In history, there are conflicts and compromises. These are shown in many ways. Whether examining treaties, battles, or even speeches, there are many examples throughout time of groups having said conflicts and compromises. In this research paper, the writer will be concentrating on a certain area of history, Indian-U.S. relations. Prior to 1851 there had been many wars between the Americans and the Indians. This includes: The Revolutionary War, the Northwest Indian War, the Second Seminole War, and the Indian war of Removal. These conflicts leads to the best solution to Indian-American relations, the Indian Appropriation Acts. The Indian Appropriation Acts of 1871 and 1851 were the best solution between the US and the native Americans because, …show more content…
and the indians. But after the acts it lowered this tremendously. The first reason why the Indian Appropriation Acts lowered turmoil, is because it stopped land disputes. Speaking on the Acts, Elizabeth Pauls says, ”These treaties, which took much time and effort to finalize, ceased with the passage of the 1871 Indian Appropriation Act, declaring that “no Indian nation or tribe” would be recognized “as an independent nation, tribe, or power with whom the United States may contract by treaty.” Because the Indians were no longer recognized as sovereign states, they were then designated to move to reservations. As the Indians now had land to live on, and didn’t have to worry about maintaining the land as much.
The way the Indians were able to have land was because they lived on reservations. Reservations, were controversial, but they did give pretty stable land to the Indians. On the topic of reservations, Bennett Elmer said, “The 1851 Indian Appropriation Acts allocated funds to move Western tribes onto reservations.” The U.S. government attempted to settle this by spending money and buying land for them to live on. This resulted in some land losses from the native Americans, but then they were guaranteed land to live
…show more content…
Since the tribes were inducted to the U.S., it designated them for military support from the federal government. Not only did they get military support, they were allowed to join the military if they want to. The Native Americans Right Fund expands onto the point by saying,”The federal government has a trust responsibility to protect tribal lands, assets, resources and treaty rights.” Protecting these assets keeps foreign nations, or at the time, other tribes from taking or attacking the native
Issue Whether the land title transferred from the Indian tribes to private individuals prior to the American Revolution is recognized in a United States court? Facts Joshua Johnson (plaintiff) inherited a tract of land from his father, who bought the land from the Piankeshaw Indians prior to the American Revolution at which time the Piankeshaw Indians lived on the land. The county of Illinois in which the land was located was created by the State of Virginia after the Declaration of Independence. The land was then conveyed to the United States government by the Virginia delegates to Congress.
During the late 1800’s the US government attempted to bring peace back to the west by reducing territorial conflict between Indian tribes and western settlers. Indian tribes were to be given land and promised goods to keep conflict at a minimum; however, pressure from the settlers and failure to provide the promised goods sparked conflicts. Sarah Winnemucca Hopkins and the people of her tribe were some of those affected by the reservation policy’s failures. Sarah Winnemucca Hopkins did have a claim to demand her tibe’s land back because of her background, reservation laws in place, and reperations for how badly her tribe was treated. Sarah had a claim to demand the tribe’s land back simply due to her background.
Here and there has been problems popping from past or present, but one problem from the past called the Indian Removal act of 1830, it took most of Georgia’s residents to take care of this case, where a huge debate happened if the Cherokee’s are allowed to stay in the Northern part of Georgia or not stay or get forced out of Georgia. The indian removal act caused a lot of problems with the Indians, specifically the Cherokees and the Americans. The cherokees lived in the northern part of Georgia while the purpose of the Americans was to expand and gain more land, but the Cherokees doesn’t want to move due to the northern of Georgia was their own land, and they have developed many agricultural, industry, and their own government.
Suddenly, the United States had authority over the Native American tribes and how to deal with them economically and
This essay considers The Last Indian Wars between 1860 and 1890. Since the arrival of first European settlers in 15th century, violent conflict between the white settlers and the Amerindians resulted in battles or massacres such as King Phillip’s War (1676) and Wounded Knee Massacre (1890). American society consistently displaced Amerindians further west in the frontier. The frontier, in turn, marked the border for American civilization. Manifest Destiny and anti-Amerindian sentiments heavily influenced the federal government’s campaign against Amerindians.
