Why Some Sports Teams May Have to Change Their Name Have you ever been offended by a name that someone has called you? More likely than not, the answer to this question is yes. This is the stand that some Indian tribes and the government are taking on the use of Indian names and mascots in sports. This controversial topic has been discussed and argued over for at least the last decade, if not longer. People are starting to wonder if using these kinds of names are appropriate or offensive to the tribe the team is named after. The debate raises this question: should Indian names and mascots be allowed in sports? In the article “Indian Mascots—You’re Out” by Jack Shakely (2011), the author tries to convince his audience that the use of …show more content…
To counter Miller’s argument, Shakely shows the other side of the issue by saying that the usage of Indian names is morally wrong. To have experienced so much personally he conveys his opinion in a way that isn’t his own experience. Shakely (2011) says, “In 21st century America, to name a sports team after an African American, Asian, or any other ethnic group is unthinkable. So why are Native Americans still fair game?” (p. 2) As seen in this quote, the author brings up other ethnic groups to get another perspective on the issue to show why these names are so ethically …show more content…
In the article written by John J. Miller, the writer didn’t make a strong connection to the audience and didn’t impact the audience emotionally either because of the lack of personal examples. However, the word choice was good and he conveyed his message to his audience in a way that I felt made them think about their own values on this subject. This is evident when Miller (2001) says, “It should matter, however, that Indians themselves don’t uniformly believe that ‘these references… are disrespectful and offensive,’ as the commission’s proposed statement asserts” (p. 2) In this quotation, he is making the readers think about the other side of the argument that often isn’t considered. On the other hand, in article written by Jack Shakely, I sensed that the author was really connecting well to the audience and showing his own values to help his audience think about and realize what their own values are. His word choice was fantastic as well which helped him make a great emotional impact on his audience through his language. While still connecting to his audience, Shakely represented his own views well. Evidence of this is shown when Shakely (2011) says, “The Times’ editorial writer, however, while noting that the solons probably had better things to do,
These teams were created and funded in many ways, because of the Jim crow Laws that prevented any other color other than whites to play on a college or pro level. African Americans
Is using Native Americans as mascots for sports teams offensive? It does not matter if it is a high school or a college, sometimes even the NFL. Examples of sports teams that use Native Americans images are Washington Redskins, Florida State Seminoles, and a high school Cherokee Braves. It is not offending and there should not be any problem because it is not making fun of anybody. Using Native American images and names in professional, collegiate, and high schools sport teams does not reinforce and perpetuate stereotypes because it symbolizes their culture, shows that they are ready to play, and appreciates their coexistence.
The Fighting Sioux Name Change The University of North Dakota, found themselves in a battle against the Standing Rock and Spirit Tribes a few years back. The Standing Rock and Spirit Tribes found the term “Fighting Sioux” and the Indian head logo disrespectful and, in fact; racist toward their heritage. After Brittany Bergstrom, the author of The Fighting Sioux: The End of a Legacy? spoke with some of the students from University of North Dakota she starts to notice that changing the name is just as offensive to them as the name itself is to the Standing Rock and Spirit Tribes. “When the ‘Fighting Sioux’ lawsuit came about, I had really never thought one way or the other about the name… I became very defensive over the name.
Native American Mascots in Sports Native American mascots have been around in professional sports since the early 1900s. That is over 100 years! Professional sports teams should keep their Native American mascots because it is a national tradition, and an it honor for the Native Americans and they are mostly not offended. First of all, most Native Americans aren’t offended by the mascot names. High schools across the country have the “offensive” names with portions of their school being Native Americans.
Making a person a mascot is rude and takes away their human aspect, they seem just like something that is watched in amusement not a person who cares about what they are called. Using terms like ‘Indians’ and having the mascot in the typical head dress with feathers is extremely stereotypical when most Native Americans today wear normal clothing and are like anybody else. The president of the NCAI (National Congress of American Indians spoke on this topic. “The invisibility of Native peoples and lack of positive images of Native cultures may not register as a problem for many Americans, but it poses a significant challenge for Native youth who want to maintain a foundation in their culture and language. The Washington team’s brand — a name derived from historical terms for hunting native peoples — is a central component to this challenge" (NCAI President Brian Cladoosby).
