Gemma Young
History 10
Dr. Bunn
February 14, 2023
Jackson’s Indian Removal Decision - Change or Continuity?
On May 28th of 1830, the Indian Removal Act was enacted by president Andrew Jackson. This act provided funding for uprooting the “Five Civilized Tribes” east of the Mississippi river and moving them into the territory now known as Oklahoma (Foner 393). Hot-tempered Jackson and his followers were eager to settle onto their land and establish farms, but the tribes resisted. Although the process of Indian removal was intended to be a peaceful exchange of lands, things became violent under Jackson’s orders. Militia invaded the native land and violently forced them on a devastating trek to new territory promised for them. Thousands of the
…show more content…
The government had been acquiring native land through cessions from as early as the 1720s (Document A). These land treaties had been a common occurrence for over a century. Jackson was no different in that sense, as the Indian Removal Act was seemingly rooted in the same motivations for expansion as the settlers that came before him. Furthermore, the majority of Americans during and leading up to the Indian Removal Act shared the same view of the Indians’ future as inhabitants of the United States. Most leaders of the country agreed that the Indians should be moved westward, so the territories in the Southeast could be further developed (Foner 280). Prominent figures such as Thomas Jefferson wanted to encourage the Indians to pursue agriculture in the west so their land could be utilized (Document F). Adding on to this idea, other government officials went so far as to dictate that the Indians’ had no claim to their land. In 1823, the case of Johnson v M’Intosh, the Supreme Court decided that tribes solely had a “right of occupancy” to their land. Likewise, President James Monroe proclaimed that the tribes had no right to keep their land from the common people in Document I. Like his late mother and countless other Americans, Jackson believed the Indians should be transported away (Presidential Podcast). The federal policies leading up to 1830 were similar to Jackson’s removal decision. In ways, Jackson’s expansion into Indian territory was akin to the federal policies and land cessions
Jackson presidency was marked as a new era in Indian-Anglo American relations by imitating a policy of Indian removal. Before the removal, he made about 70 treaties with Native American tribes both in the South and the Northwest. His First Annual Message to Congress and some others begins in December of 1829, which contained remarks on the present and future state of American Indians in the United States. He argued that it was for the Indians own well, that they should be resettled on the vacant lands west of the Mississippi River. During the time in Congress, debates on a bill didn’t begin until late February 1830.
Although this treaty explicitly stated the Indians’ rights to land, history- and even the Act itself- proved that Americans followed it very loosely, if at all. The Trade and Intercourse Act seemed to dampen the consequences of violating Indian land rights since it included the phrase, “not exceeding,” when referring to the jail- time and fees that any invasive Americans had to pay. 3. Andrew Jackson proposed moving the Indians because he wanted to end the tensions between the Federal and State Governments concerning Natives, to condense the Indian population in a single expanse of land, to open the area between Tennessee and Louisiana to the whites, and to prevent Indian and American conflicts. In the second paragraph of his Message to Congress in1829, Jackson said that the United States should move the Indians because it would put “an end to all possible danger of collisions between the authorities of the General and State Governments on account of the Indians.”
The Indian Removal Act of (1830) granted the creation of districts west of the Mississippi River, onto which eastern Indian tribes would be moved. Some tribes moved west willingly, but others, such as the Cherokees, were forcibly marched west on the “Trail of Tears”. When Andrew Jackson became president (1829–1837), he and other members of the government believed that the trade and intercourse act had failed to aeropathy deal with the Indian problem so he decided to build an efficient approach to the “Indian removal act”. To achieve his purpose, “President Jackson encouraged the Congress to accept the Removal Act of 1830. The Act established a process whereby the President could grant land west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes that
The Indian Removal Act The Indian Removal Act was signed as a law by President Andrew Jackson in 1830. This law was to remove and settle the Native Americans from East of the Mississippi River to the West, known as Indian Territory. This law also prohibited white people to settle in the nation. Thousands of Indians made attempts which were not violent. Many Indians refused to leave from their lands because they worked for them really hard to just be removed like that.
In today’s perspective we see Jackson action as inhumane and selfish for only simply satisfy his own need to manifest further into North America. Jackson on the other hand saw the removal act as preserving the culture of the Indians. The Indian problem was way more complex that just simply removing all of the Indians and shoving them westward. Jackson had a four solutions to choose from and believe it or not, the removal and relocation of the Indians was the most just. The first solution was just too simply destroy all of the Indians.
On May 28, 1830, President Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. Native Americans who didn’t want to relocate would become citizens of their home state. The Indian Removal Act separated Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites. free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions.
The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.
The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove
Around the 1820s, whites worked to increasingly survey and squat tribal lands. Indians often experienced great injustice from whites. Furthermore, in 1830 President Andrew Jackson issued for the Indian Removal Act, which granted him the ability to "exchange public lands in the West for Indian territories in the East" (255). Further evidence, Jackson's excerpt stated that, "It will relieve the whole state of Mississippi and the Western part of Alabama of Indian occupancy, and enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power" {Doc E}. With this
They were the most accepting when it came to transforming to the "civilized" life of the white settlers. In 1830, President Jackson convinced congress to pass the Indian Removal Act, which was “A measure that allowed state officials to override federal protection of Native Americans”(). There was absolutely no justification for why Andrew Jackson removed the Cherokee Indians from their land. In his State of the Union Address, he says "it is in the best interest of the Cherokee's to remove them west because they were not civilized"(2). Ultimately, Jackson wanted the land that the Cherokee Indians called home
The Indian removal act authorized Jackson to give the Indian federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for the land they occupied in the East and South. This act kicked the Indians out of their lands and caused them to walk on the “trail of
The real intentions behind the Indian removal were due to the Indians territory was known as a black belt, a favorable soil and climate, which the American prosperity and economy were relying in the commercialization and textile industrialization of cotton. (270). All in all, Jackson’s administration had the intention in expand the territory by forcing the “Five Civilized Tribes” to increase the cotton commercialization and textile industrialization in favor of the American economy. On the other hand, many white settlers from the North and the leaders of the “Five Civilized Tribes” oppose the Indian Removal Act, fearing what they would found in the new land to survive.
The Indian Removal Act was passed during Andrew Jackson’s presidency on May 28, 1830. This authorized the president to grant land that was west of the Mississippi River to Indians that agreed to give up their homeland. They believed that the land could be more profitably farmed by non-Indians.
Soon after becoming president, Jackson passed the former act which called for the relocation of native tribes from their homelands to a designated “Indian territory” in present-day Oklahoma. While Jackson had a clear idea of his plans, he befriended the tribes and promised them prosperity, friendship, and the possibility of becoming civilized children of God. In other words, he, the symbol of reassurance in America, stabbed the backs of all natives. Beyond the question of Jackson 's morality, what was the ultimate reason behind the removal? The answer to this is simple: white settlers wanted to grow and cultivate on Indian lands, and they attained this when the government pushed the natives out of their lands.
President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 which gave funds to move the Indians west of the Mississippi River. The state of Georgia annulled the constitution of the Cherokee and they ordered that their tribal lands must be seized. Even though the Cherokees were not doing anything wrong, the State of Georgia still shut them out and had their lands seized. The Cherokee tribe hired a lawyer and brought this case all the way to the Supreme Court. Chief Justice John Marshall upheld the Cherokee tribe's