ipl-logo

Indian Removal Act Dbq Essay

552 Words3 Pages

How would you feel if you were told that you have to move off of your own land to somewhere else just for the pleasure of other people? The Indian Removal Act will not only be cruel and harsh, but it will be extremely wrong on our part. What side do you stand on? Are you in favor of, or against it? You surely, will not only disagree with this act, but will be completely against it. By far, the Indian Removal Act is a very barbarous thing to put our fellow Native Americans through. To begin with, removal of the indians is a very bribing and forceful action. The fact that we would all take the measures to force them off of their land is uncalled for, especially since it is land of their own. We cannot just bribe and trick the tribes for the comfort of ourselves, all stated in Document 6, Senator Peleg Sprague. In Document 5, Theodore Frelinghuysen, Frelinghuysen’s speech mentions how removal of the tribes would involve, very violent actions and crowded acres as they will be forced onto lands west of the Mississippi. You, the people of The United States need to consider the misery you’d be in if you went through this devastating time. …show more content…

In Document 3, Cherokee Nation, a cherokee tribal member gave a speech that one part states, “This is the land of our Nativity; the land of our birth. We cannot consent to abandon it for another far inferior [place]”. Meaning they will not give up there land that they were born on, for somewhere else. Theodore Frelinghuysen’s speech, (Document 5, Theodore Frelinghuysen) mentions that a long, long time ago, God placed the tribes where he wanted them, which means they were here way before us, and we should not force them to move. Both documents infer that their land is important and sacred to them. They truly, should have the rights to stay on their land, no matter

Show More
Related

  • Comparison Of Jackson Vs. The Indian Removal Act

    341 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act, passed by congress, provided for the resettlement of all Native Americans occupying the east of the Mississippi to Oklahoma.

    Read More

  • Letter From Killers Of The Flower Moon By David Grann

    712 Words  | 3 Pages

    We like to think of our land as our land, but is it really ours? We all know of Squanto and how he helped the pilgrims survive, yet we fail to show our appreciation. After helping these new people to their land, the Indians including the Osage are driven from their land to deserted reservations meant specifically for them in the Indian removal act. To make matters worse, the land rush of 1889 had the Osage moved to even smaller areas. Now the Osage were relying on the government to support them as they knew not how to plant crops and could not scavenge as they used to.

    Read More

  • Bill Debates Between President Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

    726 Words  | 3 Pages

    As if they were messing with their culture, so many of the people formed problems with President Jackson because of it. Eventually the bill passes through the Senate and the house in late April and May. The whole Indian Removal Act was just a way to get Native Americans the full title to the new land. The government was going to pay

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act Of 1790

    1501 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Dbq Essay

    530 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Document 1, President Monroe argued that the removal of the Indians would,” not only shield them from impending ruin, but promote welfare and happiness . . . [If this doesn’t happen] their degradation and extermination will be inevitable. In other words, Monroe was saying that removing the Indian tribes and transporting them to another place would greatly benefit them instead of their land before. If they stayed in their original land, complete destruction will befall upon them. The greed of the American people comes to no end and all they want is more.

    Read More

  • How Was The Indian Removal Act Justified

    885 Words  | 4 Pages

    With all the values and rules that the United States hold, a question has to be answered: Was The Indian Removal Act Justified? Due to the benevolent policy of the government, the protection of the Natives,and the improvement of general welfare, it should be

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Pros And Cons

    733 Words  | 3 Pages

    What if someone had come to your home and told you that you and your family had to relocate to a new place? This had been the home you grew up in, your parents grew up in, and your grandparents had grown up in; and the property your home sat on had been in your family for generations. How would you deal with federal officers telling you that you had to leave the only home that you had ever known? Imagine how the Indians felt when the Indian Removal Act was passed. Native Americans were pressured to negotiate treaties for relocation from their homelands in the East to Indian Territory in the West; so that the white settlers could expand their colonies.

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Jackson's Presidency Corrupt

    764 Words  | 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson’s presidency was a turning point of sorts for the United States. For the first time ever there was a president “of the common man”, as he was referred to. Prior to him getting into office, the United States a fledgling nation, had yet to see anyone other than high-ranking, old money aristocrats in office. It can be hard to feel fully represented and provided for when your government is unfamiliar with your problems and needs. These was not an issue that was unfamiliar, in fact the problem of illegitimate representation was what the colonists had sought to escape when under Britain’s rule.

    Read More

  • The Indian Removal Act By Andrew Jackson And John Ross

    476 Words  | 2 Pages

    Would you remove an abundance of Indians from their homes for money? That is what the Indian Removal Act did. Hundreds of Native Americans were taken from their homes. Andrew Jackson and John Ross had a debate on if they should get rid of the Indian Removal Act or if they should keep it. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the right direction.

    Read More

  • How Did African Americans Lose Their Capture

    564 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the proposals prior to the journey, officials made people believe it would be an easy journey. The language of the Indian Removal Act foreshadowed the horrific treatment of the Native Americans referring to them as savages and barbarians. The actions towards Native Americans were humiliating and degrading including being dragged from their homes and buried in unmarked graves. These Native Americans were forced to leave their entire livelihood behind only to support the white cause, which did not benefit them in any

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: Argument Against The Constitution And Basis Of Democracy

    741 Words  | 3 Pages

    This was therefore against the constitution and basis of democracy, meaning that Andrew Jackson, who established the act, went against democratic principles. After making them sign treaties promising that their land would not be taken away from them, Jackson’s men took away their land. This went against governing principles, to disregard a treaty is a sign of corruption and injustice. There is no place for injustice in a democratic government otherwise it starts resembling to a dictatorship or a monarchy. Furthermore, the Native Americans are American citizens in modern times and even if not considered back then it was a violation of the people's rights, the Native Americans did not choose to leave but we forcefully pushed out of their land.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Research Paper

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Essay

    1573 Words  | 7 Pages

    This shows that United States believes that they are the supreme ruler, and they can do whatever they want to do without the consent of others. With no emotions from the United States, they decided to force the relocation of the Cherokee with armed

    Read More

  • Cherokee Move To Indian Territory Essay

    760 Words  | 4 Pages

    First off, the U.S was being extremely generous when giving the Cherokee such a good offer if they moved. This good deal included 70,000 square miles of land west of the Mississippi River, for their people to move out to, and thrive on. With 70,000 square miles of land, it was enough for more than one square mile per person. It also included $5 million dollars, to help start their new lives out there as a people. The land that was given to them was in a desirable location.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson And The Trail Of Tears

    265 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nobody's lives would be the same after losing the ones they had lost during the long journey. The Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears were terrible events for the Native American people to live through. They lost lives, supplies, homes, and family memories.

    Read More

More about Indian Removal Act Dbq Essay

Open Document