Indonesia Spits on Liberty’s Face by Treating Psychosocial Disabilities with Shackles
Introduction
Right of the disables are first designed under Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to safeguard that the disables can be protected equally in order to be able to savour life to the fullest as others who are not. The convention acknowledges those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others as the disables. It tries to spread international understanding on the rights of the disables and elevate them to get the same opportunities as others. Having a disability, therefore,
…show more content…
Among them are being tied to solid object –simply imagine tying your dog into a pole, disciplining them with violence, discrimination, abandonment, and various hatred, whether its physical or verbal, towards the persons. Among them, the most serious and inhumane practice are putting them in chain against their will. Until today, at least 18.800 people are still tied down in torture. Government are reacting on it pretty slow, at its most, they only do campaign named “Indonesia Bebas Pemasungan”, both in 1977 and 2014, but mainly the progress are slow and painful. A country of 250 million people, Indonesia has only 600 to 800 psychiatrists—one for every 300,000 to 400,000 people—and 48 mental hospitals, more than half in just 4 of Indonesia’s 34 provinces. Thus, it is safe to say that Indonesians are still in an ultimate lack of understanding, consisting of national acceptance to put mentally disabled people in …show more content…
In cases where people are diagnosed completely unable to make those decisions, where the illness or disability has decapitate their consciousness as a whole, then it should be through series of legal and medical consideration before even think to put them in chains. For this to happen, shoulder by shoulder approach and intertwined understanding between government, society, legal institutions and nongovernmental organization is paramount. Organization that empowers them should always exist, and it should be formed not only by people with disabilities, especially in advocating decision on, in and over their welfare. It should be always kept in mind that eliminating people’s freedom against their will when they commit no crime is a magnanimous insult to the liberty. Worse more if the shackling practice or forced institutionalization does not make them any better than suffer
The four case studies discussed in this book talk about how this phenomenon has negatively affected the people and places it has reached. The first case study deals with anorexia nervosa patients in Hong Kong and how America’s view on anorexia affected the people in Hong Kong. The second case studies talks about the Sri Lanka tsunami and the efforts of people to aid the victims of this tragedy. The third case study is centered on a schizophrenia patient in Zansibar. The fourth and final case study discusses a pharmaceutical company’s exploitation of Japanese depression patients (or lack thereof) to make a massive amount of money.
Richard Eyre once stated, change begins with understanding, and understanding begins by identifying oneself with another person; in a word, empathy. Nancy Mairs, a writer with multiple sclerosis, writes about her experiences of being a disabled lady, naming herself a “Cripple” by emphasizing how her interface of her diagnostics never change her perspective of interacting with people or viewing the world. Followed by a video watched in class in which it described Dr. Brene Brown terms, the difference between empathy and sympathy is that empathy: feels connection toward people’s emotions, or circumstance, but sympathy: is totally being disconnected from people's feelings, having a result of being completely the opposite, of empathy. In Mair’s essay, the word empathy or pity are one of the most essential components that she uses to build her essay as a way of evoking reader’s empathy towards her because of her
The Victoria Government Department of Human Services (2012) stated “the freedom to make decisions which affect our lives is a fundamental right that each of us should enjoy”. The decisions we make in our lives represent who we are and how we want to be perceived by the world – whilst taking into consideration our own morals, beliefs and goals. Supported decision-making (SDM) is a process by which “a third-party assists or helps and individual with an intellectual or cognitive disability to make a legally enforceable decision for oneself” (Kohn & Blumenthal, 2013). May & Rea (2014) stated that “supported decision-making assumes that all people, regardless of their ability or disability, have some capacity to be involved in decision making”.
In order to earn physical and mental equality among the citizens, the government tortures them by assigning them handicaps. For example, the beautiful had to wear ugly masks to cover their faces, the intelligent had to listen to piercing music to avoid them from thinking and the graceful or strong had to wear weights. Everybody respected the law some because they were afraid of the consequences, some other surrendered to the laws and some others started to break down and
In his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, Elie Wiesel asserts the following: “Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor never the tormented.” This quote means if we don’t speak up when people are being tormented we automatically take the side of the tormentor. “In Indonesia 57,000 People with perceived mental disabilities are shackled in confined spaces.” Like the Holocaust, the world should not remain silent when it comes to abuses against people with mental disabilities in Indonesia.
