The most prominent and influential studies regarding the dimensions of the organizational culture have shown that a healthy organization leadership culture have a greater impact on the way the leaders transact the business of the organization. The four dimensions to consider while dealing with leadership culture are the individualism versus collectivism, feminine versus masculine, long term versus short term orientation and finally the power distance (Conner & Armitage, 2008).
3.2.1 Individualism versus Collectivism Leadership Culture
The leadership culture which supports individualists is least likely to enhance the ability of leaders to engage in their workplace environment and drive forward the development of the new startup company. The
…show more content…
The organization has employed as many females as males in the organization. The balance in the organization leadership structure enables the employees to have a wide choice of leaders to face while one has an issue (Bhattacharya, Sen, & Korschun, 2011). The gender balance also makes the Campaign 180 organization to comply with the global legislations which champions for women in leadership and gender equality which will enable the states to have an all round development.
The gender balance in the organization promotes diversity in the workplace hence can be a source of motivation to the employees. Both the female and the female employees will have a sense of belonging to an organization hence improvement executions of the assigned roles and duties to achieve the target goals. The female leaders have been described to be listening and caring hence able to create an ample working atmosphere which enables the employees to explore and maximize their potential (Conner & Armitage, 2008). The business organizations have placed female leaders in sections in key positions, so as to have a balanced leadership structure and ensure good leadership structure in
The good ‘ole boy’ system is still in utilized in most work centers. We need to establish the good ‘ole girl’ system where women connect and support each other. In this paper, I will introduce my artifact and give you a bit of insight into how women in the workplace struggle to get promoted, struggle to get ahead, be treated as an equal or better in the workplace.
Gender Stratification in The Workplace Over the years, women have fought their way through the various barriers thrown at them by society, they are now more educated, matching male participation rates in the labour force and they are seen to create more opportunities for themselves in the workplace. Despite these achievements, gender stratification still exists in organizations and corporations in the 21st century; this paper seeks to analyze the numerous reasons why women remain underrepresented in leadership positions in the workplace and how this causes a trickle-down effect for other females in non-managerial positions. One of the major factors influencing the progress women experience in their career advancement stems from the deep cultural-infused gender stereotypes associated
In developing this paper on leadership, I examined what was most important to me as a leader. As I reflected on my leadership philosophy, I thought about my experiences and the principals that I have learned through my own self-discovery and the observation of other leaders that I have had throughout my life. My leadership philosophy paper will focus on what leadership is to me, core values, and knowledge of others. In thinking about my definition of leadership, I thought of what was most important to me in and as a leader.
It was to establish the prevalence of gender divide in the corporate world that a research was conducted among its women employees right from executives to vice presidents and even above. More than 7000 surveys were held to collect the necessary data, including 360-degree feedback from Fortune 500 organizations, and one-to-one meetings with top executives from companies such as JP Morgan Chase and McDonald’s. The outcome was overwhelming – gender divide was found to be just one of the serious issues confronting them across the corporate world. As it
Since the establishment of the roles of society, women have been entitled to feminine roles that focus on family and nurturing. This roles allows for the subordination of women in the workplace since it makes distinctions between ideological constraints between genders. This opens up for the construction of gendered processes, that focus on the placement of roles that only “women” are allowed to acquire because of their practices. The author makes the example of how the managers contribute to gender gap and placement of roles that do not allow for the advancement of women in an organization. Acker argued, “…the production of gender divisions.
As long as the number of women in top leadership positions is very small, a woman is still who is there is seldom and special a deviation of the male norm. The “token status” is generating and confirming gender stereotypes. More than in other groups because such a single woman (in a male group) is always compared to a female role model. This effect is related to the "gender-role spillover".
Over the past 40 years defenders of women’s right have worked hard to assure growth of women's careers, trying to contest what is attribute as ‘the glass ceiling’ which is the invisible barriers that control woman from rising to top positions in corporate context. From the mid-90s European Government firms and private and public organizations have pursued a suit, bringing the recruitment of women at the upper levels of companies. The increasing prominence of leaders like Carly Fiorina, Hillary Clinton, and Condoleezza Rice accentuate the development in gender roles over the last half century. In the first paragraph I will discuss what do you need to be a successful leader and also about how women rises in organizational structures and practices,
Nice discussion post this week! You start off with a great definition of what leadership is. To me, it is hard to define what leadership is, especially in one sentence, but I agree with you that leadership is the action of leading others or an organization. I feel like it is when someone steps up and goes into the unknown as well. It is also important to mention that it is never just one single person.
Females are often times more selfless, cooperative and more likely to develop relationships within the workplace, but also share some of the same characteristics as males but not as often. Men and women also have different job satisfaction, especially when it involves doing their job as well as interacting and communicating with their coworkers, "females are more satisfied with jobs where their interactions with others is supportive and cooperative, whereas males are more concerned with more autonomous behaviors" (Amason & Allen, 1997, p. 958). Job satisfaction is very important when a manager is trying to make sure that their employees are happy and
When that resource, time, is being used to focus on gender verses productivity the company as a whole suffers. By achieving gender equality in the workplace, companies should start to see a significant amount of financial progression. According to the Workplace Gender Equality Agency, “It can also improve national productivity and economic growth” (WGEA). This statistic can make for a great motivator in the business world. Not only can removing the gender factor reduce the number of barriers associated with females, but it can show that a company is willing to give every employee an equal chance which can lead to attracting newer potential experienced employees of both genders.
Organization Culture and Leadership Analysis Using Sociology Paradigm Introduction This study has described the organizational culture and leadership of my company. I analysis my company adopt the?functionalism Paradigm, which is one of the major theoretical perspectives in sociology. See below is sociological paradigm. This paradigm developed by Burrell and Morgan classifies sociological theories along the two orthogonal dimensions of regulation vs. change and subjectivity vs. objectivity (Burrell & Morgan, 1979).