People in the upper class are sometimes accused of spying, murder, and rebellion. The Commoners, being accused of a small crime could be a death sentence. People in the lower class are sometimes accused of theft, begging, and poaching. Throughout Elizabethan Era, the disciplines were narcotic and just plain inhumane. Crime and punishment is important because we now know how history is different from today's
Puritans had self-government. They made rules for themselves, religion effected a very large part of the government for example only male church members could vote or be part of the government. In the middle colonies, it wasn’t only dominated by one religion which gave into more liberal attitudes and religious freedom. In colonies such as New York and New Jersey which were royal colonies, the governor was chosen by the British government. In Proprietary colonies, the proprietors had the right to choose the governor.
Although the two empires shared similarities in their military tactics and expansion, they showed numerous differences in the capital and the societal structures. The Aztec civilization, which was mainly centered in Mesoamerica, was not brutal or harsh as many believed. It was rich in both heritage and rituals. Similarly, the Inca Empire, which was in the west of South America, spanned for many miles and succeeded in many professions throughout the centuries between the 13th and 16 century. The two empires shared similarities in their military tactics and expansion.
In the 1500’s The Inca civilization ended in 1532 and their civilization started around 1438. The Aztec empire however, started in 1427 and ended in 1521. they both built amazing empires that are still recognized today. They believed in gods, they invented clever inventions, and created a lifestyle for the whole empire. In conclusion, these are the similarities between the Aztec and Inca empire. All empires and tribes have things that they will have in common but they all are different from each other.
People would not be able to get away with such a cruel action towards other humans, that they might of been allowed to in the Elizabethan era times. Why in the world were punishments for crimes so cruel during the Elizabethan era? In this time period, punishments were a lot more harsh than they are now. People kill others in this time and just get sentenced to life in prison, they are still fed and have shelter. Torture then at that time was used to punish a person for his or her crimes, intimidate them and the group to which he or she belongs, gather information, and/or obtain a confession.
During the Medieval Period, the punishment one received depended on the severity of the crime. Also, more crimes were committed during this time because it was hard to find jobs at the time, the poor had hardly any choice but to steal to survive [S5]. However, people today usually get a fine for most crimes, such as speeding or stealing. Serious crimes, like murder or rape, people get sent to jail for a certain amount of time depending on the severity of the crime. The way we punish today is very different to the way people were punished in medieval times.
On the opposite end of the caste system the Shudra, who are the lower-caste, would have harsher punishments for the simplest offenses. For instance, if a Shudra was to have injured a Brahmin, then the Shudra would have the limb used to assault the Brahmin amputated off. Throughout Asian culture the Tang dynasty was another who practice crime and punishment according to status. It seems that according to Roth that an abounding number of ancient civilizations used status quote as a way to determine which group of people should have extreme punishment or only having to compensate instead of facing physical
But, executions were often decapitations. People that were scheduled for decapitations would even bribe the scheduled axeman to sharpen the blade extra so that the job would be done in one single stroke. (Franck and Brownstone 169) Prisons and executions in the Victorian era were often
Someone who lied or insulted another person had to pay a considerable fine. A man in Virginia vehemently ridiculed the governor. He had his tongue pierced, and then the authorities banished him from the neighborhood. The hostile colonists aimed for criminal punishments to mortify the offenders. Instead of placing convicts in jail, they would often be whipped publicly or have the name of the offense burned onto one of their hands.
Crime and Punishment With the Aztecs, it was a court system. They had a strict, sophisticated code of law that punished people anywhere from drunkenness to murder. They also had a system of courts, depending on different levels of crime, going all the way up to the Supreme Court. These different levels of court allowed people to appeal to a higher court if they didn’t agree to what one judge said. If a criminal was found guilty, common punishments included having your head shaved, having your home demolished, or more commonly, a death penalty.
They center their government on the family structure. As the tribe groups grow, they begin to form Calpulli, a group of family that own land together and service that land to supply the basic needs for the empire. Each Calpulli would choice a leader and those leaders would form the city of council. Although, the Calpulli held much power within the government they still had to report to the nobility and priesthood. Finally, there Huey Tlatcani better known as the Great Speaker.