Universal Human Rights Are Fundamental To Civilization
Dylan Cicotte
English 12
Zarzycki/Period 6
2/18/18
All humans regardless of where they live and how they live must be guaranteed basic and globally understood human rights. While it is insane to believe all countries and cultures must adhere to a singular and absolute definition of human rights, it is similarly insane to believe that certain rights are not guaranteed to a person due to the culture and/or country they live in.
Human rights as we know it should be a globally protected and understood issue. In some countries, a fair trial is not a fundamental right nor is free speech itself. It is irrational of one to believe that rights such as these should be guaranteed
…show more content…
Such examples that come to mind are the right to bear arms, abortion rights, and the death penalty. How the death penalty is executed is a different matter however; but, I digress. One criticism of the current international standard for human rights is “Non-Western concepts of human dignity are excluded from the UN declaration. This is a continuation of the epistemic racism that characterised Western colonial designs from the Rights of People to the Rights of Man and human rights - all defined from within the Western tradition of thought in exclusion, subordination and inferiorization of non-Western epistemologies.” (Farouk, 2017, pg 13) Situations involving the violation of human rights also tends only to intervened in when non-Western or Western-aligned nations are concerned. For example, Western nations turn a blind eye to the treatment of Palestinians within Israel, however political dissonants in Russia being prosecuted has led to heavy criticization by the Western community as well as heavy sanctions, although this was also due in part to other issues as well. Another prime example would be Iraq, which had a brutal military dictatorship which violated many human rights, but had a blind eye turned towards these facts as it was fighting Iran, a Western enemy. After this, when Iraq invaded Kuwait, a Western ally, Kuwait was subsequently fought for, and Iraq had its dictatorship toppled with its abuses now being acknowledged by the international
The most terrible things that infringe on human rights are genocides. These killings show complete disregard for life of a certain group. The follow strange orders, all of them, like “The outbreak of war on September 1, 1939, saw the establishment of a system of ghettos in occupied Poland from October 1939 onward, in order to confine Poland 's Jewish population. Here, they were persecuted and terrorized, starved and deprived of all medical care. (Bartrop, Paul R. "Holocaust."
Since the ancient times the research of a ‘Just’ society has always been linked with the Natural Law, a corpus of eternal, universal, and immutable rules, as the Nature, valid for everyone. The precursor of the Human Rights can be located in the Natural Rights theorized during the Renaissance humanism. Even if some rights had already been recognized, or affirmed in ancient and previous times, they were strongly connected to some divine power or religion. Nonetheless there are some precedent examples of interest. The Magna Charta signed in 1215 by that King John of England, who committed himself to respect, contained among others in its list , the rights of all free citizens to own and inherit property, to be protected from excessive taxes,
As we look throughout history, governments have implemented policies and are partially responsible for the denial of human rights to a certain group. These groups include Ukrainians and Rwandans. The denial of human rights in these regions not only affect those in the region but internationally. Both Ukrainians and Rwandans were denied their human rights. Ukraine’s hope and will was in the hands of the dictator Joseph Stalin.
On December 9, 1948, as the United States was approaching a proposal towards the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which seemed unfair and uncompromised, first lady, Eleanor Roosevelt displayed a motivational and moving speech to allow the citizens of America to come together as one to make the best of the situation that was proposed in front of them. The analysis of the tingling speech on the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, will explore the deep rhetorical devices used to compel the audience and America, including the true purpose and background of this particular eye-opening speech. In paragraph 1, it reads, “Not every man nor every government can have what he wants in a document of this kind. There are of course particular provisions in the Declaration before us with which we are not fully satisfied.”
There are a lot of enlightenment ideas like free speech, divide power and majority rules. The enlightenment idea that I am talking about contains all three of ideas. It is made by John Locke and is called as natural rights. I think the most important idea that challenges the existing authority is the natural rights. The enlightenment idea of natural rights challenged the existing authority of the king because he thinks he is the only one that has rights and no one else has it.
