ipl-logo

An Eye For Wealth Analysis

807 Words4 Pages

1] Genesis 1.1) An Eye for an Eye

In the bible it is clearly said that the main purpose of money is to avoid violence and mostly revenge. Money is used to repair damage one has done. It is the famous law: “an eye for an eye” (Exodus 21:24-25). Now everybody understands it as a rude and ruthless law from elderly human beings who were not able to have a proper court of law. Nowadays, people think that an eye for an eye means if one takes an eye, the community should take the eye of the convict. However in the Bible it is surely not the case. According to the explanations, someone who took an eye from somebody else’s head should give back the value of the eye taken. It can be compared to the remedies and damages in law Court nowadays. (citer …show more content…

For the society now it is the main cause of the reason why Jews are related to money, it is true but not the only reason. What does the Torah say regarding loans and lending? It is said: “When you lend money to My people, to the poor person [who is] with you, you shall not behave toward him as a lender; you shall not impose interest upon him” (Exodus, 22:24). It is clearly shown that lending money is forbidden among the Jewish society but providing loans is compulsory. Moreover rich Jews should take care of the Jewish society and mostly to poor people. This is where Tsedaka is born. Tsedaka is a Jewish law that forces Jews to give 10% of their wages to poor people. Through “My people” it is understood that lending is just forbidden among the Jewish Society but not for outsiders, this is why in the future they were able to charge interest. (citer Rabbi …show more content…

This lesson is very simple. You should adapt yourself to the hosting country. Jews should not try to change the behavior or tradition of the country where they lived. They should adapt their way of life, learn the language and be a part of the society. Nevertheless it does not mean that they have to forget their traditions but compromise them. Nowadays the biggest companies in the world like McDonald’s apply this theory. The recipe of the food provided in an English McDonald is not the same as the one provided in America. Indeed tastes are different and they had to adapt to the culture of the hosting country. Moreover this is this capability of adaptation that made company famous and successful. (citer

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of 'The Gospel Of Wealth' By Andrew Carnegie

    149 Words  | 1 Pages

    The “Gospel of Wealth” pushes philanthropic ideas in order to settle the issues of wealth inequality at this time. This document argues that it is the duty of

    Read More

  • Code Of Hammurabi Dbq

    865 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Document E, law 196 says “If a man has knocked out the eye of a free man, his eye shall be knocked out.” This law is fair, it has an equal punishment and the person doing the crime should feel the same way. Document E, Law 199, says “If he has knocked out the eye of a slave… he shall pay half his value.” The slave is property and needs to be paid back for the damage and the one who did the crime can’t just say sorry. On Document E, law 215 it says, “If a surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on the body of a freeman…and saves the man’s life, he shall receive 10 shekels of silver.”

    Read More

  • Why Is The Code Of Hammurabi Unfair

    696 Words  | 3 Pages

    “An eye for an eye…” is a known paraphrase of one of Hammurabi’s Code. Dating from 1760 B.C, the Code of Hammurabi was set forth by King Hammurabi of Babylon, who ruled from 1792-1750 BC. Hailed as the first code in Western history, the Code of Hammurabi consisted of 282 laws preserved on a seven-foot-high black stone stele. Hammurabi’s Code was fair because it maintained order and justice for Mesopotamians. Thought some of punishment might seem unfair, they were just because there was a possibility that certain crimes were committed less frequently because of Hammurabi’s Code.

    Read More

  • King Hammurabi History

    382 Words  | 2 Pages

    My reaction to code of Hammurabi is that it is wrong to have this mentality for some types of crimes. For instance it would be wrong to chop the hand off of a thief because what he/she is taking can be brought back or replaced. Sometimes the thief will steal for basic things like food. This eye for an eye can be used for certain murder cases. For example if a person kills another person just for the benefit of that individual.

    Read More

  • Review Of Andrew Carnegie's Essay 'The Gospel Of Wealth'

    1142 Words  | 5 Pages

    In bestowing charity, the main consideration should be to help those who help themselves. It provides part of the means by which those who desire to improve may do so; to give to those who desire to rise the aids by which they may rise. (Andrew Carnegie) In the essay “The Gospel of Wealth” by Andrew Carnegie he gives his vision on how the gap between rich and poor could be closed. He argued that if people with incredible amounts of wealth were forced or were opportunistic about giving away huge percentages of their wealth to charity.

    Read More

  • Carnegie's The Gospel Of Wealth

    174 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the Gospel of Wealth article, Carnegie argues that the best way on helping society was to help improve people themselves. Carnegie did not believe that the rich simply give the money directly towards the poor. Instead, he wanted to set up intuitions for the poor to allow people to help there self. According to Carnegie, “ [T]he main consideration should be to help those who will help themselves; to provide part of the means by which those who desire to improve may do so...” (Carnegie, 1889).

