Indian Forest Act 1927 Analysis

THE JURISPRUDENTIAL ANALYSIS OF THE INDIAN FOREST ACT, 1927
I. INTRODUCTION
The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (henceforth IFA, 1927) is an act which was made to protect India’s forest cover and limit the development which ensued thereafter. Keeping in mind the present depletion of forest cover in India and the lack of proper mechanism to control it, not to mention the steady pace of industrial development we Indians have been setting for the past so many years, it would not be wrong to assert that the British were undoubtedly quite progressive thinking, because they predicted our present situation years ago. Not to mention the fact that the British themselves were responsible for the most part of the harm.
The IFA, 1927 is applicable in the entire

The way our lives are progressing at this very fast pace and the technology is improving by leaps and bounds, we are leaving our environment behind. The Act can indeed be classified in the category of natural law, because it is helping us achieve the objective of nature, which is the natural way of living of a human being. If there is any law which contradicts this natural law, it would be taken to be null and void. The provisions of this act would also be constant, because all humans have conscientiously agreed to the fact that we need to preserve our biosphere, our environment, because that is the basis of our life on earth.
Like Aristotle has already said, our lives go about the natural way. They progress the natural way. It would not be improper to assume that the human beings have predestined ends. Natural law, in one way, is helping us to meet those ends. And that is the entire objective of natural law. We are supposed to end up the natural way, i.e. the primitive hunting gathering society. That is the natural end of our civilisations, to end up where we started. The IFA, 1927 helps us realise just that objective of our

He was of the opinion that any country has its own history which it can be reckoned with, and that history forms a very important part of the country’s demographics. Any contemporary law which is not in consonance with the history of the place is bound to fail. The main reason is that one cannot dissociate himself with their history, no matter how much we try to act otherwise. Historical research is the key to understanding the present in a better and a more fruitful way. That is the only way to make a fruitful legislation in return. Historical research is the prerogative of the maker of the legislation, but obviously the legislation would be better if it were built on the edifice on which it was originally meant to be. Savigny also talks about Volksgeist, which is the spirit of the people who evolve a particular piece of legislation. The principles of Volksgeist are embedded in the customary laws of the land, hence making Volksgeist a valid basis for the evolvement of a new piece of