ipl-logo

Indian Removal Act Dbq Essay

530 Words3 Pages

The air is heavy with the smell of gunpowder. All across the horizon is littered with bodies. The cries of children can be heard, piercing through the fog. All the carnage, this sadness carried through the breeze. This could all be stopped with one thing. The Indian Removal Act. States are getting restless, in need of more land. Native Americans protest against them, arguing that it was their land. Treaties were the only thing they could hold on to. Infectious greed of the Americans grew stronger by the minute. This is where The Indian Removal Act comes in. In January of 1830, a bill was introduced into Congress for reviewing. Argument after argument, the parties fought against each other. President Andrew Jackson strongly approved of this law, in fact he was the one who introduced it into Congress.

President Andrew Jackson, when he first became president strongly supported the Indian Removal Act. He believed it would benefit the Indians greatly. The Indians asked him for help considering the treaties they had made. In Document 2, President Andrew Jackson addressed the concerns,” I informed the Indians inhabiting parts of Georgia and Alabama that their attempt would not be [accepted] by me, and advised them to emigrate beyond the MIssissippi River. . . .” Jackson …show more content…

In Document 1, President Monroe argued that the removal of the Indians would,” not only shield them from impending ruin, but promote welfare and happiness . . . [If this doesn’t happen] their degradation and extermination will be inevitable. In other words, Monroe was saying that removing the Indian tribes and transporting them to another place would greatly benefit them instead of their land before. If they stayed in their original land, complete destruction will befall upon them. The greed of the American people comes to no end and all they want is more. More land. More rights. More

Show More
Related

  • How Did Andrew Jackson Be Satisfied To Mark The Face Of A 20 Dollar Bill

    1071 Words  | 5 Pages

    His views regarding the Indians were distorted by his absolute loathe towards them, creating a toxic environment for the Natives. Due to the constant requests and suggestions to relocate the Indians west of the Mississippi River, a dry place seemingly uninhabitable for farm life, Andrew passed the “Indian Removal Act” which remunerated the “Five Civilized Tribes,” the Creek, Chickasaw, Seminole, Cherokee, and Choctaw to abandon their lands and move west of the Mississippi. Although this may sound fair, paying the tribes to migrate someplace else, the lands that they were given was much too unsuitable for the sustainability of crops and the conditions they had to endure during their journey west were absolutely sickening. Some tribes accepted the policy, whereas the Cherokee was defiant against the unethical policies, stating that the policy did not apply to them as they were a separate and independent nation with their own individual laws. Jackson, being the tyrant he is, ignores the Cherokees’ statements and continues to enforce the policy, even though the Supreme Court had already settled on a final ruling.

    Read More

  • How Fair Was Andrew Jackson Dbq

    428 Words  | 2 Pages

    President Andrew Jackson was not a good leader. I say this because he was unfair. President Jackson Signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. The Indian Removal act was started because people in Georgia wanted to expand their land to the South so they could plant more crops. By doing this the Indians were forced to move out of there land.

    Read More

  • Georgia Vs Cherokee Case Study

    611 Words  | 3 Pages

    2.2 In Andrew Jackson’s argument, Jackson addresses his opinions about the treaty and Cherokees that let us know the main purpose of this treaty, “[i]t seems now to be an established fact that [Cherokees] can not live in contact with a civilized community and prosper.” And he also explains the new settlements and those people’s lives, “…the Indians are removed at the expense of the United States, and with certain supplies of clothing, arms, ammunition, and other indispensable articles; they are also furnished gratuitously with provisions for the period of a year after their arrival at their new

    Read More

  • How Did The Transcontinental Railroad Affect Native Americans

    1176 Words  | 5 Pages

    An Indian Removal Act was signed into law by president Andrew Jackson in 1830, it authorized the president to grant unsettled lands in the West in exchange for Indian lands within the state borders. Some Indian tribes accepted and followed the relocation policy peacefully, but many resisted. During the period after the Civil War, millions of people moved from farms and cities in the East and Midwest, and immigrated from European and Asian countries, to the cheap land and fields with gold and riches in the West to improve their lives with a greater possibility of success. The completion of transcontinental railroads to the west after the Civil War opened up vast areas of the West for settlements and economic development. This huge westward movement, which was a result of the Civil War and Reconstruction, affected the Native Americans catastrophically.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Andrew Jackson's Problem With The Indian Removal Act

    203 Words  | 1 Pages

    When Andrew Jackson became president in 1829, the Native American condition worsened. Congress allowed the president to solve the "Indian problem" with the Indian Removal Act of 1830 (O’Neill 11). This act gave President Jackson permission to offer tribes land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their tribal lands east of the Mississippi. Politicians of the day considered this a generous offer, (O’Neil 11) but the Native American population would not surrender their homes so easily. So the federal government used some shady tactics in order to get many tribes to accept the agreement.

