Junk Food Tax Case Study

The U.S’ economy is based on consumers’ demands, meaning what you buy is what the U.S will provide and sell. If consumers stopped buying an item, meaning there are no demands for it, the U.S has no reason to supply it. #4) The locavore movement suggests the solution of buying locally; which will support local farmers, instead of foreign distributors.

It will decrease sales and increase customer complaints, returns etc. Further our customer will move to other competitors due to bad quality products and especially perishable products such as fruits and vegetables. Therefore it is important to curry out Supplier audits to identify suppliers who can provide us with quality, fresh products. 4.5 Further to above risks, Fruito has been purchased from unauthorized suppliers which has poor quality and high price rate. When Fruito purchased from theses unauthorized suppliers, the Company increases cost of purchase and unable to provide products for reasonable rates for our customers.

The purpose of the bank is for countries to store any extra food in the bank so that countries which are in need can withdraw this food (586). However, this bank will only encourage poorer nations to rely on the food of other countries to sustain their rapidly increasing population. The poor countries will be greedy and only take food without adding food to the bank. This unequal sharing of food takes away the potential for the generous nations to increase their own population. The bank will also remove the natural checks in place on poor countries.

As this plays an important part because as the income level is relatively lower, the income per capita of Malaysians will result in a low purchasing power that makes Malaysia a price sensitive market. So the solution is that Tesco may have to change the products, such as lowering the quantity, lowering the price so that consumers can spend the product that they can afford in relation with their income levels. The increase in unemployment level of citizens in Malaysia has been a major concern for the government. Therefore the Malaysian government appoints employment restrictions for all the multinational companies in Malaysia to hire their local people.

The three main debates include pooling/ socialization of risk, the presumed conflict between equality and efficiency, and whether the existence of the welfare state stimulates of shows the economy. For efficiency and equality the conflict is what the outcome of the economy will be. The concern is that the market system will damage and crumble if more social programs that give to the poor are created, because it will lead to higher taxes and stricter regulations. Production will be cost effective, therefore producing fewer

For those who argue against raising the minimum wage, their main argument is based around the fact that it will cause unemployment, or decrease employment. Businesses will have to start cutting the hours of employees in order to stay profitable. They will also need to raise their product prices to continue profitability. One major advocate

According to a recent study a junk food tax is aimed to reduce the number of people that addicted to eat junk food. Unfortunately, The disadvantages of junk food tax that people going to pay for eating a junk food which can consider as a wasting of the money for some people, but it will be an advantage point at the same time because that eventually will lead to

In order to maximize the profits, monopolists increase the price and reduce the quantity of outputs when demand is inelastic and vice versa when the demand is elastic. This will create an underutilization of the resources and the ramification is the increase in unemployment and dead-weight loss in the society. The higher price charged by the monopolists obviously will reduce the wages for the laborers and thus increases the social cost of monopoly. According to Wan Sulaiman Wan Yusoff (2014), these situations are not consistent with the injunction of Al-Quran and Al-Sunna, because they are antisocial and exploit as well as deprive the poor and the community as a

DETERMINANTS OF SUPPLY CURVE 1. COST OF PRODUCTION: An increase in the cost of inputs of production such as sugar, caffeine and colors causes an increase in the cost of production. This means that an increase in cost will cause the supplier less willing to supply at a given rate. An increase in cost resulting from shortage of ingredients or disruption of supply is one of the common reasons why the suppliers cannot supply the product at a given price thus shifting the supply curve from S1 to S2.Adverse climatic fluctuations results in low productivity of agriculture which in turn affects Coca Cola.

Poppendieck later quotes Dan Glickman, Agricultural secretary at the 1997 National summit on Food Recovery and Gleaning, who states "There is simply no excuse for hunger in the most agriculturally abundant country in the world." (Poppendieck 573) Hunger cannot be solved by simply giving the hungry free food, that only continues the cycle of hunger. Poppendieck believes that by solving the issue of inequality the issue of hunger will be solved as well. It is clear that the distribution of resources if uneven, but what does that mean for those with less?

Armey also notes that “the tax code actually punishes savings and investment, by placing double or even triple tax burdens on capital. This lowers wages, destroys jobs, and depresses the living standards of all Americans.” The tax code needs to be reformed and a national sales tax is the best way to fix things. Although opponents may claim that it is regressive, the United States of America should reform its tax code by replacing income tax with sales tax because a national sales tax would cause our industry to grow, revolutionize our work force, and eliminate tax

I do not believe that it will be beneficial for the United States to pass a minimum wage policy that puts it over the poverty line. Basically, this will dive the prices of products up so companies can manage profits. Additionally, the demand for products will additionally drop because of the rise in prices. Since the demand for products will be dropping, this will lead to less money in the business owner’s packet, which can lead to job losses. Even though the minimum wage workers will have more money on pay day, the rise of goods will cause inflation, and they will still not be able to afford anything.

Because taking into account negative employment effects and increases in consumer prices induced by the minimum wage would wipe out any positive direct effects on household affected by the minimum wage. The minimum wage becomes even less effective in reducing income inequality when negative employment effects are taken into account. I will address the negative effects in sociological aspects by the

The rules to globalization only benefit few countries rather than many. Secondly, change the amount of losers in globalization process. For example the income in the U.S increased 11% between 1999 and 2004, but the middle class purchase ability decreased 3%. Another way to reform globalization is for the government not demoralize other values for materialistic values. For example many corporations contribute to materialism by their worldwide advertising and also the crooked high profits to the social cost and

In stark contrast to the prosperity of the 1920s, the Great Depression affected every industrialised country from 1929 to 1929. Under Republican administration, laissez faire capitalism incited the emergence of fundamental flaws within the manufacturing sector, as well as high tariffs. These policies ultimately precipitated extreme disparities in wealth and civil liberties. Although such policies were major causative factors in this era, they cannot be identified as the sole cause of the Depression.