India has a rapid growing economy and a developing social, and they will soon become an economic powerhouse in the world. However, China is one of the most socially and economically advanced countries in the world. India lack multiple components that set them beneath China and the rest of the world. China leads them in all three of the statistics that follow: Poverty, GDP growth, and gender equality. Throughout history China has been more successful than India and it will remain this way, until India changes their ways.
Firstly, poverty is one of the largest issues both of these countries face. The Indian government has tried to help their people, but have not been as successful as China in doing so. For example, over the past thirty years China has created over 800 million jobs in its, helping their people and getting them off of the streets. Most of these jobs are working in factories, and as a result they are receiving money to support themselves and their families. In contrast, to China’s success, India has failed to imitate this, and have sent nearly one fourth of their population into extreme poverty. This is nearly 450 million people living without or barely any
…show more content…
They are currently better off economically, they are equal to both and all genders, and they helped hundreds of millions of people with poverty. As for the future, China’s economy has shown signs of slowing down, and they do not have much space for factories anymore, my hypothesis is that China will become similar to Japan in the 90’s. China has had a couple of decades of economic and social success, but they will soon flat line and perhaps even decline a bit. If India solve their problems then they will be able to surpass China one day, and will compete against the United States for one of the most powerful economies in the world. For the moment China is more successful right now, and throughout the rest of
I 1. Compare and contrast the ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt. Point out the similarities and the differences in geography, religion, social structure, political systems, economy, status of women, and other factors, and explain the effect of these differences and similarities upon each civilization. The similarities between Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia as far as geography is both civilizations depended on a drainage system for their existence.
However, humans have achieved a level that was never previously before known. Some countries have been able to reduce a high population without the One Child Policy (Doc B). However, even though these countries have been able to drop their population, these countries still have an extremely high poverty rate. In China the amount of people in poverty is 13.1%. Even though this is a high poverty rate the poverty line in South Korea is 15% (World Bank).
Mao Zedong, one of the most influential leaders in Chinese history, once said that, “Of all the things in the world, people are the most precious.” One of the biggest problems that he faced was the growing population of China. At first, he discouraged birth control, but when the growth rate was growing astronomically, Mao introduced “Late, Long and Few.” When even this was not slowing down the population growth, China implemented a one-child policy. It allowed for the Chinese population to have one child, and was far more harmful than beneficial to China.
There where many factors that led China to political unification in contrast to India. One factor is, dynasties such as the Zhou Dynasty who kept the same political system as its predecessors, where India had changed many things and continued to change political and social systems. India was very fragmented in political unification because, India was and still is a land of diversity. Ancient India was also not as organized as Ancient China in ruling. When the Zhou kingdom had started to end and break apart into many powerful states a “relativity young state of Qin located in the original homeland of the Zhou, emerged as a key player in conflicts”(p.
As China grew with population and technologies, so did their government. Their military was weak but they had the idea to make iron and steel weaponry. The increase of weapons allowed the Chinese military to have more power over the people. Yet, the downfall of their era was their tactics in controlling their army and the rebellious citizens. As China’s economy and population grows, so does the growth of politics and Urban life styles.
Australia and China are two very different countries with an almost polar opposite government structure, political systems and values. Australia is a constitutional monarchy whereas China is a single communist party state. It is arguable as to which system of government is more effective, considering it is involves other factors like social freedom, the quality of life and the economy. But comparing hand in hand, Australia’s system of government has proven to be more effective in all of these areas. Australia and China have many similarities yet differ greatly in political structure.
D). The observed life expectancy for the U.S in 2016 was 76.5 and 81.2 for males and females, respectively, and their infant mortality rate in 2016 was at a very low 5.8 deaths per 1000 births (UNDP, 2016). In contrast, India has a population size much closer to that of China, at 1.3 billion people, and has a GNI per capita of 1,670 dollars (World Bank, n.d. C). Although India is of a lower economical rank, China and India are much closer together in economic status than compared to the extremely high GNI per capita of the US.
China on the other hand had more problems in its bureaucracy and civic unrest. For example, some peasants who had lost their farms had to sell their children into service. A third difference is that as previously stated, China had a successful revival while Rome did not. Rome divided and the Western half survived but was diminished by attempts to regulate the economy and decline tax revenue ’s.
Most people who like trucks admire them for the way they look or how they run on the road and other things trucks have. There are a variety of types of trucks such as Ford, Chevy, Nissan, Toyota, Dodges (Rams), GMC and maybe Hondas. There is people who talk about which truck is better by comparing them together and arguing about them. But we are going to compare Ford and Chevy. To start where and how did Ford brand begin?
Similar to the Byzantine Empire, China was very successful before Islam. The main difference was that China remained successful all throughout the spread of Islam while the Byzantine Empire
Both Han China and Classical India used social structure systems as a method of political control. The caste or class a person was born into in either China or India, determined your position and status, unless under extreme circumstances would a person be lowered or raised in a caste or class. However, how people were placed into a specific social structure were very different. Han China developed a social structure based upon literacy, and Classical India introduced a caste system based on “occupation”.
For instance, them two had sorted out governments yet Egypt 's was a Theocracy and China 's was a Monarchy. Social pecking order varied between the two, too. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was the sun and stars over the entire of Egypt, he was accepted to be a resurrection of God. In china be that as it may, home and family were at the focal point of life. The two both assembled incredible structures, yet the Egyptians made Pyramids while the Chinese constructed the Great Wall of China.
Chinese tradition is opposed to individual glorification and considers anyone who desires personal enhancement as a threat to collectivism (Pye, 1982). Chinese are more group-oriented, they value respect and friendship. China is more Egalitarian, meaning that they share power and share authority and spread the authority out evenly. They do not expect all power as some cultures do. Next is Performance orientation, which means when the community encourages and rewards good things done and completed.
The Elephant and the Dragon by Robyn Meredith highlights China’s and India’s industrial growth and worldwide. Meredith describes China’s and India’s history and how both countries went from being poor to worldwide powers. Meredith shows how each of the country’s leaders influenced the fall of the economy and how future leaders led to the rise of economic growth. In each economy Meredith states that the leaders of both countries found themselves with no choice but to change and she describes the inspiration that both countries deprived their ideas from with lead to great change for the government and the people.
Never the less, it’s ironic how in the 21st century we prize ourself for being progressive when almost half of us - over 3 billion people - can’t even conjure up what life is like beyond ‘the poverty trap’ they are in. We prize ourselves, when one out of every two children is poor. Can you imagine growing up as one of the 640 million kids whom have no adequate shelter, let alone a place to call home? Or the 400 million to whom safe drinking water is simply a figment of their imagination? Or maybe the 270 million who have no means of getting health care?