In the past days, weeks, months even years, Mindanao is known to be a chaotic place where they asked for a separate government over the national government. Many people have been fighting for their independence and hoping for a peaceful environment but it just worsens. For more than 40 years minority Muslim groups, indigenous ethnic people known collectively as Moros have fought for self-determination. The Mindanao conflict, expressed in Muslim armed resistance against the Philippine state, has deep historical roots and resolution is definitely not easy. The armed conflict which has been fought under two competing banners of national self-determination on the one hand, and protection of state rights on the other hand, has taken thousands of …show more content…
The right to self-determination is the collective right of a people to determine its own future, free of any outside interference or coercion. It includes the right to determine this people’s political status and to freely pursue its economic, social, spiritual and cultural development. In connection to the definition of the right to self-determination the Muslim people had clearly act to every word of self-determination. They really do exercise their right to self-determination but have not yet been officially recognized as a separate government of the Philippines. It is still on the process of recognizing their request to be separate and to have its own law and governance and which we cannot interfere their own decisions and its economic …show more content…
First, the low degree of political autonomy which would enable Muslims to protect, safeguard, and defend their culture, identity, language, ways of life, and religion. Second, the inability of the state to adequately meet the basic socioeconomic needs of the Muslim community. Third, the widespread belief among Muslims that they have been victims of the state’s systematic socio-cultural discrimination and politico-economic exploitation, an impression that has been reflected in the present-day economic, political, and social marginalization of the people. The present political governance structure has not only rendered the Moros and other minority groups powerless but also excluded them as part of the Filipino nation. The lack of power sharing due to the concentration of political powers on the few ruling elite either from the central government in Manila or Mindanao’s regional administrative centers has been a constant source of discontentment and frustration of people in the periphery. The increased despair, misery, and frustration especially for those people in the most marginalized communities and regions in Mindanao have fuelled armed
Mary Dudizaik discusses the 1947 President’s Committee on Civil Rights report called To Secure These Rights written by Harry S. Truman, civil rights abuses were in the spotlight and were wanted to be redressed due to three main reasons, not having moral protection, national civil security, and economic discrimination reasons. These reasons were heavily highlighted and shown throughout the time being of the injustice. Although each presidential administration from Truman to Johnson had their own specific carry outs, the general factors regarding all of the administrations concluded the following by addressing those three main reasons. In this aspect, I believe that each of the authorities during their respected times did stem from the three
Hi Simeon, The Bills of Rights was put into place to protect the rights of the people (Patterson, 2013). Without the Bill of Rights there would be much chaos in America. Do you think we are slowly losing our rights? Are not our rights to worship being placed into question? I think that the Bills of Rights was a great move of our forefahers, I don 't think they could foresee the complexity it would soon bring.
Since England did not listen to our demands we brought them a revolution. We brought them a revolution because King George the III kept putting taxation on us and we did not even have a say in it. This taxation made the rebels even more angry at the King, but the king would keep putting new taxations on stuff and taking the old taxes away. The King could do this because of all the power he had with no restrictions, and it didn't matter what the people said because he had all the power. Once everybody had enough of the King and all his power, the 2nd Continental Congress got together and wrote the Declaration of Independence to set us apart from England and the King during the revolution.
The ratification of the US Bill of Rights took place in 1789. The Bill of Rights supply citizens of the US with inalienable rights that they are born with and acquire if they immigrate. Since it was ratified, there have been several occasions in which these rights have been infringed upon during times of conflict, in which the United States government attempts to shield the nation from conflicting issues inside or even outside the country because of fear. The government believes that this unconstitutional action to restrict citizens’ rights must be done to protect citizens of the United States, but in an attempt to protect others, many become mistreated.
