Indian Patent Laws on pharmaceutical products:
History:
India’s first patent law was passed in 1856 during British colonial rule however the patentability of pharmaceutical products was provided by 1911 Act .During the absence of patent laws , the Indian pharmaceutical industry grew at remarkable pace but patents laws inherited from Great Britain restricted the manufacturing and industry remained stagnant till 1940’s. There was a growing consensus just after independence in 1947 that to boost manufacturing restrictive patents must be temporarily removed. Amendments were made in 1970 to the Indian Patents Act abolished product patents but retained process patents with a reduced span of protection. For this, the government of India appointed
…show more content…
Developing countries rebelled against strict imposition of this stand from developed countries as they sought compromise whereby the Article 27:1 states as follows:
“Subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3, patents shall be available for any inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve an inventive step and are capable of industrial application. Subject to paragraph 4 of Article 65, paragraph 8 of Article 70 and paragraph 3 of this Article, patents shall be available and patent rights enjoyable without discrimination as to the place of invention, the field of technology and whether products are imported or locally produced” Amendments in the Act and
…show more content…
Further clarifications have been made in obtaining compulsory licence to facilitate export of patented pharmaceutical products by Indian companies to countries that do not have adequate production capacities. TRIPS gave this instrument of compulsory licensing to governments so that they can allow domestic manufacturers to manufacture patented products within 3 years of their introduction. This would open an opportunity for manufacturers to export the medicines to other countries which are not in manufacturing of drugs. India has the opportunity to emerge as world leader in the field of export of drugs as India is rich in cost effective and intellectually competitive manpower and other resources.
Pharmaceutical substance:
The amendment currently describes Pharmaceutical substance as any new entity involving one or more inventive steps.
As it stands, the provision is too broad as it allows all types of pharmaceutical substances. The term chemical ought to have been inserted so as to read any new chemical entity.
Immunity for generic production:
This act enables the manufacturers (Generic drugs) to continue production of generic version of new drugs. For doing so, the generic companies are required to pay the patent holder a reasonable royalty. With respect to the reasonable royalty it creates the problem of excessive demands from the patent holder and litigation. The reasonable royalty rate should have
The second segment forbids any drug or food that has been contaminated or mislabeled. The third section allows the federal government’s permission to create consistent rules and regulations for the Food and Drug Act. Section four states when the substance would be tested. Next, fifth portion selects the attorney general to take into account and punish any organization that does not follow the rules and regulations. Division six identifies what will be considered as a drug.
Introduction This case study of Vehar v. Cole National Group is a case where the plaintiff, Wendy Vehar, accused Cole National Group of sex discrimination claiming that as a female she was not being the same wage as a male for performing the same duties. Additionally this study will determine if the plaintiff established a valid prima facie as well as if there was a basis for equal work. Next, what factors did the appeals court base its decision and why is the other-than-sex factor that is presented by the employer insufficient to avoid a trial? Finally, what should the employer have done differently to ensure this type of situation did not occur in their business?
The Orphan Drug Act of 1983 was signed for the main purpose of promoting the research, treatment, prevention and diagnosis of rare disease or condition. Here the products which are used in rare disease can be drugs, biologics and medical devices. A rare disease means any disease which affects less than 200,000 persons in the United States or one in which the manufacturer has no expectation of recovering the money from development and sales in the United States. According to this act, there are certain incentives will be provided to the manufacturers who will develop orphan drug for the rare disease and condition. Thus, this act can encourage the treatment for rare disease.
