Individual Case Challenge – The Fall of Lehman Brothers
The challenge I am going to approach in this Individual Case Challenge is the largest bankruptcy in the US history and one of the biggest worldwide, the fall of Lehman Brothers, with the company holding over $600 billion in assets.
Changing the way a leader acts is not an easy task and I believe it will be important to organizations because it will help understand how the failures of a leader can cause a major step back on the organization goals or even, in extreme cases as Lehman Brothers, bankruptcy. Moreover, I hope this analysis can help other leaders facing the same challenges to proceed in a different way.
There are many stakeholders involved in this challenging situation. In order
…show more content…
Prior to that, LB was the fourth biggest investment bank in the US and it’s considered that this fall had an important (even decisive) role in the unfolding of the 2008 world financial crisis.
At that time, the CEO (Chief Executive Officer) of Lehman Brothers was Richard Fuld. Fuld maintained his position since 1994 until the end, in 2008 and is criticized by many of having a major role on the outcome of the company. Since the beginning, he was viewed by the Americans as one of the top leaders of Wall Street. Little did we know that behind that figure was a man that led the company towards failure.
In the summer of 2005, Mike Gelband, the global head of fixed income, spoke to the administration about the firm’s high levels of leverage (22 times the equity worth). He predicted that a housing bubble would burst with massive repercussions, not only for LB, but also for the entire financial system. These effects from the bubble would come between 2007 and 2008 according to his predictions. However, instead of thinking of a response to these threats to the company and the American financial system, Fuld changed his position of a Leader to a mere decision-maker. He tried to create immediate profit for the bank, which involved increasing the activity of the mortgage-securities department. He didn’t take into account all the risk implied on this move and, even after hearing what Gelband said about the real-estate market,
…show more content…
We can verify these characteristics on the Mike Gelband’s approach and consequent decision on increasing the activity of the mortgage-securities department, one of the origins of the bankruptcy. There is a common thought that this entire situation could have been avoided. Fuld’s traits as a leader were not suited for the job and if only somebody had noticed that, Lehman Brothers could still be one of the most important financial banks in the world. The CEO was definitely a charismatic leader but he lacked several aspects that an Ethical Charismatic Leader should have in order to achieve positive results in the relationships among the employees and to give profit to the company. Fuld was considered a god in the financial business, as he raised the company’s market capitalization from $2 billion to $45 billion between 1993 and 2007. This feeling of greatness got to his head and made him focus on himself and on his own reflection to the financial world and this made him the person he was in his last two years in front of the company. An arrogant, narcissist, blunt and a confrontational CEO, as some describe
The American sub-prime mortgage crisis and asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) crisis happened in Canada had huge negative impacts on the financial industry. With the bankruptcy of several major banks in North America, investors lost their faith in financial institutions and were not willing to invest their assets to those financial institutions because of extremely high risks. As a competitive player in the industry, Goodwin also faced this threat and had poor performance. Internal Analysis Strength: Goodwin was a well-diversified company with six divisions in different but related market segments.
A bailout is a guarantee release of a person arrested by providing money with the bail. Likewise, bail bond is a warranty, used to obtain the approval of a criminal defendant who is required to release the bail. The following individuals have the highest bail bonds/bailouts ever: Michael Milken was on the $ 250 million bond list; that was the huge amount that American business magnate Michael Milken was placed on has his bail out prison.
Major Stakeholders The 1. Customers 2. Shareholders – 8,800+ Alaskan Native Americans 3.
Jack Welch created wealth while managing GE, in the 1980s he started to notice the necessities of the company. I do not believe this job could have been done any better, Mr. Welch noticed that competition was on the rise as well as outsourcing. The wages in America started to rise and he predicted that GE would not be able to keep growing and continue making profit how he envisioned it would so he started to implement his plan. He started buying well developed business and sold off the parts of those business that would not make huge profit or were not number one or two in their specific market. 2.)