    Read More

  • Ap Lang Keller Chapter 1 Dialectical Journal

    291 Words  | 2 Pages

    “The law is not being fulfilled unless it is obeyed as a way of giving and showing love to God and others.” (pg. 146) Money being a tool, does not define who you are. It doesn’t matter who you are, rich or poor, Christ came to serve

    Read More

  • The Wealth And Poverty Of Nations Summary

    1459 Words  | 6 Pages

    In David S. Landes book, The Wealth and Poverty of Nations, he decides to take a historical approach on the reasons behind why some people remain poor and how others are so rich by trying to comprehend the reasons that lead to advances in economies and modernization in certain regions around the world over the past few decades. In other words by asking how we have come to where we are today in the sense of making, getting and spending. Throughout the book, Landes talks about how we live in a world filled with inequality and diversity therefore leading to classifying those who are poor and unable to afford medical health care living in the North and the wealthy in the South. David S. Landes aim was to basically make people aware of how it is actually geography that is responsible for this division between countries that have caused a lot of hardship for the unprivileged people by making it impossible for them to improve economically as a result of their geographical location on the map.

    Read More

  • Wealth Gap Analysis

    489 Words  | 2 Pages

    As outlined in chapter 10 of the course text, inequality in housing and wealth is a major problem. The United States is described to be the most unequal countries in the western hemisphere. But with the inequalities when it comes to wealth, the United States is one of the richest countries in the world. Wealth is the sum total of a person’s assets. These assets include, cash in the bank and value of all properties, not only land but houses, cars, stocks, and bonds, and retirements savings.

    Read More

  • Wealth In America

    267 Words  | 2 Pages

    Wealth is a fortune you not acquire yourself but instead the money works for you. Many people start companies, make it big, then sell their business for a fortune. With this new fortune many high class people invest and save their money for generations. In Class in America it sates that, "The wealthiest 1 percent of the American population holds 34 percent of the total nation wealth" ( pg 179). The upper class people with billions of dollars and most of the countries money are called the one percent.

    Read More

  • The Canterbury Tales The Reeve's Tale

    809 Words  | 4 Pages

    An Eye for an Eye During the 1380’s a miller, who is the person who grinds flour, only made twenty dollars a year, while the cost of flour was 56 cents per pound. This might make it difficult to stay honest, because stealing 40 pounds of flour would be worth more than he made in a year. Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales, The Reeve’s Tale, is a story told by Oswald, the reeve, because he is angry about the miller’s tale. Oswald decides to tell this tale to embarrass the miller.

    Read More

  • How Does Daisy Fail In The Great Gatsby

    1955 Words  | 8 Pages

    Money is just paper currency, yet it tears families apart, brings out the greed in people, and abandons morals. Stained with rapacity, money makes even the strongest fall victim to the dark evils. The valuable necessity can buy every tangible objects available. Society used money as the foundation for the social rankings. Unfortunately many forget that money and status are not the only things in life.

    Read More

  • Underpinnings And Effectiveness Of Carnegie's Gospel Of Wealth

    605 Words  | 3 Pages

    Underpinnings and Effectiveness of Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth” In Andrew Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth”, Carnegie proposed a system of which he thought was best to dispose of “surplus wealth” through progress of the nation. Carnegie wanted to create opportunities for people “lift themselves up” rather than directly give money to these people. This was because he considered that giving money to these people would be “improper spending”.

    Read More

  • Carnegie Conwell And Alger Advocates Of Wealth For All

    1696 Words  | 7 Pages

    Carnegie, Conwell, and Alger Advocates of Wealth for All During the late nineteenth century, a form of Social Darwinism emerged called the Gospel of Wealth also known as the Success Gospel. Social Darwinism is “Herbert Spencer’s adaptation of Charles Darwin’s concepts of natural selection and “survival of the fittest” as it applies to human society” (Nash p. 417). Social Darwinists believed that the social order was the product of the natural selection of the individuals that were best suited for the existing living conditions. These individuals were white, Anglo-Saxon, wealthy men.

    Read More

  • Role Of Revenge In Criminal Justice

    955 Words  | 4 Pages

    Sides have been taken and arguments have been made. The lowering of ones moral standards in order to achieve justice when the law fails indicates revenge is not only unjust but immoral. Some may argue that revenge is just because we gain personal satisfaction that is important emotionally. They argue that revenge is helpful for their healing process and

    Read More

More about An Eye For Wealth Analysis

Open Document