There are times when unforeseen supervening events occur without fault of either contracting party and render performance of the contract impossible or radically different from what the parties contemplated when they enter into it. Subsequently leading the Courts to call in frustration and discharge the contract irrespective of the parties’ wishes. Due to its radical impact towards the contracting parties, the threshold of ‘impossibility’ is set very high by the Courts thus frustration of contracts is of limited practicability. The definition of ‘impossibility’ has widely been criticized unclear and uncertain as the Courts tend to interpret it extremely narrowly. In respect of justice and certainty of the rule of law, it is essential for the courts to act in this way.
Impossibility in contract law is by no means the easy definition as one would expect: ‘something which cannot be done according to the laws of nature’. It is narrowly defined by the Courts since they have to limit the application of frustration on contracts. Contracts are something valuable in the eyes of the law thus the judges are reluctant to discharge them in which discourage people from making contracts.
Due to the variability of unpredictable events that happen in life, impossibilities arise hence the doctrine of
…show more content…
Impossibility is narrowly defined to which they are physically, practically or commercially impossible. A crucial factor considered by them is the degree of impact the supervening event has on the contract. Despite often being criticized of its limited application and uncertainty, this allows flexibility in law and exercisable justice. Therefore preserve the trust and reliance people have on contracts when trading and ensure stable business operations in our
The 3 Strike Law is a law that applies to offender that have a history of being convicted of two or more violent crimes, and have moved on to committing another serious offense. Consequently, their prison sentence is increased in comparison to their previous sentences resulting in receiving a punishment to life in prison at their third offense. However, in 1994 the state of California enacted the law were criminals could be incarcerated when committing a non-violent crime for the third time, as long as they had a history of ever committing a serious or violent felony, the 3 Strike Law will still apply to them. The 3 strike Law is beneficial to society by removing the criminals off the street and preventing them from ever putting people at risk of being victimized by them again.
Memorandum To: Attorney of Jennifer Lawson From: Jackson Biegler Date: September 19, 2017 Re: Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale v. Jennifer Lawson for Breach of Contract 1) Memo Introduction a) Greene’s legal claim against Ms. Lawson is supported by a confidentiality agreement that was signed by Ms. Lawson at the very beginning of her employment at Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale. Ms. Lawson agreed not to disclose any processes that she was going to learn at Greene’s, including ever-gold, by signing the agreement.
SRT1720 Description: EC50: 0.16 μM SRT1720 is a selective activator of SIRT1. Previous in vitro and in vivo studies using various cancer cell models show the role of SIRT1 either as an oncogene or a tumour suppressor gene. The oncogenic potential of SIRT1 is exemplified by studies indicating that blockade of SIRT1, like other HDACs, triggers growth arrest and apoptosis in breast, colon and lung cancers.
The trial court held for Zapatha. Dairy mart appealed. In Zapatha v Dairy Mart, 381 Mass. 284; N.E. 2d. 1370 there are two issues at hand. 1) Does the unconscionability of an agreement depend on whether at the time of execution the contract provision at issue could result in unfair surprise and was oppressive to the allegedly disadvantaged party; and 2) Whether a merchant seeking to terminate a business agreement must act in good faith by practicing honesty in fact and observing reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in that trade.
In this well-thought, extensive piece by Matt Ridley, Free Will starts off humorously with the demonstration of free will and takes us through the factors that influence it. “Society, culture and nurture.” Ridley says, are the factors and elaborates to the full extent of life as to do we have free will or not. Defending his claim that free will can be obtained against the host of critics and their sources, he analyzes and contradicts through his extensive knowledge, strong examples, and his own host of supporting credible people to shield his claim; his rhetorical strategies strongly support and defend his claim. To support the very first claim that he steps on to about the influences of free will, Ridley says, “ Everyone’s fate is determined
The Supreme Court held that an agreement that is “so consistently unreasonable that the question of reasonableness is foreclosed”, would qualify as a per se violation of the Act. Examples of per se violations include group boycotts and concerted refusals to deal. A group boycott is "a refusal to deal or an inducement of others not to deal or to have business relations with tradesmen. " A concerted refusal to deal is "an agreement by two or more persons not to do business with other individuals, or to do business with them only on specified terms."
