ipl-logo

Indian Removal Act Dbq

406 Words2 Pages

The Indian Removal Act helped United States expansion, and supported the unification of the nation. This opportunity for the Natives to expand their territory and prosper as a people, was beneficial for them, as well as for Americans past, present and future. We’d had past treaties with the Natives, but because of infractions on both sides, none of those were beneficial for too long. In May of 1830, the act was passed, to serve as a more permanent solution to the ongoing wars. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the right direction for the United States, as it created space for American’s to settle on, grow up with, and prosper on. The act was good, because it would lead to peace with the Natives, because of the new distance between Americans

Show More
Related

  • Comparison Of Jackson Vs. The Indian Removal Act

    341 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act, passed by congress, provided for the resettlement of all Native Americans occupying the east of the Mississippi to Oklahoma.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Indian Removal Act

    159 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was to exchange unsettled lands west of the Mississippi for indian lands. The impact of the Indian Removal Act was that the people could claim indian lands and they moved the indians to unsettled lands west of the Mississippi. According to the book it says that the indians felt forced to sell their land and move west. The Cherokee Nation refused to move or sell their land to the United States government.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Research Paper

    584 Words  | 3 Pages

    So down below this will explain in depth why the indian removal act of 1812 is not justified Well, for starters we actually killed them using muskets and swords killing the men who tried to stop them. as well as we killed them with diseases that we had and we starved them because we killed animals for sport and we introduced new animals to the ecosystem. and intern were killing their way of life now they may have killed some of us but that is like saying a burglar runs into your house kills your family and then is trying to kill you.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Analysis

    214 Words  | 1 Pages

    The main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 is to have a process where the President could grant land on the west of the Mississippi River to the Indian Tribes that agreed to give up their homelands. One of the main points of the Indian Removal Act was for the President of the United States to divide the land, where the Indian Tribes will reside, into districts and let them be distinguished from others. Another main point of the Indian Removal Act is where the President of the United States has the right to exchange any or all of the districts where the Indian Tribes reside at. The last main point of the Indian Removal Act is where the President of the United States promises the Indian Tribes a country for a country. I think the Indian

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Research Paper

    425 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was not justified, not everyone agreed and signed the treaty, of the Native Americans who did decided to move, many ended up dying, and in wars later on they sided with the Americans and fought with them. First of all, not everyone agreed and signed the treaty. The Cherokee and many other Native Americans were treated unfairly. They were also often cheated out of deals.

    Read More

  • How Was Andrew Jackson Indian Removal Act Justified

    846 Words  | 4 Pages

    President Jackson promised the Indians horses and shelter but he did not give them anything. Indian removal act was not justified because President Jackson was not being a good leader, they Cherokee Indians were there first and claimed their land before the white settlers came, lastly the Indian Removal was very cruel and

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson's Congress To Pass The Removal Act Of 1830

    254 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Indians that left their homeland would be granted by the president land west of the Mississippi River, and this law would extend financial and material assistance on their travel. With this act in effect, Americans were permitted to influence, bribe, and threaten tribes

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Dbq

    618 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was passed in the year 1830 and by 1837 46,000 Native Americans were forced from their lands. “Long time we travel on way to new land. People feel bad when we leave old nation. Women cry and make sad wails. Children cry and many men cry, and all look sad like when friends die, but they say nothing and keep on going towards west.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Of 1830

    346 Words  | 2 Pages

    From a historical point of view cultural assimilation happens when a person or a group loses its native culture to the dominant group in their society. On the other hand, cultural pluralism takes place when smaller group within a larger society are able to maintain their culture and belief in which are accepted in the wider society. The process of assimilation is slow and gradual because it take some time to for a person or groups to fully make an adjustment into their new society. In history, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was passed by Congress under the administration of President Andrew Jackson. The law states that the president can authorize to negotiate with southern Native American tribes for their removal to federal territory west

    Read More

  • Removal Act Vs. Remini's 'Andrew Jackson And His Indian Wars'

    438 Words  | 2 Pages

    Robert V. Remini argued in “Andrew Jackson and His Indian Wars” that the Indian Removal Act was the only way to save the Native Americans from being extinct. He proposed this act to not only to save the Native Americans from being extinct, but also ““... could and would protect them fully in the possession of the soil, and their right of self government...to be our equals in privileges, civil, and religious.”” (285). He had been concern about the safety of the Native Americans for many years since white settlers were hungry for land and would do anything for it. Moving to the west would let the Native Americans do what they wanted to do and live freely.

    Read More

  • How Was The Indian Removal Act Justified

    1297 Words  | 6 Pages

    . . hb Also there were a lot of controversy with the americans and the indians. mjm The Indians didn’t want to move, had their land taken away, and wasn’t seen as equals are perfect reasons why this act was not justified

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Research Paper

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Essay

    1573 Words  | 7 Pages

    No, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was not valid. Looking through the Cherokee Constitution of 1827, it is almost an exact copy of the preamble of the United States Constitution, except for one detail. With relations getting worse between the Cherokee and United States, some ladies from Ohio decided to speak up, and say that the Cherokee should not be kicked out of their ancestral land. Without waiting for the consent of the Cherokee people, President Jackson begs to the Cherokee people to leave before harsh consequences come their way. All of this is occurring without any remembrances of the Treaty of 1802 and Treaty of 1819.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson's Economic Policy

    782 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was the movement of about 16,543 Native Americans across the nation’s land to create more farming space for crops necessary for the survival of the american people. Andrew Jackson had moved tribes such as the Choctaw, Creek, Seminole, Chickasaw and Cherokee, also known as the five civilized tribes, west of the Mississippi River. Jackson’s rebuttal for the removal of the Natives consisted of telling the people that moving the Indians would separate them from the white settlements, free them from the power of the states, and would stop their extinction. Unfortunately, Jackson had created a path of death for the remaining Indians that would not give up their land willingly. He then used armies of men to push out the leftover tribes.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Allowing The Cherokee To Stay

    609 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The right thing to do is not always the popular thing to do. In this case, defending the Cherokee is the right thing to do.” This quote was stated in the “Allow the Cherokee to Stay” article written by Joan Marshall. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a law that was passed when the Americans tried clearing out the Indians in Georgia so that they can take over the land. They moved almost all of the Indian tribes to a place in Louisiana called Indian Territory.

    Read More

More about Indian Removal Act Dbq

Open Document