In Praise Of The Ordinary Child Analysis

Let me first describe how Virtue Ethics is not persuasive. Virtue Ethics demands what we should be as opposed to what we should do. (Shafer-Landau, 252) Unless the virtuous parent possesses the same disabilities as their child, he or she cannot appreciate their child’s disabilities. You may claim the child inherited the disability from the parent and so the virtuous parent does appreciate the child’s disabilities. However, this leads to the controversial claim that disabilities are hereditary.

He states that, “When you start rewarding kids with I saw that you really enjoyed this and good job on this play. Then the trophy becomes meaningless (Fader, n.d.).” When kids show bad sportsmanship and flip out on other kids, causing scenes. It embraces that child’s parents, friends, and the program affiliated with them. It’s all because they don’t know how to take disappointment or a loss (Fader, n.d.). High school departments and coaches everywhere in my area say no to the “give me” trophies.

My first reason has to deal with the attitude of the parents can tend to lead their teens to acting the same. This is because the kids see their parents as role models but sometimes when the parent goes crazy over a game there kids see that and tend to act out too. My second reason is teens only wanting to win, not many teens like losing I don 't think anyone does but the problem is that kids don 't known how take in that they loss. My last reason is kids taking their frustration out on others. Many times the kid attitude are reflected on the athlete 's parents.

Secondly, even if it was a terrible day with their children, they could do something totally heartwarming and all would be forgotten. Gilbert states, “Memories are dominated by their most powerful-and not their most typical-instances.” Lastly, children take top priority over everything. Overall, Gilbert is saying that children do not increase parent’s happiness on a daily basis, but they love them regardless, and most of the time, without reward. I agree with Gilbert that parents do not get the appreciation they deserve. “When you have one joy it’s bound to be the greatest.” This quote from Gilbert’s essay is one that had a personal

Summary In “Children Need to Play, Not Compete,” Jessica Statsky tries to demonstrate the negative effect of organized sports on the physical and psychological health of growing child. She claims that the games are not festive but they end up in the wrong development of a child’s brain. The coaches and parents have high hopes for their children that result in the pressure building. This changes the purpose of sports from teaching tolerance, teamwork and sportsmanship to merely winning by all means. The writer further explains that the idea of winning sometimes causes severe injuries that may prevail for a lifetime.

The final reason is kind of an ethical one in this day and age in order to get ahead Samuel mother says you have to be behind but he is no way is he promoting that but he is actually saying that it is belittling to redshirted children the funny is that in the past if you wanted your child to get ahead you would want them to skip a grade now in order to get ahead you want him to stay back a year this quote supports her wretched children are just being put in the easiest position to succeed because they are not given challenging opportunities to test their limits making them the best that they can be read should and should not be the way of the future I do not want to be in a future for myself what is my grade and what

Do We Give Our Children Too Many Trophies? A trophy symbolizes a win or an achievement, but does it mean anything if you get a trophy just because everyone else did? If you are awarded a trophy and you know that you have not done anything to deserve it then you might feel bad about yourself. If you know for sure that you are going to get a trophy, then why would you go to practice, lessons, or even competitions or games? If there is a limited number of trophies and rewards to be handed out then everyone will want to win and work hard so they will get that prize.

However, on the moral grounds, this becomes the most important duty for the children on the moral grounds to at least pay a little to the efforts and hardships of their parents by helping and easing them when they grow old. The objective does not seems to be persuasive because it considers the friendship bond on the basis of favors and friends are made when individuals are adults; not helpless children. When they are kids, then their parents are with them, not their friends. Sommers believe that the traditional family values are being weakened because of the underlying issues created by the philosophers who are against the traditional values. Sommers has made use of the “special duties” that are the “duties not voluntarily assumed that devolve on specific individuals, such as kinship” (Sommers, 1993).

Why would you use your energy to earn something you know you will already get? Why choose the difficult path when the lazy one leads to the same place? When everyone gets a trophy it doesn’t matter who’s best, or if you worked hard, everyone gets the same prize. Top performers should be rewarded for their talents and those that don’t get a trophy need to learn the important lesson that you are not always going to win and you need to congratulate those who do (Wallace). Participation trophies lead to laziness and they allow people to hold back on their full potential.

The bad part about being in an open adoption process is when the adopted parents feel to be a threat, fearing that the birthparents will intrude. This is a situation most people feel simply because they want the biological parents just popping in their lives. Some adopted parents don’t mind it but others do. Another problem open adopted parents have is that the biological parents might want their child returned to them. FindLaw.com said “Adoptive parent may worry that the child will be confused over who his or her “real” parents