Unit 2: EA2 Argumentative Essay Reflection What I feel I did well on this argumentative essay was my research. I had many sources that provided me with facts and statistics and they helped me to decide what side I was on. There were many sources that I did not use but that I had read through. What I struggled with was commentary.
A man in Hollywood was arrested earlier this week for derailing an LAPD helicopter that was searching for a fleeing suspect with his drone. LAPD VERSUS DRONE HOBBYISTS Originally reported by ABC7 in LA, the drone had managed to come within 50 feet of the LAPD helicopter, which forced the police to focus their attention on finding the drone pilot--ditching their original efforts to find the suspect they were pursuing. KEEP UP-TO-DATE ON MORE DRONE NEWS HERE! Eventually the LAPD found the amateur drone operator in a Rite Aid parking lot who was arrested for interfering with a police investigation.
North Platte was still a town in the United States in World War Two. This meant they were still given ration books. North Platte and all the surrounding towns helping the canteen had limitations on sugar, coffee, gasoline, among many other items. People stopped drinking coffee, and children stopped asking for birthday cakes. Together they pooled together all of their rations to make food for the soldiers.
If I had the opportunity to share a meal with any figure from American history, I would choose Dr. Mary Edwards Walker, the only female recipient of the Congressional Medal of Honor and one of the first feminists and dress reformists. One of the reasons I admire Dr. Walker is her ability to fight through prejudice. Dr. Walker lived and worked during the Civil War. She was denied a place as a doctor for the army because of her gender. After three years of volunteer work, she was given a position as a civilian contract surgeon for the Union.
Every American citizen should serve on a jury because it allows new ideas into the verdict and it is fair to all Americans. In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 11 says, “I have always thought a man was entitled to have unpopular opinion in this country. This is the reason why I came here. I wanted the right to disagree” (28). To allow all American citizens to serve on a jury, it would allow different views and ideas from other countries to be heard.
When I out grew my Shetland pony, my mother and I decided it was time to start looking for a horse for me to continue my riding career on. We had no idea at that time, that horse would be a starving, broke to only the basics, and a recent failure of a pre-purchase veterinarian exam, due to an injury to his fetlock. When we went to meet Hank, who was eventually renamed to Juble, I knew immediately that he was the horse for me, my mom wasn’t as convinced. Much like myself, my mom has a huge heart for animals, especially the ones in harmful environments, which means after minimal begging, she agreed to purchase Juble. This began the long process of helping him put on more weight, helping his swollen fetlock heal, and gaining his trust.
A flawed jury is what makes for an unfair trial. Juries are a crucial piece of the puzzle which helps create the system we have today, one where it needs to be represented in the right way that makes the justice system an improved one. The judicial system is one where the jury needs to accurately represent the community that the accused resides in, achieving this can impact the community first hand, make it easier to protect the defendant from unfair sentencing, and promote public confidence in the justice system which is what lots of people distrust and lack in. The citizens in a community are the ones that get impacted from the actions of accused in the first hand which is why they need to be accurately shown in the jury.
What is Plea Bargaining? Plea bargaining is a common practice in the criminal justice system that results in most criminal convictions. Plea Bargaining can happen from charging a defendant to before a verdict is attained. Normally, it involves a negotiation between the prosecutor and defense attorney to arrive at a bargain, which can lead to reduced charges and a shorter sentence.
As you may know, I represent Mr. Marc Donatelli in any and all actions that he may have against XXXXXX for that entity’s efforts (or lack thereof) regarding its investigation of threats and harassment directed at Mr. Donatelli by Ms. Patience Rhoades, a known prostitute, and her cohorts. For several months, Mr. Donatelli has been harassed and threatened by friends and family of Ms. Rhoades after she turned to Mr. Donatelli for help, but left inappropriately. This began in Lewisville, Texas. My client has asked me to inform you that he has sent packets of evidence to each of the agencies depicted below.