There are many factors that effect Native Americans such as treaty rights, health, education, and economic issues, a number of studies done by various government agencies, including the Department of Justice, have shown extremely troubling rates of violent crime inflicted on American Indian peoples, most by non-Natives, as well as a suicide incidence among American Indian children and young adults that is several times that of other ethnic groups or the general population. However, Native Americans representation through mascots and logos is an issue that effects the Native people in a more personal way. Native Americans sport team logos, mascots and nicknames are representing Native Americans in a disrespectful way which is effecting the way we perceive
Another claim opponents may believe is that the chants and mascots do not truly represent the Native Americans. As quoted in the article written by sports reporter Erik Brady, Kevin Gover, director of the National Museum of the American Indian adds, “They never honor the Native American truth. They are honoring their own notion of heritage, their own non-Indian version of history,” (qtd. In Brady). Although the argument to remove these names is compelling, the majority of people conclude that all team names, mascots, and logos involving any relation to the Native American culture, should remain as they are.
Recently, the use of controversial words has become a heavily debated topic and has gained international attention as seemingly truthful statements to some, cause insult to others. The Times article "Why 'Redskins' Is a Bad Word", by acclaimed linguist and professor John McWhortor, was published around the time the use of the word Redskin was being debated. In the article, McWhortor aims to clarify the condemnation of the word Redskin, by suggesting that the offence does not stem from the literal definition of such words, but instead the negative and often derogatory connotations the words have. McWhorter begins by introducing the recent discussions surrounding the use of the word Redskins, especially the actions taken by Californian schools
The Indian mascot was originally designed to render tribute to Native Americans, not as a racial symbol. In the past forty years, changing the name backfired, and citizens began taking offense to the name because they felt like the name represented the color of Native American’s skin. Nevertheless, many fans, including Native Americans, do not consider the name or the mascot to be degrading or racial. Fans of the Washington Redskins participated in a poll that reveals, “77 percent reject changing the name” while in another poll “71 percent of NFL fans did not find the Redskins name offensive” (Lingebach 2). Clearly, from the results of the two polls, many fans would be unhappy if the Redskins’ name were to be changed.
There are many sports team names and mascots whose names reference Native Americans; this has become a public controversy due to the sports team names being interpreted as a racially offensive pursue. Most people do not take into consideration that these teams have an important meaning behind them, and how they contribute to the insightful history of Native Americans themselves. It would be a catastrophe having to lose all the history. Many claims toward this idea of "racism" are due to NFL and college team names such as the Washington Redskins, Kansas City Chiefs, and the Florida State Seminoles are just a few.
Pocahontas Assignment 1. Why does Pewewardy believe that misrepresentation of American Indians in films can be harmful to this community? Pewewardy stresses the damaging effects that stereotypes Native Americans face in films pose to the children of Native American communities. These children see themselves as less than human not only thanks to films, but also because of the image of the Native American being used as mascots and logos.
I noticed the tremendous amount of discussion being faced about the controversy of the Cleveland Indians mascot, Chief Wahoo. Is this entire thing a racial slur or just a way to honor our Native Americans? Even though some might think that it is an honor to the Native Americans that Chief Wahoo is the mascot, but there is a whole other side of the argument. I believe the Cleveland Indians should ban their mascot.
Writing can change the way people see things. Words have the power to make something horrible seem good, or make an event in history seem very different than how it may have actually gone down. Throughout history, people have used words to empower and destroy people, to showcase something dark in a good light, or to show the darkness of a seemingly good event. One example of this is Andrew Jackson’s, On Indian Removal speech, and Michael Rutledge’s Samuel’s Memory.
We have since adopted the phrase “Native American,” as a more appropriate (and yet still all encompassing) term. However, another antiquated expression has recently gathered a lot of media attention. The National League Football team for the Washington D.C. Metropolitan area plays under the name “The Washington Redskins.”
“It’s just a time to get people thinking about putting an end to outward hatred and using sports as a tool to focus on racism,” Marshall McKay, chairman of the Yocha Dehe Wintun tribal council, told the Washington Post. There have been many more teams in the history of sports that have used team names that were offensive to native Americans. Most of those teams however keep their names because they don’t want to change the name Racism in sports is because of the racist term in the team names all around the United States. People have problems with this and some people don’t mind it.