It is considered here the unbalanced power, occupation, race, teaching in schools, etc. In this topic, I will more likely emphasize the social classes which causes inequality to the society and poverty. Social classes are set or groups of people in the society in which category they belong such as upper class, middle class and lower class. What made social inequality exist? One reason is the poverty that comprises of the lower class.
The article draws from references as studies done by the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) on the how the measure of wealth inequality between the richest nations is exceedingly high and may eventually lead to economic stagnation and slower economic growth in a nation’s economy. The article states that the top 20 percent of the population of the United States own eighty nine percent of net worth in the country, while the bottom 40 percent own less than a percent of net worth. Net worth in the article is defined as the total value of assets after the total value of liabilities is subtracted. I will explain how social stratification between the top twenty and bottom forty percent is caused by wealth inequality through four key sociological theories and concepts. Analysis A: In the Structural Functionalist perspective both groups are interdependent, meaning one group cannot exist without the other.
Black people face detrimental obstacles in daily life that severely decrease their opportunities in life due to racism. They also have to deal with social inequality due to their race which deems them as lower than and not as important as whites. Not only do they face these difficulties but they also have to deal with prejudice and discrimination from society as they are deemed as less and different from what society calls the norm. This movement is key in order to help change the views of today’s society. Society must come to realize that everyone should be treated as equal and not treated differently based on race in order to allow everyone the same life
Zinn claims most of the wealth belonged to the upper class, and the elite made much more improvement than the lower class. To prove his point, he uses statistics such as: “one-tenth of one percent of the families at the top received as much income as 42 percent of the families at the bottom” (Zinn 382). Moreover, to show the dreadful state of the lower class, he recounts, “every year in the 1920s, about 25,000 workers were killed on the job and 100,000 permanently disabled. Two million people in New York City lived in tenements condemned as firetraps” (Zinn 382-383). In contrast, Schweikart and Zinn claim the economic deterioration was a myth and American industry
He states by having so many of them taking up the low-skilled working jobs in America they are actually creating an increase in wage inequality. He states that by decreasing the numbers of low-skilled workers in America that it would actually reduce the wage inequality and strengthen the wages for people in those
In 8 Surprising Facts About The Shrinking Middle Class From “Third World America” (PHOTOS)by Hallie Seegal 08/09/2010 01:19 PM ET states that in 2005, the bottom 20 percent of household earners had an average income of $10,655 while households in the top 20 percent made nearly 160,000 – a disparity of 1,500 percent, the highest gap ever recorded. Even some might refer to the U.S. as “ a land of opportunity ”,the reality is
Neoliberalism is the main cause of the difference between the rich and the poor in the states. It expanded the market efficiency by competitions between individuals, raised a gap between the rich and the poor. Rich people are becoming much richer based on their original properties while poor people are becoming poorer and suffer great economic problems in their lives. This does not only happen between individuals but also between companies. The unemployment rate increased because of neoliberalism.
In here belonging to a social class seems to be an obstacle for some individuals to obtain equal opportunity, unlike upper class people. Therefore, in a stratified society, the individual’s opportunities are always determined by his or her social class. In this essay, I will be arguing that even though mobility exists in the social class system, the opportunity to change status is relatively open for everyone but the distribution of opportunities among the members of a social class is not relatively equal to all. I will demonstrate this point by showing how participation of an individual in a specific social class will decide the opportunities in terms of attaining education and achieving a well-paid job. Education has a significant role in promoting social mobility; it enables people to acquire knowledge and certain skills in order to promote their social status.
The facts and numbers provided in any article shows how the justice system is more harsh on those of different color of white, or those of different race than an American, and it shows how that black community is in danger from a system that is supposed to detect us, because any crime they do, no matter how small it is, the punishment for it will be drastically different than that of a white man were to be tried for the same crime. An example of the issue involving inequality of the races can be seen in many other sources, for example where it is written, “Our judicial system is demonstrably, institutionally racist i the end result, and the end result-killing a
Along these lines, unemployment may decrease, as this has different favorable circumstances, for example, lower government using on profits and less social issues. However, this phenomenon includes a number of different expenses. Firstly, if economic growth is unsustainable and is higher than the long run pattern rate, inflations are liable to be seen. An increase in economic growth could prompt an equalization of issued installments. In case the expanded customer expenditure causes further development, there will be an increase in the import sector.