Income Inequalities In America

The inequality gap has grown consistently over the years in America making more than half of the public change their opinion about the wealthy families in U.S. People now believe that those with money need to be taxed heavily and there should be an equal re-distribution of wealth. The poor are blaming rich for their state, suggesting they ripped the poor off to become rich and not through hardwork, according to the New York times Poll and CBS News Poll that discovered “66% of Americans suggest that the wealth of the nation should be distributed more evenly and a majority of them want the rich to pay more taxes” (reich, p. 400).

Income Inequality or “wage gap” is a big topic for freedom fighters and liberals for the simple fact that it isn’t equal for everyone. Because the wage gap is so prominent it's one of the biggest “facts” that discrimination is still apart of everyday American society. The wage gap from these radical interest groups think the economy is get a dollar take a dollar instead of a free flow economy. This misguided idea of the economy is absolutely not true and isn’t at the fault of the Government, but the people.

The article “Confronting Inequality,” written by Paul Krugman, a professor at Princeton University, emphasizes that the middle class suffers from social inequality and economic inequality. Krugman suggests building a stronger safety net so the gap between the poor and rich can be limited to by raising of the taxes. Krugman uses this claim to highlight the fact that the middle class needs to be stronger and the only way to achieve that is to have a strong safety net. Krugman says the rich use loopholes in the tax system to cheat their way out of high taxes, and the poor pay a relatively high tax compared to what they should be paying. Krugman states if these ideas were incorporated into society, it would link the gap between

Paul Krugman, an economics professor at Princeton, writes “Confronting Inequality” chapter 7 in his book. Equality in America is what makes America, what it stands for. Social and economic inequality still is a part of everyday life in America. Education is making parents struggle because they want to give them a good education; but also, health care for those who need it. Middle-class starts to scramble more every day while the high-class gets more prosperous. Inequality in America is creating trouble to the lives of Americans.

Governments need to tax its citizens in order to protect and serve them. Many politicians vehemently debate which taxation methods the government should or should not utilize. Most members of the United States of America pay taxes every year. No wonder taxes play a major role in politics. According to popular belief, we procure an income tax because it provides the best way to tax citizens. Pete Sepp, communications director for the Virginian-based Taxpayers Union, says that “we feel that income taxes are among the most economically destructive as well as politically deceptive ways to raise revenue” (qtd. in Jeffs). What most Americans do not realize is that an income tax actually cripples the poor. Companies mark up prices because the businesses

Another historical case of racial discrimination was Brown v. Board of Topeka. In the Plessy v. Ferguson case the U.S. court avoided the issue of the protection that citizens were guaranteed under the 14th Amendment. Instead, they just stepped around the issue by saying that it was reasonable for the states to have such laws. Plessy Ferguson case ruled that facilities that were separate and equal were not unconstitutional, but equal. However, the Plessy v. Ferguson case helped African Americans to step in the right direction. At the time of the Plessy Ferguson case the rights of African Americans were being eliminated by laws such as Jim Crow Laws of the the South. In Brown v. Board the U. S. Supreme court

Income inequality has grown significantly during this past decades and this phenomenon continues to increase over the years. This problem is constantly discussed in the daily news all around the world. Several consequences of this increase of inequality between people leads to economic problems such as high unemployment rates, lack of work for young people, fall of demand for certain product. The gap between rich and poor is increasing, the rich are richer and the poor are poorer as a result politicians and economists try to adopt certain policies in order to reduce this gap. The United States exhibits a wide difference of wealth distribution between rich and poor people, which is larger than any other major developed country.

One interesting thing the author notes is the wealth inequality in the United States. Even though “1% of the population own nearly half the wealth in the country the American dream persists” (Golash-Boza, pg. 269). People still believe that if you work hard you will succeed. At first glance, it’s clear that white people have a higher percentage of home ownership than any other race. However in saying that, I would like to know what the population totals were by race for each state as well.

The wealthy continue to grow as they get more of everything and the lower class continue to get less. The average wealth has increased over the last 50 years, but it has not grown equally for all. “ Families near the bottom of the wealth distribution (those at the 10th percentile) went from having no wealth on average to being

Are you the "99 percent" or are you the "1 percent" ? In the United States, nationals are set in social classes based upon their salary. This motto focuses on the abundance of the wealthiest and the rest. As indicated by the article "We are the 99 percent" by Brian Shelter, protestors are battling for more equivalent dispersion of wage. They are utilizing online networking like Twitter, Skype, Tumblr, Facebook and more to Arrange occasions and advance their reason.

The problem of income inequality is not something new, but it is something that people must worry about because it is affecting not only our wallets, but our communities as a whole. I agree on the author’s point of view about income inequality in the United States his position is very similar to another Robert Reich documentary called “Inequality for all” where he mentions all the aspects that brought United States economic system to a hold just to help a fraction of all population one of those systems was education where before the nineteen eighties it was cheaper to go to college than nowadays or the fact that workers were pay almost the same as any other for their sacrifice . Going back to the video on debate he mentions how policies changed

Inequality has been around since man first started to gather in groups. Since the time of the hunter gathers into the middle ages. Today in the United States inequality is worse than it has ever been, even with the significant dip between the 1940s and the 1970s. The increase in inequality is not limited to the United States but it is happening the fastest here. We have to look at the different factors that have played a role in the increase which are: technology, the decline in manufacturing and increase in globalization, and government policy.

Throughout history Americans have experienced a decline in economic equality; the difference in earning between the rich and poor has steadily risen. This slow progression of the working class growing distant from the 1%, or those that hold the majority of wealth in America, is believed to have begun in 1973. Inegalitarians such as George Sher, a professor of philosophy at Rice University and author of “Equality for Inegalitarians”, agrees and is fighting to combat against this inequality by exploiting the truth about why he feels that the majority of Americans are not equal economically. In order to find a solution to this problem, he believes that we should be focused as a nation on opportunity, not equality. He believes that “that the

Many people are strongly debating whether or not the rich should pay higher taxes. I believe it should be that the rich do pay higher taxes. When times in the economy are rough, the government needs to look consider at how they could bring in more money. Charging the wealthy higher taxes could be a strategy the government could use., and the wealthy people are the ones who could afford it. But, taxing the rich more also wouldn’t be impartial that fair because the government already wastes much of the money pay they collect. Even though the wealthy have a higher income and can afford it, most of the wealthy worked hard to get where they are now. If we make the Making the rich pay higher taxes will have advantages and disadvantages as well.

Do you ever think of why should or shouldn’t the rich people pay more tax than others? Nowadays, people are arguing about the fairness of paying more tax. Statistics have proven that the rich have paid the majority of U.S. income taxes. A person making $100,000 will pay a higher percentage of his income in taxes than a person making $20,000 for instance. According to the Congressional Budget Office, “The 10% of households with the highest incomes pay more than half of all federal taxes. They pay more than 70% of federal income taxes.” On one hand, some experts think rich shouldn’t be taxed more because somehow the money was earned. Rich people worked hard to earn it, and their work should be valued. On the other hand, most people think that rich should pay more tax because they get more from the government. Is it ethical and rational to tax more on rich? Why must the rich pay more tax to help the poor? Although taxing more on rich seems unfair for the rich, it is necessary that rich people should pay more tax and the amount they pay are based on their incomes.