The AIG Scandal 2005 started when AIG management was issuing a press release describing its third quarter earnings in 2000 to the public. The report showed that the premium of AIG was significantly increasing, while its loss reserves was decreasing by $59 million. However, according to many industry analysts, along with the positive earnings, AIG in fact should show an increase in its loss reserves as well. This caused the investors of AIG suspected that AIG was drawing down its loss reserves to boost its profits. The suspicious of the investors has unfortunately led to the falling of AIG stock price from $99.60 to $93.30 on New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
Angelo Mozilo and Countrywide Financial are not household names by any means. The story behind them played a huge role in our country's economic and housing history. The company went from nothing to worth over a billion dollars in a 40 year span. Countrywide Financial would play a role in the housing crash in 2008. Angelo Mozilo made quite the name for himself coming from a poor Italian family in the Bronx.
As a result, the nation was shaken and terrified. Additionally, it impacted the economic confidence of industries and customers. Leading to the 14 000 000 dollar loss in the stock market (Doc 3). Consequently, a number of businesses, banks, and a other organizations declared bankrupt. In a similar way, the public authority's efforts to become a part of the financial system resulted in more significant harm.
The first section of this essay focuses on the possible causes of corporate failures, including dominant CEO, poor strategic decisions and the failure of internal control.
There is a broad line between a captain of industry and a robber baron. A captain of industry brought an advanced, modern economy. They might have done a few shady acts, but people can look past it. A robber baron can be considered as thieves because of the way they gained money by destroying other companies. Many could say these millionaires are both.
Question 1 Peter Loescher was hired by Siemens when the company was experiencing extremely difficult times. After the bribery scandal, the main goal was to gain back the trust and respect from the customers and partners, as well as building a new vision. The company’s board of directors decided that they needed a person from outside of the company, who had no connection and loyalty to previous vision, and no affiliation with previous management team. In my opinion, the company owners hired Loescher for a specific purpose to change the overall team perception of how work is supposed to be done.
The leadership style of Lampert was director and analyser. All the data used in this document is secondary i.e. journal articles, webpages, presentations etc. Edward S. Lampert was appointed as the CEO of Sears in January 2013 and he stepped down from the post on May 2013 due to family health issues. Lampert was controlling half of the shares of company through his ESL fund investment. The company flounder under the leadership of Lampert and few analyst often ranked him as the world’s worst CEO (McIntyre & Calio, 2015).
Case Study 1: Banc One Corporation Asset and Liability Management Gizem Akkan So basically, the main problem Banc One Corporation has falling share prices as it is written from a 48 ¾ to 36 ¾ in April 1993. The basic reason behind this decline is that its exposure to derivative securities. This decline in share prices raises concerns among the Banc One’s Investors as well as its analysts since they are uncomfortable with huge amount of derivative usage particularly swaps. They think they are not able to measure risks they exposed so this create uncertainity about the firm’s financial stability.
Executive Summary Lehman Brothers were an investment bank involved in transactions worth billions of dollars and one of the most powerful investment banks in the world. Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008 following bad investment in the sub-prime mortgage market and used bad accounting practices called Repo 105 transactions to try and cover up the bad assets. This report sets out the use of the fraud triangle when describing the actions which led to the collapse. The pressure applied on the bank, the opportunity due to the lack of regulation to carry out the actions and the ability of the bank to rationalise their decision making.
Bankruptcy is a time of turmoil and uncertainty in any company, in addition to employees leaving and a loss of confidence from vendors and customers, management is restricted in their ability to make decisions and navigate the company. Because of the heightened uncertainty, many investors abandon the company, greatly reducing the value of the company, making the process even more difficult. However, savvy investors can generate large returns by entering the company at the right time as it begins to rebuild, so long as they can determine which companies will fail, and which will recover. H Partners is currently engaged in this process with Six Flags, having already gathered substantial returns on Six Flags’ senior debt, H Partners is determining
Ebbers leadership style changed from ethical to unethical during the downturn of the stock market and the effects it had on WorldCom shares. Ebber leadership style created an environment that left for little room for error. During telecommunications stock downturns Ebber was unable to come up with a strategy that would turn things around. During the initial phases of the Commission investigation into WorldCom’s accounting practices, Ebber was questioned concerning several low-interest loans he acquired from the board of directors. Shortly after Ebber was forced out by outside board members.