In “Juan Gines de Sepulveda Belittles the Indians” (1547), the author uses the rhetorical appeals of ethos and logos to prove to the Spanish that the Indians of the New World should accept and embrace Spanish rule. The most prominent rhetorical appeal used by the author is logos, it is present even in the first sentences of the passage. Sepulveda does not waste any time getting to his point, and begins with the statement, “The Spanish have a perfect right to rule those barbarians of the New World and the adjacent islands, who...are as inferior to the Spanish as children to adults,” (3). Immediately, logos is being used by using the analogy of the natives as children and the Spanish as adults. Obviously, everyone knows that adults are superior to children, and by using this analogy Sepulveda points out that the natives are as naive as children, and need the guidance …show more content…
He continues to list things the natives of the New World do not allegedly have: literacy, recorded history, and definite laws; all things that seem so simple and arbitrary to the people of Spain. His logical argument is, “what temperance or mercy can you expect from men who are committed to all types of intemperance and base frivolity,” (3) or more simply, how can you expect these people, incapable of developing the basic parts of society, to lead themselves? The intended purpose is to persuade the audience, the Spanish, that the natives need leadership, and are much too lost to find it themselves. Near the end of the passage, Sepulveda says, “If this type of...nation had not been to their liking and nature, it would have been easy for them to...obtain a freer state and one more favorable to their interests.” (4), going on to imply that since they hadn't done that, they were opening themselves up for outside leadership and admitting that they themselves were not ready to
In Juan Gines De Sepulvedas' paper titled, “The Second Democrates,” he gives a description of how the Spanish should have the right to rule over the Native Americans because they are an inferior race. Sepulveda goes into detail to tell people that the Spanish showed gentleness and humility after having won the war with the Native Americans, by protecting them from other tribes. Later on in his writings, Sepulveda described the Native Americans as illiterate people, having no monuments to represent their history, except for the sad pieces of art they drew by hand. He continued to write that the natives were cowards because less than hundred stood against the Spaniards, but what can you expect
Throughout his second letter, Cortés constantly refers King Charles V as the ”Very Great and Powerful, and Very Catholic Prince, Most Invincible Emperor, Our Lord” or “Your Scared Majesty”. Besides his high regards for the king, his violent actions are under the justification of gaining vassals for the crown. The pillaging and chaos of the New World under the authority of Cortés prove how the Spaniards have very little regards and respect for native cultures. The prosperity and lives of the natives were small prices to pay to satisfy Spain’s greed for power and wealth. Cortés’s second letter illustrates how Spain valued acquiring territories and the unwavering loyalty
Straight off he claims, “From the fact that the Indians are barbarians it does not necessarily follow that they are incapable of government and have to be ruled by others, except that they have to be taught about the catholic faith and to be admitted to the holy sacraments. They are not ignorant, inhuman, or bestial.” (pg.3 paragraph 1) De La Casa acknowledged that, while their practices were less evolved than the Spanish, it did not mean they were any less human or developed than the Spanish, and only need a guiding hand to the Catholic faith. He described how the Spanish treated the natives like dogs, forcing them to mine for precious minerals, and compared the Conquistadors to Romans. He wrote an argument defending the natives, explaining they were not any less intelligent then the Spanish and “…they are so skilled in every mechanical art…”
I decided to start a conversation about the use of Native Americans as logos for sports teams. I have always had strong opinions on this topic because, even as I child, I could see that this practice was offensive. My first memory of this topic was in middle school when another team in our area used American Indians as their mascot, and my sister and I thought it was weird that they’d use people instead of animals. As I have come to read more and more about this topic, I find it hard to believe some people would actually be okay with using an entire culture for the purpose of making a joke of them.
In the 16th Century, Spain became one of the European forces to reckon with. To expand even further globally, Spanish conquistadors were sent abroad to discover lands, riches, and North America and its civilizations. When the Spanish and Native American groups met one another, they judged each other, as they were both unfamiliar with the people that stood before them. The Native American and Spanish views and opinions of one another are more similar than different because when meeting and getting to know each other, neither the Spaniards nor the Native Americans saw the other group of people as human. Both groups of people thought of one another as barbaric monsters and were confused and amazed by each other’s cultures.
