Though I believe that books contain important topics that can spark discussions of values in classrooms, I agree with Prose that teachers shouldn’t use books as a way to explicitly teach students outside values. I believe that in doing this, teachers are distracting students from the writing’s content and structure. Teachers should teach literature for what it is, not for what values they can loosely connect to it. When I was a freshman in high school, we read The Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger. The book centered around a mentally unstable, socially isolated teen named Holden Caulfield.
Kidwatching is an interesting and helpful strategy for me to understand my focus students’ literacy behavior. This observation strategy is an ideal way for me to get to know my students’ literacy tendencies and interests. There are many students who do not feel comfortable with their reading and writing skills, which causes the students to lack interest in all literature. After watching and interviewing my focus students, I learned that not all students like to read and write. Additionally, I learned that I must always be flexible in the classroom because things may not go as planned and I may have to quickly adjust.
Don’t over think too many things when writing. If you just jot things down in the end when you put everything together it will all make sense. Another piece of advice would be to always ask your English teachers for help whatever you need help with weather with reading or writing. These teachers are paid for helping you become a better reader and writer. I would say that the hardest thing reading to me is poems and plays.
The fact alone that he had a dislike for books does not constitute that he would be greater at teaching them. His overall experience with literature and his unconventional way of coming to love literature is what makes him have an advantage as a teacher. Not all students learn the same way. There are those that need a more hands on approach, where as some that can learn by simply listening to the teachers lectures. The ability to put yourself in the shoes of that child and figure out a different way to teach them is a major advantage.
In her essay "Does Texting Affect Writing? ", Michaela Cullington presents her argument that texting does not impact formal writing written by students. She discusses the concerns presented by many people about how texting language can transfer into writing, but through the use of personal experiences and credible sources she discusses how this is not true. Her use of multiple different studies and situations help boost her argument and allow the reader to truly see how students actually do formal writing. She presents a strong argument as to why those who believe students don't have the control and knowledge to write formally, instead of with text speak, are wrong.
To me, that’s kind of hard because I’m not a big fan of making essays. I feel like this quote is the most important one to me because it doesn’t defend me. When assigned an essay many teachers will tell you to avoid "I", "you", and "we". This can be a little difficult for me when writing an essay because I try to express my opinion. If I'm not able to state my reasoning, it's much harder because they aren’t many words to help my
Not only kids want to read them, but grown ups too it isn't fair that they ban it for everyone. For those that it upsets shouldn't matter, they do have a variety of choices to pick from, rather than books they don't want to read. Many can't understand books others read and want to read what they want. I think that it might be the biggest problem for a lot, banning books that aren't a problem unless those that don't like it read it, then it might be their problem but other than that it should be such a bother, there is so much more to pick through. The last reason banning books is a problem around the world is how it isn't hurting anyone unless they read it and it's those that aren't such a big fan of them.
Profanity is inappropriate in a school setting so why should students be assigned to read a book that contains it? Most learn curse words at a very young age, and the foul language displayed is not used to promote vulgarity but rather to add a sense of realism to the narrative. The use of profanity is a reason why some object to The Secret Life of Bees. Ian Warwick and Peter Aggleton write about how students often feel bullied when
Some books do have profanity in them which children really should not read. That can be easily fixed by taking out those parts, but leaving in the negative and real world parts so children can learn about the real world early in life and they will learn the difference between good and bad actions. Books should not be banned; banned books can have an important lesson for kids to learn for the life they have ahead of them. Some people believe books should be banned from society, because some books have profanity. Correspondingly vulgar language is everywhere, children know
Schopenhauer’s belief is far from the complete denouncement of reading but is rather the claim that reading is a boundary to complete mastery of a subject. It is clear that thinking for oneself forms a purposeful understanding of the subject in the way the person wishes to learn it. It can be asserted that reading is able to form learning, however, reading provides an indefinite amount of thoughts, rendering the mind unable to process for itself, but rather for the reading. This indefinite amount makes it hard for any purposeful learning to occur. Thinking for yourself allows you to identify one thought to base the rest of the material on.