ipl-logo

Infamy And Responsibility In Nicholas II's Government

484 Words2 Pages

Upon his arrival to the throne, Nicholas II followed the food steps of his father, Alexander III. He intended to maintain spirit of autocracy regarding the political, social, and economic spheres. He believed that autocracy suited best to Russia. Any other political regime, in his view, could make the country vulnerable to a revolution. Nicholas thought of his role of an autocrat as being a guardian responsible only to God for his stewardship: “In the sight of my Maker I have to carry the burden of a terrible responsibility and at all times, therefore, be ready to render an account to Him of my actions. I must always keep firmly to my convictions and follow the dictates of my conscience”. Thus, Nicholas stated that an Emperor of Russia had to be autocrat and unlimited monarch, who answered and feared only God. …show more content…

The State Council consisted of experienced and respected members of nobility, who acted as bureaucrats and whose opinions and judgement the Tsar could accept or decline. Moreover, no one except noblemen and thei organizations could petition the Tsar, acting through their respective marshals, had capability of petitioning the Tsar. Basically, two classes of bearcats had the power: minister, who managed the various branches of the government, and the governors-general, governors, and perfects, who directed the chief geographical subdivisions of the empire. Elected district and provincial zemstvos and the elected municipal dumas acted unnatural parts prevailing political system. The former bore responsibilities over educational institutes and municipal aspects of provinces, while the latter administered similar services in cities. Though they had limited power and bureaucracy controlled them, yet their existence was a problem. Nicholas had labelled those initiatives “senseless

Show More
Related

  • Psycho-Japanese War Dbq

    698 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nicholas II was extremely strict when it came to his government and as a result forbade any form of democracy in Russia and imposed absolute autocracy on all the citizens. His domestic policy was so strict political parties were illegal to form and he even made the Okhrana, a secret police that arrested and imprisoned any political critics, rebels, or those who voiced a negative opinion against the Russian autocracy. As a result, the citizens, especially those of lower class, despised the government and would often attempt to revolt. However, since the revolts were unorganized and ineffective, Nicholas II was able to end them very swiftly. After the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War in 1905, Russia suffered extreme humiliation as well as economic decline.

    Read More

  • The Romanov Family: Standing For Imperial Russia

    309 Words  | 2 Pages

    Its was expected of him since his grandfather Ivan III made the Grand Duchy of Moscow into a dominant Russian state and was affecting the ruler of Russia. Ivan IV ruled from 1547-1584 when his mental capabilities stated to decline and affect his reign. Since his chosen heir dyed, Simeon Bekbulatovich was commander of main regiment of the Livonian war and appointed grand prince of all Russia. Later

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The Articles Of Confederation And Under The Constitution

    901 Words  | 4 Pages

    Federalism Compare state sovereignty under the Articles of Confederation and under the Constitution. States were sovereign under the Articles of the Confederation although they shared no power under the constitution. It is the states that were supreme under the Articles of Confederation that led to the creation of a government that had a weaker national government. The executive arm of the government was not independent, and there were no federal courts since the state courts enacted all the laws (Brest, p.58). Also, neither did the Congress have the taxing power nor did it have the power to control interstate or foreign commerce.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: A Hero Or Villain?

    266 Words  | 2 Pages

    Historians argue whether Alexander the Great is a hero or villain. I think that Alexander the Great was a hero for three reasons. Those three reason are that he civilized the cities he conquered, he believed that all people in the world should have one rule, and he gave many things to the people. Here are more details about those reason. The first reason he is a hero is that after he conquered cities he made them more civilized.

    Read More

  • Soviet Union Vs Russia Dbq

    694 Words  | 3 Pages

    (Background Essay) Before Vladimir Lenin came into power to rule Russia, Russia was ruled by Czar’s. A Czar was an emperor that the ruled Russia before 1917. The last Czar to rule Russia was Nicholas II. He was overthrown by Bolsheviks in the year of 1917.