In this week’s reading, “Spanish Conquest” by Elizabeth Carmichael and Chloe Sayer discuss the subjugation, ethnocide, and struggle the indigenous population of Mexico endured during the Spanish conquest. The Spanish conquistador, Hernan Cortez, enslave and forced the Aztecs to believe that Christianity was the one true religion. Therefore, the indigenous people were forced to convert their faith through the Spanish missionaries to lose their indigenous roots. Later, the authors explain the many difficulties and conflicts Spanish priest underwent to teach the Christian faith to the Aztecs. The Spanish friar first taught the indigenous people Christianity in Nahuatl.
However, he uses this image to argue against such common misconceptions and mentions that there “was no apotheosis no ‘belief that Spaniards are gods,’ and no resulting native
This power imbalance and these payments are key in the subjugation of the natives. Furthermore, the paternalism of the Spanish toward the Indigenous peoples is obvious: “Captain [Cortes] stared at him [Cuauhtemoc]…then patted him on the head” (p.117). Post-conquest, and still today, “difficult relations” between the descendants of the Indigenous peoples and the “others” (p.117) still exist. The European view of the natives “as idolatrous savages” or, on the contrary, as “models of natural virtue” (p.175) demonstrate the versatile and often contradictory views held. Similarly, the Aztecs at times saw the Spaniards as gods, and other times as gold-hungry savages who “fingered it like monkeys” (p.51).
Music is a powerful force that people make every day. Music expresses what one person is feeling and it can pass on and relate to others. Whether it the beats or the lyrics of music it can make us feel a certain way. Many rappers though out the years use their voice to speak up for the people that believe they do not matter. Music gathers people together because we relate to the lyrics that are being said.
of schedule Spanish conquistadors, numerous evangelists considered themselves to be siding empathetically and defensively with the indigenous people groups. In 1537, Pope Paul III pronounced that Indians were not mammoths to be slaughtered or oppressed, but rather people with souls fit for salvation. At the time, this was comprehended to be an edified perspective of indigenous individuals, and one that good natured teachers tried to empower. Letters from ministers who lived among the Indians give us a feeling of the worries numerous held for the welfare of tribal people groups. A letter by Franciscan monk Juan de Escalona reprimands the "shocks against the Indians" conferred by a Spanish legislative head of what is presently New Mexico.
What Caused the Pueblo Revolt? Angelico Chavez believes the Pueblo Revolt was caused by the establishment of a new leader, Domingo Naranjo. As described to the Spaniards, Naranjo was a tall, black man with yellow eyes, and faked the image of the god Pohe-yemo. Domingo Naranjo was a Pueblo leader who claimed religious exile so he could gain the “power and revenge.”
José Martí was a brilliant 19th century writer, poet, political and revolutionary leader, and Cuban intellectual; however, above all else, José Martí was a proud Cuban citizen. Though born to two Spanish parents, Martí never waivered in his identity as a son of Cuba, and he would spend—and eventually give—his life fighting for the cause of Cuban independence. Martí loved his native country, and desired freedom and pride for all Cubans. Never was this more apparent, than in his poem, “Versos Sencillos” (Excerpts from Simple Verses). The resistance from oppression infused with Cuban patriotism prevalent in this piece, is central to Marti’s message and to the Cuban Revolution as a whole.
For this week I decided to write a summary of chapter 11: Anglo-Saxons and Mexicans. The new political ideologies were created between 1830 to the 1840s. These new ideas were influenced by pride and obvious racism. These beliefs inspired the idea that American Anglo-Saxons were the dominant force and that they should be the ones to shape the destiny of others. The idea of the American Anglo-Saxon race was influenced by the American Mexican war.
In 1550, Emporer Charles V summoned a debate to determine how Spain would deal with the Native Americans. Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda and Bartolomé de Las Casas engaged in discourse about this topic: Sepúlveda denigrated the Natives while de Las Casas defended them. Sepúlveda felt that the Native Americans were basically barbaric sub-humans, and that the Europeans were greatly superior to them. He felt that Christianity was far more altruistic than the Natives’ religions. However, Las Casas felt that the Natives should be treated equally, since he believed Jesus died for the Natives just like he died for the Europeans.
Does the immigrant migrate with more than just the luggage they carry? Scott Russell Sanders argues and contends that when mass migrations occur, not only do they bring themselves and belongings, they also bring ideas along with them. Specifically going in depth with northern America's history as it is known as the melting pot of the world. From the Spanish conquistadors to talk of interstate construction. Within Scott Russell Sanders passage he depicts the notion that migrations bring ideas by using historical allusions and the repetitive anaphora of ‘our’ in his writing.