies during the 7 years of war. A tax represented by a stamp on many papers,documents, and playing cards. Stamp Act was imposed by the British government and without approval of the colonial legislatures. The word spread around colonial families.
During the 1760’s, Britain needed to find a way to pay off their debt. This led to a reform that in part launched a plan designed by George Greenville (Schulz, 2013). Greenville’s plan was to implement acts that would help to pay off the nation’s debt. New acts, such as the Sugar, the Quartering, and the Stamp Act had colonists far and wide upset with Parliament. While each of these acts were disliked by colonists, none was as damaging as the Stamp Act.
Government policies dramatically changed in the 1920s which were a consequence to the Treaty of Versailles since the period was so soon after the war and many of the policies concerned post-war aspects. The Allies have varied views and in many cases Britain is the country to be in a different position in terms of the perceived aftermath of the Treaty of Versailles. The Dawes Plan in 1924 was a policy agreed by the Allies to cut the total amount of reparations and allow Germany a realistic time frame to repay the amounts owed to them. It also proposed the removal of French troops from the Ruhr in Germany as the reparations which they were demanding payment of were no longer needed to be paid. The reparation put Germany in a very vulnerable and weak position within Europe and opened them to the feared threat of communism from Soviet Russia.
During times of war, there is a national crisis to protect the country and the citizens living in it. Secrecy of military endeavors is of utmost importance, and disclosing facts about these topics could lose a war or risk millions of lives. The government takes away people 's rights in order to protect the country. Many people argue against the suspension of the writ of Habeas Corpus, and the Espionage and Sedition acts.
The “Nothing-to-Hide Argument” Analyzed: In this rhetorical analysis, I will be taking a look at Daniel J. Solove’s essay “The Nothing-to-Hide Argument,” which is about privacy in the context of personal information and government data collection (Solove 734). Solove’s main argument in his essay is that the general public has a narrow perception of what privacy really is. The purpose behind his main argument is to expose the problems with the nothing-to-hide argument while presenting a way to challenge it for his target audience, government officials. Solove’s argument to his target audience is effective through his exemplary use of substance, organization, and style in his essay.
Governments keep things classified in fear that if they tell the citizens it would cause rebellions or conflict. Wars are fought over conflicting opinions killing innocent people on either side. Countries like North Korea keep their citizens secluded from the outside world like the government in Montag’s world keeps people from information about the war that is going on. In some countries, freedom of speech and freedom of the press is limited. In those countries, the people only know what the government allows them to know.
The Owen Glass Federal Act of 1913 was made to protect the economy by setting a Federal Reserve System. An operation that is supervised under a board in Washington D.C. They have the power to set the interest rates which is charged to the other banks by the reserve banks. The objective included of financial Danes and availability of cash from a money reserve.
Every government around the world is slightly different, nevertheless they all have one concern in common, secrets. The government around the world and the government described by George Orwell in 1984 are unquestionably much similar. In both governments described there are secrets held from the public. These secrets are held from us on the grounds that the government believes that they are protecting us from something terribly frightening or harmful.
Intro People expect their government to have their best interest in mind and always protect its citizens, but what about when it doesn’t? There are dozens are possibly hundreds of shady events that our government covers up. People believe that the government is hiding aliens, technology capable of time travel, and even Walt Disney’s head frozen in cryostat. Yet for now those are simply just conspiracies.