    Read More

  • How Did Tsar Nicholas II's Impact On Russia

    716 Words  | 3 Pages

    Influenced mostly by Konstantin and his father, he became a strong believer in autocracy (system of government by one person with absolute power). Later on, when Nicholas II

    Read More

  • What Is The Difference Between The Virginia Plan And The Great Compromise

    456 Words  | 2 Pages

    A chief executive was elected by the legislature. The Upper House members were elected by the Lower House members. The members of The Lower House  were chosen by the people. Congress could collect taxes from states. Because of

    Read More

  • 1917 Revolution Dbq

    1224 Words  | 5 Pages

    Furthermore, Nicholas allowed his country to enter two wars, the Russo-Japanese war and WWI, Russia being ill-prepared for the wars both times. The battles did not go well in either of the wars and his actions dealt great suffering to the people of Russia, especially the minority, or lower class. Although his country was in peril and he knew it, he refused to implement reforms. Tsar Nicholas II truly wanted to aid his country although his inexperience did not allow him to do so. Hence, this led to the murder of his family and the end of 3 centuries of Romanov ruling when the Bolsheviks took power of Russia.

    Read More

  • 1917 Russian Revolution Dbq

    1271 Words  | 6 Pages

    With no signs of the czar’s attempt to solve the complications, Russia banded together and filled the streets with strikes and riots. A revolution was peaking among the peasants. The uprising brought Nicholas ll no choice but to abdicate his throne. This was an opportunity

    Read More

  • Edmund Davis Constitution Of 1876

    633 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Constitution of 1876 came from the result of the 1869 destruction Constitution. Edmund Davis a former union general, a Republican associated with the drastic faction of the party had governed under this Constitution. This Constitution had a reduced local government control giving the executive centralized power. What was believed to be a corrupt exorbitant administration led by Davis in everything you maintain this power and control of governor. Davis manipulated the Supreme Court to invalidate the new elected governor Richard Coke.

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay Of Alexander The Third Of Macedonia

    597 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander of Macedonia inherited the throne when he was only 20 years old. His father, Philip of Macedonia built the Macedonian army into a deadly machine. When Alexander was on the throne, he set out to conquer Persia, which was at that time, the most powerful kingdom. He, Alexander the Third of Macedonia should be called Alexander the Great is because he had a big influence on the world, had genius battle strategies, and because he was respectful.

    Read More

  • Unified Silla

    1389 Words  | 6 Pages

    Social and political structure Central government officials were divided into sixteen ranks, the six members of the top rank forming a type of cabinet, with the top official being elected every three years. The first to sixth rank were the officials I political affairs, and military commanders.. In the, the through the eleventh were officials may have head administrators . the twelfth to the sixteenth, may have been military administrators.

    Read More

  • Vladimir Lenin's Animal Farm And The Russian Revolution

    966 Words  | 4 Pages

    Similarly, Czar Nicholas II was an unfit ruler since he was never properly taught how to rule. Due to both of their inability to rule, it resulted in the animals and people being neglected and forgotten

    Read More

  • How Did Nicholas II Evaluate The Creation Of The Duma

    300 Words  | 2 Pages

    Prior to Alexander II was Nicholas II who unfortunately did not have a liking from citizens when he introduced his political policies. Nicholas’s creation of the Dumas proved highly unsuccessful as they opposed Nicholas’s ideas of an autocratic rule. After the pressure from the revolution 1905 Nicholas and Sergei Witte issued a manifesto about the creations of a Duma. On April 1906 Tsar Nicholas issued Fundamental Laws which made him ‘supreme autocrat’, this way no law could be made without the Dumas assent but the Duma could also not pass laws without the approval of the State-Council. The first Duma was very poor as it was largely made up of centrists and liberalists, as left-wing groups refused to join.

    Read More

  • Was The Russian Revolution Inevitable Essay

    716 Words  | 3 Pages

    THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION ___________________________ 1. How could the Russian Revolution have been avoided? What factors could have been changed that might have stemmed the call for revolution? Or, was the Russian Revolution inevitable? Why?

    Read More

More about Infamy And Responsibility In Nicholas II's Government

Open Document