The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the United States are a summarization of how the United States is to be represented and the liberties it gives to all its citizens of its freedoms. Nowadays, the Government doesn’t withhold or handle its citizens as The Constitution and Declaration of Independence state it to nor do the citizens comprehend their legal rights. The Declaration of Independence states that the rights to the people is life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and that right is not to be violated. The Constitution states, all citizens have the right to bear arms. This amendment of The Constitution and rights of the people from The Declaration of Independence seem to have become the most violated and misunderstood
Everyone has different opinions or even no opinions just not acknowledging human rights. Even right now as big as human rights are people don’t agree with them or may think some are completely unreasonable and those thoughts cant be changed. As of right now human rights are a strict law but many people break them and don’t consider the fact that they are breaking the law. No matter how instructed human rights are it is not possible for them to be actualized for
Imposition on Human Rights The modern conception of civil liberties involves a long list of individual rights which include the right to liberty and security of person, rights to property and privacy, right to a fair trial and the rights to free speech. These civil and political rights are now framed as “human rights” and are protected by numerous international treaties. Freedom of movement is also broadly recognised in international law and bills of rights. Article 13 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides that everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within borders of each state.
Even Iraq was experiencing human rights abuses, as well as Vietnam when it got involved with communism. Granted, some interventions are more difficult to swallow than others, but the fact that Americans are eager and able to prevent human suffering, regardless of their secondary interests, should not be referred to as unnecessary acts of
“To deny people their human rights, is to challenge their very humanity.” -Nelson Mandela Canada is well known across the world for handling its national challenges well, yet has not been obeying the human rights. The human rights were made so everyone was equal and no one had higher power. According to Canada.ca, Canada is a founding member of the United Nation, (UN) and is a party to seven principal United Nations human rights conventions and covenants.
Correspondingly, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights depend on dignity, equality and mutual respect – regardless of your nationality, your religion or your beliefs. Your rights are tied in with being dealt with reasonably and treating others decently, and being able to make on decisions about your own life. These fundamental human rights are: Universal; They have a place with every one of us; They can't be detracted from us, Indivisible and independent Governments should not have the capacity to choose
“Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critique of International Human Rights- Friends or Foes?” The journal, “Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critique of International Human Rights- Friends or Foes?” by Oonagh Reitman have the aim to know deeper about the two critiques towards the universal Human Rights by the two major theory, which are the Cultural Relativism and Feminism, how they see the universal Human Rights theory. The Journal address for the workshop discussion matter regarding to the similarities on critique of International human rights that made by the Cultural relativist and the feminist. “ Human Rights is the right that given and held by human simply because they are human, and it does not classified nor held by certain groups or not the subject to variation in culture”(Donnelly 1989: 109-110) From the introduction in the journal, the writer defines how the feminist and the cultural relativist express their idea of Universal human rights. The idea of Universal human rights from Donnelly were being reserve by Relativist, they argue that the human rights itself root from culture and due to the variation of culture, making the human rights not universal.
“Our hopes for a more just, safe, and peaceful world can only be achieved when there is universal respect for the inherent dignity and equal rights of all members of the human family.” – UN Women Executive Director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka Throughout my life, I have never been completely decisive on a career path. However, in the last few years I have realized that my passion for human rights advocacy is my natural calling which I am destined to pursue. As I entered my first year of college at the University of Maryland – College Park, I took a specific interest in a group known as Consult Your Community. The organization allows undergraduate students to engage with low-income and minority-owned small businesses to provide pro bono consulting services.
Article 19 being the most important, makes the freedom of speech and expression, a fundamental right. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, provides, in
Human rights are founded on respect for the dignity and worth of each person. 2. Human rights are universal meaning that they are applied equally and without discrimination to all peoples. 3. Human rights are inalienable, in that no one can have his or her human rights taken away other than in specific situations.