Natural rights are the 3 things people naturally should have such as life liberty and property. an example of one is the U.S Declaration of Independence, the document includes all of the natural rights, social contract is the idea that countries do what in the best interest of the government 's citizens, and the citizens give up some rights. Usually all governments follow the social contract but you can see aspects in the declaration of independence. Civic virtue is that morally right to involve citizens with the involvement of the society like voting. A examples of document that include civic virtue is the constitution in the U.S. Popular sovereignty is when citizens vote on who they want their representative to be so they are a part of the
The Delcaration of Independence covers religion, in my opinion, because they wanted everyone in The United States of America to be able to have their own freedom of choice. Whatever religion you decided that you wanted to be, that was up to you. It wasn 't forced upon you by anyone, and you were able to make this decision on your own. I think this is a good thing because not everyone feels the same way about religion, everyone has different opinions over it, and there are even some that don 't believe in any of it at all. No matter what you decide though, it 's your choice, and no one gets to make that decision for you.
Jovania Andrade Social Ethics William Behun “The Declaration of Independence of the United States of America draws on the theory of Natural Law in its opening passage: We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights." “What does it mean for rights to be unalienable? What does it mean for rights to be natural? Is this different from claiming that these rights have a source in a divine creator?”
In the audio file we hear about women finding independence by making their own money through work, many found specific reasons why and some were they just because they wanted to be. Women were chosen to work at these factors because the owners felt as if it would be too difficult to have families do the work and they did not want to pay the males a high wage, their ideal employee was single women ages 18 to 25 (A Taste of Independence). The women seemed happy upon their arrival and agreed to all conditions; however, over time they sought a better work environment which lead to some negative changes. Thomas Dublin tells us that the New England farm women seemed happy to help when they first began work, the seasoned ladies would teach new employees
Proposed by Representative Jim McGovern in 2011, the People’s Rights Amendment would ratify the Constitution’s meaning of the word people. The definition of the word person is a “natural human”, meaning not a group of people. This amendment would overturn the Citizens United decision, which allowed companies to have the same rights of free speech as people. McGovern declared that, “My amendment clarifies that corporations, whether they are for-profit or non-profit entities are not people with constitutional rights.” While many support this amendment, such as the Free Speech for the People group, others say that this amendment will allow the government to take advantage of companies and organizations.
Under the Bill of Rights, in the first amendment comes the right of the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of pursuing happiness. These rights are equal for every individual and no one can take away one's rights or freedom. We don't had to fight for these rights. These rights are close to us since we are born. However, there should be some restriction on the right to speech, religion, and press.
As Albert J. Beveridge pointed out in Document B, “would not the people of the Philippines prefer the just, human, civilizing government of this republic to the savage, bloody rule… from which we have saved them?” Just, human, civilizing? Strict, biased, Christianizing was more like it. In these islands, the United States of America once again made the same mistake it had made with the Native Americans. Determined that there way was the best way, ‘the slaughter of the Filipinos’ (Doc.
The 2nd Amendment Right has been one of the most controversial liberties that has brought many opposing views with it. Gun control has become a vastly argued topic that has left the federal government with many ideas on it. The United States is the leader in per capita gun deaths. Just in 2016 there were 58,428 firearm incidents with 15,077 of those resulting in a death. The current year, 2017, there were almost 16,000 firearm incidents within the first 4 months of the year.
The Declaration of Independence encompasses several major philosophical arguments that serve as the foundation for the American Revolution and the establishment of the United States. These arguments include the idea of natural rights, social contract theory, the right to revolution, and the role of government. One of the central philosophical arguments in the Declaration is the concept of natural rights. It asserts that all individuals possess inherent and unalienable rights, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The document argues that these rights are not granted by any government or authority but are derived from nature or a higher power.
When it comes to policing there is a huge struggle power struggle between individual rights and public order. You want to keep individual rights, but you also want to keep public order while keeping the public safe. It may seem hard to keep the balance between these two, but doing so is of utter importance. Here are some examples of why it can be hard to balance individual rights and public order when dealing with policing.
INTRODUCTION Self-Determination Theory (SDT) was conceived by Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan. This theory is concerned with human motivation, personality, and optimal functioning. For the purpose of SDT and work motivation, motivation is considered the core of biological, cognitive, and social regulation. Instead of just looking at the amount of motivation, self-determination theory focuses on different types of motivation.