The scramble for the African colonies was essentially like Kennedy said, “a championship chess match between the British grand master and its brash European challengers. Nationalist rivalries certainly played an important part in the drive to acquire colonial territory…” Evidently when Britain went into upper Burma in 1885 they prevented possible French invasion and the occupation of Egypt in 1882 secured Britain the Suez Canal, which gave faster passage into Asia. However, it is not certain that the outcomes of the examples happened as phrased. The undertakings in Africa cannot be stated as definitive facts rather reasonable assumptions based on facts .
Africa had gained Britain’s attention in the previous centuries which was the reason
…show more content…
However, it was also met with opposition from reluctant imperialists, and forced the Victorians to invent a reason or justification for the Empire’s growth. It was as Brantlinger stated, “The Dark Continent was thus a Victorian invention. As part of a larger discourse about empire, it was shaped by political and economic pressure and also by a psychology of blaming the victim through which Europeans projected many of their own darkest impulses onto Africans” This notion can be seen in Cecil Rhodes appendix to John Flint from 1877, where he wrote “I contend that we are the finest race in the world and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. Just fancy those parts that are at present inhabited by the most despicable specimen of human beings…Africa is still lying ready for us it is our duty to take it. ” His positive rhetoric about himself and those of his class against the negative towards the people in the either colonised or yet to be colonised areas, depicts superiority against inferiority based on race typical for the Victorians. Rhodes had acquired successful diamond fields in South Africa at the time, generating comprehension to his positive inclination to promote imperialism. Imperialism had given him profit and by furthering or even maintaining it …show more content…
This belief enabled the Victorians to expand the British empire profoundly during the course of the century, especially in Africa. The outcome of it initiated by the anti-slavery programs in Africa during the early decades. These programs led to expeditions in Africa and literature of it, hence having an entire genre in the Victorian literature about exploration of Africa, invoking a growing interest in the public. This made it easier for the British government and companies to implement imperialism on the British public who were pressured by the growing power in the other European countries. However, there were consequences as Brantlinger denotes, “The Dark Continent turned into a mirror, on one level reflecting what the Victorians wanted to see -heroic and saintly self-images- but on another, casting the ghostly shadows of guilt and
I. Document B. Document B contains quotes from Freidrich Fabri’s “Does Germany Need Colonies?” and John Ruskin’s talk at Oxford University both propose that national competition provides partial fuel into African imperialism. A. In John Ruskin’s talk, he states, “This is what England must either do or perish: she must found colonies as fast and as far as possible.”
George Washington Williams, an African American legislator, and Kande Kamara, an African colonial subject, both experienced some of the most brutal products of European Imperialism. Williams, in the late nineteenth century, toured the Belgian controlled Congo and witnessed the harsh measures King Leopold implemented to maintain absolute control and bleed the country of its resources. Kamara, on the other hand, bore witness to the end result of overzealous imperial ambitions when he was forced to fight for the allies in the trenches of WWI. These two men’s experiences, although considerably different, both shed light on Europe’s colonial philosophy of racism and ethnic superiority and its position of immense power during this period.
Everyone wanted to make their lives better. They thought by imperialising and taking control over African countries they will be able to make a civilised colony. They always underestimated Africans, believing that continent had a lower social standing than they did. “It would be wise if we Germans would learn about colonial skills from our Anglo-saxon [British] cousins and would begin in a friendly competition to strive after them.” says a German writer in Document B. The Germans viewed the British in higher “cultural appreciation.”
Martial Henry Merlin believed that Europe was entitled to occupy territories in Africa to “civilize” them. (Doc. 6) His speech was given to justify the colonization of Africa. Most Europeans in this time would agree that it was a virtue for a “fully developed race” to develop countries full of “backward peoples who are plunged
Chasity L Wireman (7178872) Dr. Michael A. Lazarus HIS 102-W1: Western Civilization II 12/17/17 How race justified the imperial conquest within the nineteenth century The 19th century was known as the peak of Imperialism. Countries within Europe grew more occupied in the “Scramble for Africa”. Other nations including Britain, Spain, France, Germany and many others raced to try and conquer Africa. The imperialism within Africa had many different effects on soon to be conquered country.