More indians tribes were destroyed during war with the whites, and since the Native Americans did not have as much technology, food, and medicine as the whites, they lost a lot of warriors. Many Native Americans would leave their tribes in search for food only to be confronted and ambushed by white soldiers. Some Native Americans chose to surrender rather than to be moved to a different location. After the Indian and American War, the General Allotment Act was passed, also known as The Dawes Act of 1887. The Dawes Act granted Native Americans land allotments.
The Indians did establish schools, develop written language and laws and even became sedentary farmers. Even though they had done all this to become a citizen they were still not recognized. They gave up hunting to adapt the European-American culture. The policy was designed to remove the Native Americans by the American government. The Indian Removal Act was not just created in the 1830’s but was culminated in the nineteenth century.
According to the article, “Move the Cherokee to Indian Territory”, it says, “ It is estimated that there are no more than 50,000 Indians in the southwest, which represents more than one square mile per person”. That is a lot of land for the Indians. Technically, each person could get one square mile of land for themselves. Also, the same article states that, “Not only were they given the land in Indian Territory for free, but they were also given $5 million.” The Americans were offering so much for the Indians, but none of them were grateful enough to accept it.
Lilly Fuller-Delmont 1/17/18 S.S8 DBQ Essay Per.3 In the mid 18th century settlers moved to the west. Their move brought them more opportunities and a better lifestyle on the frontier. Such as the transcontinental Railroad.
With the Expansion of the American people towards the West,many settlers faced challenges such as clashes with Native American people who have lived in the plans they are now claiming for centuries. How many battles were faced between the Native Americans and the United States government which came to be known as the Indian Wars. one of the many chiefs alive during the Indian Wars wrote the textual essay above this short speech was given by Chief Joseph on the day of his surrender in October 5th 1877.Chief Joseph surrendered on the day of October 5th 1877 after many days of pursuit alongside his people. The speech he gave was for General Howard where he asked for a favor. Chief Joseph asked for the ability to search for his people who had
When the Europeans began colonizing the New World, they had a problematic relationship with the Native Americans. The Europeans sought to control a land that the Natives inhabited all their lives. They came and decided to take whatever they wanted regardless of how it affected the Native Americans. They legislated several laws, such as the Indian Removal Act, to establish their authority. The Indian Removal Act had a negative impact on the Native Americans because they were driven away from their ancestral homes, forced to adopt a different lifestyle, and their journey westwards caused the deaths of many Native Americans.
Indians had lived in the same areas for many years and had become much more accustomed to being civilized and had even started schools, making laws and becoming farmers. But all of that didn’t matter, there was increasing pressure to open up the area the Indians inhabited so the white men could settle there. The Indian Removal Act stated that all Indians must move to lands west of the Mississippi River, Jackson said the Indians would receive money for the land they lost and that all expenses would be paid for. The act was supposed to be voluntary but they were pressured to go and the tribes that did not go peacefully were forced. While most tribes did go peacefully the Cherokee Indians wanted to fight the Removal Act and took it to the Supreme
President Jackson and Congress disagreed on the Indian Removal Policy, but Jackson went forward with it anyway. The Indians had fought with the people since the original colonization, and the U.S citizens were usually the aggrovators. The U.S had only had a couple of good relationship years, the rest of the time, there was a large amount of tension and small “wars” between the people and Natives. The U.S and Natives had been under tension for multiple years when Jackson declared the Indian Removal policy. The authors perspective towards the Indian Removal Act and Trail of Tears helped to shape our current understanding by showing how different people can have different views on a topic.
The Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 ended the allocation of lands to individual Native Americans, encouraged them to preserve their culture, and to develop their own governments. It allowed tribes become sovereign nations. This act created a cultural resurgence but halted economic progress for the tribes. The political structure of the tribes were also unstable and
First of all, Native Americans were settled on a hotbed of natural resources which included oil and precious metals such as silver and gold. There was also much fertile land that would entice farmers and frontiersmen to move out west. On this land there was so much potential economic opportunity for farmers, cattle drivers, miners and many other occupations. The government developed the popular public misconception that the indians were misusing the land and that Americans had the right to take advantage of the opportunities that lie in the west. These ideas led to the Dawes Severalty Act of 1887 which authorized encroachment of Indian lands by the US government in order to divide up reservations and control Indian activity.