Back in June, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of an Asian-American rock band named “The Slants” and stated the federal government cannot ban trademarks, on the grounds that it offends, to do so violates the first amendment right to freedom of speech. While the rock band was trying to trademark their name as an act of “re-appropriation,” an attempt to reclaim a slur used against their community, the outcome of the court ruling has opened a door for those who would use this ruling for less principled causes. The disparagement clause in the 1946 Lanham Trademark Act prohibited the registration of any mark that officials consider disparaging or offensive to people, institutions, beliefs, etc. Now that the clause is deemed unconstitutional for
A new oral pharmaceutical drug for type- two diabetes had been approved for clinical use, it was called Compound 17392. Marketing companies instantly wanted to have prescribers adopt and sell the product and researchers wanted to further investigate previous reports of liver toxicity in patients. Now since paying patients to try new pharmaceutical drugs was an issue due to it appearing to interfere with clinical judgement and upholding the duty to do what is best for the patient, a new idea of furthering research for the drug came into play. The idea included recruiting a group of physicians who were in the top ten percent of prescribers for type-two diabetes. Following regulations put in place by researchers, these physicians were to enter eligible patients into the trial for Compound
Issue Whether the land title conveyed from the Indian tribes to private persons prior to the American Revolution is accepted in a United States court? Facts Joshua Johnson (plaintiff) inherited a tract of land from his father, who bought the land from the Piankeshaw Indians prior to the American Revolution at which time the Piankeshaw Indians lived on the land. The county of Illinois in which the land was located was created by the State of Virginia after the Declaration of Independence. The land was then conveyed to the United States government by the Virginia delegates to Congress.
He believes that the possession and cultivation is one step away from entering the market and without this legislation the regulation and control of interstate commerce could be
The distinctive Revolutions led to an economic revival among its manufactures and solidity. A. “Industrialized countries required a steady supply of raw materials from less developed lands” (Littell 299). B. “Industrialized countries viewed poor countries as markets for their manufactured products” (Littell 299) IV. An imposing quantity of political prospects followed from the Revolutions that established rising opportunities as a community.
In 1970, Congress enacted the Controlled Substances Act in an effort to categorize regulated drugs based on their potential for abuse. This act divided their potential into five categories or technically five schedules. Some examples from each category would be: Schedule 1: heroin or LSD Schedule 2: morphine or opium Schedule 3: butabarbital or anabolic steroids Schedule 4: chloral hydrate or diazepam Schedule 5: low-strength codeine combined with other drugs to form a cough suppressant I believe they created this act to try to prevent drug abuse. This act helps prevent drug abuse by categorizing the drugs from the highest potential of addiction to the lowest potential of addiction. The higher ones have many regulations and laws that way
“It is clear that the political and economic freedom, in England was one of the causes of her industrial expansion”(doc 9). According to this statement people had the freedom to try new things and try to invent new things. People were able to take loans to fund experiments or have entrepreneurs pay them to invent something new. It was useful for people to try new things to make work more efficient. “When one realizes the thousands of internal tariffs that obstructed traffic in Germany up to 1834 and the innumerable tolls and charges that hindered trade in France before 1789” (doc 9).
This act was enacted to clarify and define what constituted “monopolistic” activities. It protected the activities of labor unions and prohibited directors from serving in boards of competing
The 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act prevented the manufacture, sale, or transportation of misbranded or poisonous foods, drugs, medicines and liquors, and regulated the trafficking of such items. This act was ruled by the Senate and House of Representatives in Congress, and is regulated today by the U.S. Foods and Drugs Administration today. This act was very successful in improving public health, for according to the Social Security bureau of the United States, now manufactured new drugs have to be inspected and certified by appropriate personnel. This allowed for the revision of many drugs and foods, and got rid of many drugs that used strange and unusual ingredients. This included the banning of cocaine cough drops and soothing syrups that contained
Issue 6- Does the Act violate the Procedural Due Process? Conclusion 1.
It was originally concerned with ensuring products were labeled correctly, however, later on efforts were made to outlaw any products what were not safe as well as not effective. The act required that drugs such as alcohol, cocaine, heroin, morphine and cannabis were to be accurately labeled with substances and dosage. The Pure Food and Drug Act was responsible for testing all foods and drugs intended for human consumption, made it a requirement for prescriptions to be signed from a licensed physician before a patient could purchase certain drugs, and made it a requirement of label warnings on habit forming
With more drugs going off - patent, growth opportunities for the industry are expected to increase dramatically as generic