Montag is forced to explore his own meaning of individuality In a society of followers . When he visits Professor Faber at his home. He begs Faber, “I want you to teach me how to understand what I read,” . Montag is capable of physically reading out words, but he is unable to put any meaning or emotion behind the texts he reads. Montag desperately wishes too understand and think about the texts. However Montag is unable to complete to contemplate original and uninfluenced thoughts. Faber implores Montag to look inwards unto himself for this book in itself is just an inanimate object and that, ‘“the magic is only in what books say, how they stitched the patches of the universe together into one garment for us,”. The stress is placed on the individual …show more content…
The topic of thinking freely was explored as a major theme in the dystopian fiction “1984”. In this novel George Orwell writes of a world where one cannot even think freely, if you think an illegal thought the “thought police” will come and arrest you for a “thought crime”. It could be said that thoughts are for “1984” what books are in “Fahrenheit 451”, both are used as an outlet to express themselves but if found carrying out those activities you would be arrested. Montag struggles with conjuring up with original thoughts because he has never before had an outlet through which to reflect upon his own relationship with himself, he has never truly been himself. Montag’s mental loss of freedom can be contrasted with Caliban’s physical entrapment in “The Tempest”. Caliban's desire to be free is one that is based around physical beings. He wants the spirits to stop tormenting him and he wants to be free of the physical slavery that he is forced to do. Montag just wants to be free in his mind. Additionally, Caliban was once free and so has a better idea of what he wants. Montag has never in his life been free and so his desire is less focused and more
Have you ever been so involved with a book that you feel like you personally know each and every character? That when the book comes to an end you feel like a chapter of your life has just closed? What if you could never have that feeling ever again? Would it make you do things you could have never imagined, like breaking the law? Well this is an everyday problem for the people in the future in Ray Bradbury’s book Fahrenheit 451, when most books are deemed illegal, unless the government says otherwise.
Faber and Montag discussed how nobody listens to each other only to technology, Faber questioned Montag on why he changed his mind on books in which he replied, "We have everything we need to be happy, but we aren't happy. Something's missing. I looked around. The only thing I positively knew was gone was the books I'd burned in ten or twelve years. So I thought books might help”(82).
The other reason Montag’s transformation was painful was because he left behind his wife and home, furthermore, he also is grieving for Clarisse. Montag pleads with Faber, "My wife's dying. A friend of mine's already dead. Someone who may have been a friend was burnt less than twenty-four hours ago. You're the only one I knew might help me.
In Fahrenheit 451 Ray Bradbury describes a dystopian world in which society has become hostile to knowledge and literature because it threatens to bring out the differences amongst individuals. This attitude towards literature and books has made reading an illegal activity. This change in attitude towards books provides changes not only in the society but also in the individual; the lack of emotion and the lack of individualism are prevalent throughout the text. Although the problematic effects Bradbury predicted for humanity and the self are not likely to become this extreme, with the decline in reading and mass media becoming the center of attention it is not hard to see how close our future is beginning to look like that of Fahrenheit
In Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451, Montag, the protagonist and book burner, battles between the light and dark sides of society, first with Beatty, his boss, and the government and then with Clarisse, a neighbor girl and Faber, an English professor. Montag is stuck in the dark burning books and is ignorant to the world around him. He moves towards greater awareness when he meets Clarisse and is awakened to the wonders of deep thought and books. Finally, he risks his life by trying to save the books.
The book follows Guy Montag, a fireman who sets things on fire instead of put out fires. He enjoys his job until on one job an old woman decides to burn with her books rather than evacuate. Haunted by her death, Montag becomes confused on why books would mean so much to anyone. He then decides to find out for himself by reading books from a personal stash of stolen books. Montag has a personal revolution; he realizes the dangers of restricting information and intellectual thought.
The two of them decided to come up with a plan to show people that books are not worthless. c. Montag and Faber are living in a world where everyone believes that books have no value to them and should just be burned. However, these two characters think differently about them. Montag has been stealing books, and Faber has been teaching him about them. He learns that books reveal the bad parts of life, which is why many people hate them and decide not to read.
Montag flees his capture and stops at Faber’s during his escape. At Faber’s, he learns that he is being tracked by a mechanical hound with the whole world to watch at their television screens. Before departing Faber’s house, they both agree to meet in St. Louis where they will work with a printer to print more books. The novel comes to a resolution when Montag successfully avoids capture by traveling down the river toward the railroad tracks. At the railroad tracks, Montag meets a group of scholars that have the same hopes of lifting the censorship of literacy.
John Dos Passos once said, “Individuality is freedom lived.” The root of individuality lies in freedom. Without freedom, there is an inability to think for oneself and share one’s ideas. In a society where this freedom is lacking, people will not think for themselves and submit to whatever rule is enforced over them. In Fahrenheit 451, the government attempts to control freedom as a means towards reaching a perfect society.
To begin, the rising action of Fahrenheit 451 includes Montag’s internal conflict. This internal conflict initiates doubt in Montag. When Clarisse asks Montag “‘Are you happy?’”, he initially responds “Of course I’m happy” (Bradbury 7-8). However, it is evident that doubt has been planted in his mind, “What does she think? I’m not?”
Mindless entertainment and biased media could eventually lead to a conformist world rid of complex thought. Fahrenheit 451 is an accurate depiction of a future where intricate thinking and having different world views is discouraged. Conformity is enforced, books are burned, and almost everyone is ignorant about societal issues. Guy Montag, a fireman, starts to notice this after meeting a strange girl, and then tries to seek justice by committing various acts of treason throughout the book. Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury shows how the lack of intellectual content and individuality can falter society into a place rid of complex thought and multiple idealisms.
His contact with a 17 year old girl named Clarisse McClellan, an elderly woman who was willing to die for her books, and an old professor named Faber, help Montag start to question things and begin a transformation that takes him from the rule following, book burner; to an idea challenging, book reader
If Guy Montag had never met Professor Faber, he would have never had first doubts about his practice and purpose, and without his first doubts, the society would have continued regarding books as weapons containing conflict and violence instead of resources filled with knowledge and entertainment. Montag lives in a dystopian society of misery and lifelessness. Nobody is able to comprehend how the censorship of books completely eliminated everyone’s emotions. Without the addition of the character Faber, this society would continue running, with no disruption of thought or feeling.
In this instance his hands represent a rising desperation to learn about books, not his conscience, as is evident on his way to Beatty after his meeting with Faber. Montag has already consciously recognized and accepted his moral obligation to learn about books and stop burning them, so his conscience can no longer be controlling Montag’s hand without his conscious recognition if McGiveron is correct in his assumption that only Montag’s conscience independently drives his hands. Later, Montag kills Beatty out of subconscious desperation, self-preservation, frustration, and anger. McGiveron claims that Montag allows his “conscience” to drive his actions, but after killing Beatty, Montag has to rationalize the murder, something he would not have to do if his conscience has accepted it. McGiveron explores the conscience behind Montag’s “unintentional” actions, but fails to explore emotional forces that affect both his decision-making and his hands.
Montag internally conflicts with himself as he gradually begins to consider what books truly have to offer. For instance, “A book alighted, almost obediently, like a white pigeon, in his hands, wings fluttering. In the dim, wavering light, a page hung open… Montag had only an instant to read a line, but it blazed in his mind for the next minute as if stamped there with fiery steel… Montag's hand closed like a mouth, crushed the book with wild devotion, with an insanity of mindlessness to his chest.”