Language in the modern world is diverse and in a constant state of change with the adoption of slang, abbreviations and assimilation. While the language changes, people that are accustomed to the dialect they were raised with change with it, their speech is modified then the language changes altogether. A prime example is the Mexican and Spanish language, the Spanish inhabited Mexico and over the years of separation a new language was formed that remains very similar to the Spanish language however it created a new language altogether. With that being said, forcing a new language down the throats of children, that may or may not be having a hard time with english as it is, feels pretentious.
Many countries require English to be taught as a second language in their school system the reason has to do primarily with the roots of emigration, when a citizen of another country chooses to emigrate to the United States they are assessed in multiple areas in the school system. If not for the secondary language requirement of their home country they would be more than overwhelmed and unprepared for life here
…show more content…
Forcing children to dive into a second language when they have yet to perfect the English language is irresponsible and could cause confusion and create more slang and english modification and could result in another language altogether. This is a worst case scenario, however the result remains possible and why would the United States require a secondary language for natural born citizens when this country has the largest economy in the world. The need for a secondary language requirement likely stems from a sense of guilt, that can be attributed to social movements, and we are trying to impress other cultures and prove something to other nations, I believe that today’s youth is embarrassed of the country they call
Imagine being punished for saying one word or phrase in your first language that just comes natural to you. This is another example that makes the audience question their own beliefs on the “English only”
by Robert D. King illustrates that English being the national language is just fine and there is actually no need of making
This is occurring in a school district that is located on the “wrong” (east) side of El Paso and serves a student population that is 88.1 percent Hispanic and 73.4 percent economically disadvantaged. Dual language has helped liberate its students from the grim statistical reality that half of the Hispanic students in Texas will become dropouts: Ysleta boasts a graduation rate of 84 percent, well above both the Dallas and Houston school districts. A pioneer in dual language, Del Valle in 2005 graduated the first class to begin the program in elementary school. Instead of leaving Spanish behind for all-English classes, students were taught core subjects like algebra and world history in both Spanish and English. - See more at:
Language, though primarily used as a means of communication, can be used to form community-like bonds with additions to and evolutions of different regional, cultural, racial, etc., vernaculars. What is one community’s “how are you?” is another’s “what’s good?” or “‘sup?” Those terms are understood and accepted almost unilaterally in their respective communities, but beyond those borders, they may or may not be. The push to broaden mandating “proper English pronunciation” is a direct attack on those communities that do not fall in the narrow definition of those whose community is deemed “correct” by mainstream society. When this is enforced, its roots are usually found in racism/white supremacy.
Most Americans speak one or two languages. However, with 162 languages spoken in the United States, English is often not a common language. If America were to have a national language, it could create connections that can help the nation and stop the discrimination non-English speakers. A common language that is spoken in a nation can bring different cultures and traditions together. To have English as America’s main language can increase economy.
Confident Relationships Built on Language Wouldn’t it be exciting to grow up learning more than one language? Imagine being in Japan for a week on vacation with a group of friends, and one day decided to go to the oldest zoo in Japan, Ueno Zoo. To get to Ueno Zoo, riding the bullet train was a necessity, except knowing which line was the correct line, when to get off the bullet train, or even which ticket to buy was a daunting task. Nobody in your group has the confidence to ask the workers for help since they don’t have the knowledge of Japanese to help them.
I believe this was an important step to take but more could be done in this area, especially in rural areas where there are predominantly English speaking students. Many schools don 't have the proper resources to handle students who cannot speak or understand proper
According to Jarmel and Schneider (2010), by the year 2025, one-third of students attending public schools will not know English when they start Kindergarten. How will schools adapt to this? Will teachers and/or students be limited on what they can teach/learn throughout the school year because of time restraints? In a documentary Speaking in Tongues, directed by Jarmel & Schneider (2010), four students who range from Kindergarten to eighth grade, showcase their experiences about attending public school around the San Francisco area to become bilingual. The four students Durrell, Jason, Julian, and Kelly are taught in English and also in a second language such as Mandarin, Spanish, Chinese, and Cantonese.
“No Comprendo” (“I Don’t Understand”) is a newspaper article by Barbara Mujica, a professor of Spanish at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. In this article, which was published in the New York Times, Mujica argues against bilingual education (teaching students in their native language as well as in English). No Comprendo Last spring, my niece phoned me in tears. She was graduating from high school and had to make a decision.
If a student is able to communicate well enough in his or her non-Standard English for others to understand, why should educators be concerned about non-Standard English usage? Students need to understand Standard English because it will greatly affect their future ability. If a student is not taught to use and understand Standard English, they will be less successful in school and less likely to seek a higher education. Standard English is used in all public and private schools in the U.S., which would make learning more difficult if not impossible for students who do not understand it. Students who grow-up using non-Standard English are taken less seriously and perceived to less intelligent therefore they become less successful as adults.
These children are entering school speaking little or no English at all, making it difficult for them to adjust to school. The authors explain “The U.S. teaching force is not well equipped to help these children and those who speak vernacular dialects of English adjust to school and learn joyfully.” (Fillmore & Snow, pg. 3.) I agree that it is substantial for teachers to be prepared and to continue on with ongoing training in order to be able to help students with their language development and learning. It was interesting to read that teachers
The United States is a place of freedom. We are a mixing pot that unifies as one. Many religions, cultures, and languages make their home in the Unites States. Many foreigners see the U.S. as an opportunity to seek better lives and education, but when it comes to foreigners and native-born non-English speakers that do not yet know English, it becomes a little more difficult to go about an average day let alone make a better future. Children in school often become English Language Learners, or ELL, to assimilate to the American standards.
The children learning a second language for develop skills that will help create opportunities in the future and ability to communicate with others in different situations. It will most certainly In addition to the language skills of children with learning a second language, and learning the cultural differences helps. Includes a variety of educational and career opportunities as well. However, children learning a second language in the early teens It can learn faster and learn the lesson faster also. But it does not mean if passed, then a teenager.
However, many kids learn to speak another language, beside English, at home from their parents. Sometimes, it is the primary language. The primary language could be learned before English. Foreign languages should be required at elementary schools because it helps the students become more culturally diverse, students get more opportunities and foreign language can helps students relate to other students better.
It is encouraged for students to learn foreign languages as it has numerous benefits. Most countries have introduced foreign language starting from the early age. Today, the high school graduates are required to study foreign language in schools as it becomes a requirement for them to graduate from certain college with minimum of two years of learning foreign languages. Hence, the students are encouraged to learn on other language. Basically, foreign language is a native to another country and it is also a language which is not spoken in the native country of the person referred to.