People may consider it as what might bring peace upon societies, but on the other hand it can truly be destructive. According to the writer’s opinion, people with natural disabilities should be provided with help to aspire for them to reach the level of those exceptional people who improve society. Without inspiration, such a society will have a great
Overview of Disability Rights in Canadian History Disabilities by definition, is defined as a mental, social, emotional or physical condition that limits a person’s movement, senses or activities. There are over 600 million people in the world currently suffering from numerous disabilities which include deafness, epilepsy, mental illness, developmental disabilities, behavioral problems, substance abuse, blindness, and obesity. Throughout history, the society has developed a various of different perceptions towards people with disabilities such as that their disability was a punishment from the gods, disabilities were contagious, and that witchcraft and demonic forces were the cause of such disabilities to individuals. Nonetheless, people
World Health Organization (WHO) has defined disability as an umbrella term for impairments. Disability is an individual with a health condition such as Down syndrome cerebral palsy and depression, body functioning or structure on activity limitation. WHO, (2016) supported that people with learning difficulties they deserve privacy and dignity like everyone The Health and community Care Act 1990 protect people service users from abuse or neglect so that deterioration can be prevented or to promote physical or mental health and to allow independence and social inclusion. It also to improve opportunities and life chances, to help families and to protect human rights around people in need of the services. It has been argued Department of health, (2015) state that “people are living longer, which means there are likely to be more people with complex
1.1 Describe the causes and effects of complex disabilities and conditions. Mental health issues ranging from the doubts and uncertainties have become a part of daily routine, towards serious long term situation which can be very complex for managing and having a diversifying impact on the overall live of the people. The usual child health leads to contribute towards overall development (Watson & Le Couteur, 2011). Therefore it is important to take special care of people with complex disability as they turn out to be sensitive enough about the situation and environment they are living in.
They argued that no intellectually disabled person should be executed under the basis of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution (APA, 1989). They argued that the disabilities related to intellectual disability are directly correlated to a criminal responsibility and the punishment for the criminal activity. They stated that if a person is intellectually disabled they are unable to not only understand their actions, but control their actions because they do not have the cognitive or behavior development that should have occurred during their development (APA, 1989). People with intellectual disabilities have a reduced ability to cope and function in the world because they have severe impairments in judgment making, logical reasoning, strategic thinking, and control of their impulsivity. This relates to the level of their ability to conform to the law’s requirements and to the degree of the defendant’s blame which is an integral part of the insanity defense.
Deinstitutionalization fundamentally consists of three different components: “the release of persons residing in psychiatric hospitals to alternative facilities in the community, the diversion of potential new admissions to alternative facilities, and the development of special services for the care of a noninstitutionalized mentally ill population.” Here, we expand that definition with the inclusion of intellectually and developmentally disabled persons. As we know, this group was similarly situated as ‘patients’ of institutions, and similarly inherited both the benefits and the problems of
In this report I will discuss both the Social and Medical Models, define their pros and cons and give a short reflection on my own opinion of the two models in everyday use today. Both the medical and the social models of disability describe how they see disability and how they feel disabilities and those suffering should be treated. Both models have very different views on the causes of, how disabilities should be taken care of and by whom and both have their strengths and weaknesses when it comes to caring for those with disabilities. Medical Model
Everyone has the human right in their lives. Patients who have a choice whether they can live or die. For example, website News Voice TV by Phannika Wanish reported that Tony Nicklinson, uses the right to choose to do Euthanasia, he suffers from locked in syndrome, he need to rely on others because he cannot move his body. He can move only his eyes and eyelids. When Tony Nicklinson has a condition worsened,
Disability is defined by World Health Organisation as “an umbrella term, covering impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions. Impairment is a problem in body function or structure; an activity limitation is a difficulty encountered by an individual in executing a task or action; while a participation restriction is a problem experienced by an individual in involvement in life situations”. Disability remains a major challenge throughout the world with disabled people facing hostile socioeconomic outcomes than people without disabilities, such as less education, worse health outcomes, less employment, and higher poverty rates (1). Physical disability is defined as: “an acquired or congenital physical and/or motor impairment
And a disabled person’s ambition is like all other human beings, the looks of pity and compassion negatively affect that ambition. People should embrace the disabled person and give them a helping hand, and they should have laws, which defend their rights, which should be respected. However, most societies do not have laws that ensure an equal life for the disabled population. It is a shame that the rights of the disabled people has turned many times to mere slogans.