Towards the close of the nineteenth century and the start of the twentieth century, European imperialist governments in their quest to expand their territories for various reasons aggressively scrambled and invaded the African continent. Initially, the gullible African societies, most of which were decentralized, welcomed the foreigners but after realizing the stakes some mounted resistance (Johnston,43). As expected, the more sophisticated imperialist governments prevailed in most of the colonies and subdued the natives. The effects of the foreign presence were monumental, and it would take more than half a century for these colonies to free themselves from the oppressive rule and become independent governments. Until the late 1800’s,
Many of the Europeans who emigrated enjoyed being superior because they believed they were doing the right thing (Document K). With the increase of technology and development during the industrial revolution, the Europeans believed it was their duty to “assist” the Africans. In the poem, “The White Man’s Burden,” by Rudyard Kipling he writes, “Take up the White Man's burden; Send forth the best ye breed; Go bind your sons to exile; To serve your captives' need.” (Document P). This poem is proof that racism was a major selling point of African imperialism and is another example of paternalism, the idea that what they were doing was for the best of the Africans.
British and French European countries were considered the biggest winners in the “race” to size African colonies in 1914. By 1885 the only two African countries to remain independent was Ethiopia and Liberia.(Doc A) John Ruskin announced in his lecture at Oxford University February 8, 1870 that the colonist “first aim” should be “to advance the power of England by land and by sea” This influence that John had for the European countries was a great impact for imperialism in Africa . Great Britain made about 3 million dollars from exports to South Saharan Africa in 1854 and this number increased to 20 million in 1900. This change in rate of growth for exports in Great Britain was a cause for competition in Africa among the European countries with the resources Africa was providing such as copper, zinc, lead, and coal.
Great Britain and South Saharan Africa imports and exports document E shows that the African colony wasn 't the best with money instead they would trade which is the main reason the Europeans took over. Imports from Africa were less while exports rose high. Great Britain made up to three million British pounds in 1854 and twenty-one in 1900 from import and export. African slaves were additionally being used to work British owned plantations in the colonies. Over all trading was a link to natural resources.
Africans were displayed as objects for buying and selling, which robbed them from their individuality and human dignity. Davidson states that the mutual respect that was once there between Africans and white people was forever changed. Boahen, in General History of Africa VII: Africa Under Colonial Domination 1880-1935, reports that there “…still stood an attitude of cultural and racial superiority, formed in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and regularly given expression in descriptions of the African as childlike or ‘non-adult’. This latter attitude in turn gave birth to widespread belief that European domination had to last for a very long time”
The authors choice to control some of Africas colonies clearly shows a commitment to form a better Germany based on the intention of trying to eliminate Germany's financial crisis. Someone also hopeful of Africa bringing better advancements for their country was Joseph Chamberlain, a British industrialist. (doc 3) Chamberlain spoke of the situation as a hope for a better tomorrow. The British population would rise and rise again until as a nation they would begin to starve.
The first reason for what caused imperialism in Africa was cultural beliefs. In document B, John Ruskin says, "This is what [England] must either do or perish: she must found colonies as fast and as far as she is able." John Ruskin says this because he is inferring to finding other faraway colonies. John Ruskin's statement shows they have national pride and want to find other colonies.
Based on the documents, expanding empires and having a new source of materials was the driving force of imperialism in Africa. On the map in document A, it shows the partition of Africa among the European countries. Out of the eight countries that are shown the
Colonialism and Imperialism affected our world both positively and negatively. On one hand, Imperialism has often been linked with racial segregation, manipulation, and hardship. On the other, it has been said that many colonial powers contributed much in terms of schools, roads, railways, and much more. Whether this time period was constructive or harmful, it has played a large part in shaping our lives today. European Imperialism started long before the 1800’s.
Moreover, Western civilization became the ideal civilization, and became way superior to African “civilization.” As a consequence, African tradition became perceived as primitive, outmoded, and sadly not welcomed by the rest of the world. Unfortunately, a lot of Africans experienced a trend of a dying out culture. (2) It can be implied that even the Africans’ self-perception dropped because the only lifestyle they knew was suddenly taken away from them and they were taught that it was substandard. Therefore, the indigenous inhabitants of the colonies, the Africans, had to adapt to a new, “superlative” culture and view it as more sophisticated than theirs.