All, but one juror voted that the boy was guilty. For this reason, all the jurors had to sit down in the court room and discuss into more detail about the murder case. Having 12 jurors is a faster and easier way than having 1 juror to come to an agreement if the boy is guilty in this murder case. The first juror is the foreman. Outside of the court, he is an assistant football coach.
Protest leaders like Rosa Parks, Nelson Mandela and John Lennon all had the same goal; to bring attention to the injustice taking place in society. Nico Woodward talks about how protest is good for democracy because it shows the injustices and disagreements in the government (1); consequently, it is crucial to bring disagreements to the forefront of society so that everyone 's thoughts can be heard. Most of the time, minority groups that struggle to have their voices heard because there are outnumbered, and it is important that these groups are heard and not marginalized. People can be unaware of major issues because it is not something that they experience daily; therefore, it is pivotal that oustanding problems are brought front and center. Colin Kaepernick’s protest
All things considered, if the verdict came back guilty the nineteen-year-old man would be sentenced to death by the electric chair. Without delay, the jurors came to their decision and eleven of the twelve jurors voted guilty, but to be able to prosecute the nineteen-year-old man, the jurors needed to be concordant with each other. Nevertheless, the jurors went to a discrete room to discuss whether the nineteen-year-old man was guilty or not. In act II of Twelve Angry Men, Juror #8 discussed with the rest of the jurors as to why he believed that the man was not guilty in his eyes. With the more corroboration that Juror #8 gave, the more jurors began to believe that the man might not be guilty but instead innocent.
As read in Maxwell’s book, some companies take advantage of people by going against the Golden Rule with still following the laws. One such company or industry is the gun company or industry; which was why Nick was confident from the beginning that he could somehow sway the jury towards his side of the debate. The law is very rational which requires reason from people to deliberate and decide what the verdict would be. However, “it is an empirical fact that human beings are both feeling and reason beings” (Thiroux and Krasemann 148). Consequently, Nick gambled that for the particular jury in this movie, they are more inclined towards the emotion spectrum of the emotion versus reason argument.
12 Angry Men The play is set in a New York City Court of Law jury room in 1957. We discover this is a murder case and that, if discovered blameworthy, the compulsory sentence for the charged is capital punishment. After these guidelines, the members of the jury enter. Every one of the legal hearers assume the conspicuous blame of the litigant, whom we learn has been blamed for slaughtering his dad. The twelve take a seat and a vote is taken.
However, all who oppose the use of jury in civil trial do not dare to oppose the system in criminal proceedings, as this ensures that justice is served. Matthew Reger, member of the American Bar Association’s Georgia office, noted that jury trial has both darker and brighter sides. The success of jury trial largely depends on how the institution plays its role in practice. It can either help the court, or can severely harm its credibility and take the judiciary to worse condition. He also observed that, if the rules are enforced and the procedures implemented justly and fairly, then the jury system will have a better chance of success.
If there was a crime committed in the community, the accused was brought to a jury. The judge presided over the trial and served as a legal expert… The jury heard the events and accused guilty or not-guilty (Is The American Jury System Still A Good Idea? ).” Jury trials should remain an option because because we as Americans have the right of the seventh , jurors are only told 100 percent of proven information, and the jurors are not influenced by media, people, or unproven information to make a decision and the jury is chosen for specific reasons to help lower the chances of discrimination against races and/or ethnicities. One reason the government should keep the jury system is because the Seventh Amendment supports the idea of keeping the jury system around. The Seventh Amendment guarantees that a persons accused of a crime can have a trial by jury .Getting rid of the jury system completely disown the Seventh Amendment also the Seventh Amendment protects us and or the persons getting
Corruption undermines democracy and governance The concept of the public trust relates back to the origins of democratic government and its idea that within the public lays the true power and future of a society. Citizens elect the ones they found most suited and the trust they place in its officials must therefore be respected. Vote buying at elections harms the democratic process and justices are challenged, when people are able to bribe their way out of trouble. Anti- Corruption Policy It is our policy to conduct business in an honest and ethical manner. We are committed to acting professionally, fairly, and with integrity in all our business dealings and relationships wherever we operate and implementing and enforcing effective systems to counter corruption and bribery.
The government closer to the people when it becomes more responsive. Democracies are more and more in the principles of subsidiarity, which is why every government function to perform this task effectively governs the lowest level of performance should be able to be. In the case of a decentralized federal system, or political, as well as other benefits of democracy multiple layers of government, when they are there. No women in the basement of the election office and not play a role in the political life and political leaders, including young people, it can be training for employment Stadium. Minimum of democracy and citizens to play an active role in public affairs gives way to a questioning of the local authorities more easily, and they are doing their interests and concerns, monitoring and democratic citizenship skills and values learning.
The jury must reach its verdict by considering only the evidence introduced in court and the directions of the judge.” Functions and duties of a juror. The movie twelve angry men set the scene of a typical murder trial of a young man who supposedly murdered his father. Jurors are selected from various backgrounds, cultures and professions. Twelve angry men showed the diversity of people ranging from bankers, poker player, parent and those raised in the not so sophisticated lifestyle of the ghettos. Those men were bestowed the opportunity to deliberate on the fate of this eighteen-year-old man.