    Read More

  • How To Expedite The Indian Removal Act 1830

    614 Words  | 3 Pages

    This included addressing Indian claims that arose from such laws. By 1830 many Indian agents believed that the relocation of the Indians could be achieved by persuasion, contrastingly, President Andrew Jackson, determined to use force, introduced the Indian Removal Act (1830) to expedite the removal. By this time most people were making reference to the Florida Indians as the Seminoles, and Creek identity among them became distant in location and language. This separation occurred despite pressures from both Creek claims

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Research Paper

    657 Words  | 3 Pages

    The “Indian Removal Act”, for example, was put into action in order to clear out the land for white settlers to live upon. The United States used such shameful methods as the slaughter of native tribes as well as biological warfare through blankets covered in smallpox. Forced marches used to relocate the natives resulted in very high death rates. The “Trail of Tears” in 1838 was cause by the Indian Removal Act, and caused the destruction of the majority of the Cherokee tribe. After being removed from their homes, the Native Americans were placed in a small reservation with little land and resources.

    Read More

  • How Does Andrew Jackson Use Land As A Symbol Of Human Existence?

    918 Words  | 4 Pages

    Furthermore, President Andrew Jackson felt so passionately about owning land that he was willing to forcibly remove the indigenous people from their natural land. In his address to congress on The Indian Removal Act he writes, “. By opening the whole territory between Tennessee on the north and Louisiana on the south to the settlement of the whites it will incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier and render the adjacent States strong enough to repel future invasions without remote aid. It will relieve the whole State of Mississippi and the western part of Alabama of Indian occupancy, and enable those States to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power”. This captures the idea that by obtaining land Americans will be doing a greater deed than ridding the country of the “savage” Native Americans.

    Read More

  • Manifest Destiny Dbq

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    On May 28, 1830, President Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. Native Americans who didn’t want to relocate would become citizens of their home state. The Indian Removal Act separated Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites. free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Research Paper

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

    Read More

  • Why Is Andrew Jackson Wrong

    552 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act is going to be controversial bill that is going to help President Andrew Jackson complete two things which was pay the national debt of with Indian Land Sales and most importantly move the Native American out of East, especially Georgia, to open new land for eager white settlers. In a letter from Alfred Balch to Andrew Jackson on January 8, 1830, Alfred said that about the possibility of the removal act, “The removal of the Indians would be an act of seeming violence. But it will prove in the end an act of enlarged philanthropy.” He went on to write, “…cannot exist in a state of Independence, in the vicinity of the white man.”

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Trail Of Tears

    277 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rather than forced Native American to leave their land, The president Jackson and the congress could develop some activities to share the outcome of gold with them. They could find and arrangement which could result to leave them on their land and share the outcomes of the exploitations of the gold and others natural resources.

    Read More

  • Cherokee Nation 1830 Analysis

    402 Words  | 2 Pages

    On July 17, 1830, the Cherokee nation published an appeal to all of the American people. United States government paid little thought to the Native Americans’ previous letters of their concerns. It came to the point where they turned to the everyday people to help them. They were desperate. Their withdrawal of their homeland was being caused by Andrew Jackson signing the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830.

    Read More

  • The Trans-Mississippi West

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    The government tried to force assimilation on Native Americans as well as an attempt to “kill the indian, save the man.” These ideas and policies are similar to those popular during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Jackson developed a sense of ‘paternalism’ towards indians and believed he was saving them by forcing them to live out west of the Mississippi river away from white culture. The difference was that Jackson did not believe in assimilation of indians into white culture, he believed they should be kept separate. With the help of the Federal government removing indians from land west of the Mississippi, Americans were

    Read More

  • Manifest Destiny And The Market Revolution

    1108 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Market Revolution generated a drastic change in the United States economy and altered gender barriers while at the same time accomplishing this in a provocative manner. This economic boom occurred around the first half of the 19th Century. The economic boom was achieved by inventions such as a transcontinental railroad system which resulted in a better transportation system which improved trade and the cotton gin which sped up the rate of removing seeds from cotton fiber. However like what the great Hugo said, “The brutalities of progress are called revolutions. When they are over we realize this: that the human race has been roughly handled, but that it has advanced”.

    Read More

More about Indian Removal Act Dbq Essay

Open Document