Another problem was infanticide. Because of then stigma attached to single mothers, many women committed infanticide. These women were seen to be suffering from mental illness and were thus to be dealt with as a social and not a criminal problem. Consequently, many were consigned to Magdalen Asylums. This was codified in the Infanticide Act(1949).Infanticide occurred for a number of reasons. Often the women were in poverty. Many of the women were uneducated. Often they were ignorant of reproduction and childbirth and care. The women were held solely responsible for the death of the infant and the responsibility of the male or the wider society was sidestepped. By deeming the women temporarily insane, their political weight and identity …show more content…
This play deals in a more nuanced way with the nuns running these institutions. They are seen as confused and in some ways victims themselves. The play however does not condone the abuses perpetrated by the Magdalen Asylums. The play opens with the daughter of an inmate of a Magdalen Asylum visiting the asylum to gain information about her mother. She had been separated from her mother who was a single parent. The play shows a number of women penitents from 1963. These women were all in the asylum because they were victims of sexual abuse or single mothers. Thus the female victim of sexual abuse is punished by society rather than the male perpetrator. One of the women finds consolation in religion rather than face the ugly reality of the sexual abuse she suffered. Another considers that the convent protects her from men. One of the women is seen to dream of a colorful life outside and to idolize Elvis Presley. There is a strong element of fantasy about the existence of these women. They find emotional sustenance in the meager object like old photos which they find and in each other's companionship. They are treated as children by the nuns, their individuality and autonomy are curbed. Memories of
Much of the preservations in the play are for men who have even denied the women their privacy. Susan Glaspell shows women as weak and only able to do weak responsibilities such as housekeeping and staying at their
Although being written centuries apart, the limited expectations of women presented in ‘Othello’ and ‘A Streetcar Named Desire’ differ little from each other. The female characters are confined by society’s expectations of male dominance, female purity and virginity, and the many passive roles of women. Despite the differing legalities surrounding the position of women between the centuries in which the plays were written, both plays explore the impact of how societal conventions confine women and the ways they must comply to be safe in a patriarchal society. The behaviours and treatments of Desdemona, Blanche and Stella illustrate the attitudes enforced on and the behaviours of women throughout both periods in time and it is these attitudes and behaviours that impact the plays to the greatest extent. When characters in either plays defy their norms, or demonstrate a lack of compliance they induce negative consequences, such as the murder of Desdemona and the institutionalisation of Blanche.
It is a tragic modernist piece of literature that makes it hard for a self like Myrtle to take a subject’s seating position. Characters such as Daisy will always prove in the end that the seat belongs to
Thesis statement: This thesis is an exploration of the social, political and economic circumstances that hindered Baby’s
The novel by Kristin Hannah, The Nightingale, was truly a remarkable and unbeatable story depicting two women who have taken extremely opposite stands in regards to Nazis occupation in France. Throughout the storyline, Hannah was able to weave the ink on a page into wondrous and thrilling narrations from these two sisters. Indeed, one almost feels as if they were completely submerged in the mind’s of these dynamic characters. In a way, Vianne and Isabelle can be compared to the actions of the natural elements of fire and water. One goes with the flow, not really pushing against the current; while the other blazes against everything in its path, not stopping for anything, or anyone.
It reveals how people commit cruel acts out of selfish intentions. In this situation, the girls claim to “come to Heaven’s side” by pointing fingers at others for witchcraft, although they were only doing so to get themselves out of their own trouble. These acts of cruelty reflect upon the evil motives of the perpetrators that become more common after it is done once, as seen through the continuous trials and suspicions, which acts as one of the most major conflicts in the play. Without these cruel accusations, there would be neither plot nor ending. With this same situation, it can be concluded that accusations become more frequent during an interval of time when there are more people accusing.
Throughout the play, the characters look at faith, race, opportunities, fatherhood and
It shows whoever reads it why lying is a sin. A society or puritans, focused on perfection of religion, is shocked by an occurrence of witches. Witches are the Devil’s evildoers, and should be persecuted at once. Abigal, the drama queen of the play, attempts to kill the wife of the man she loves with witchcraft. They are found, but whenever Abigal and the others attending are being accused, they lie, blaming others of being witches.
The play “Trifles” by Susan Glaspell is largely based on stereotypes. The most prevalent one explores the difference between gender roles. Glaspell exerts the repression of women in the 1900s. During that time, women were highly looked down upon by men, and were only seen as the housekeepers and child bearers. This example is displayed throughout the play with the men, however, the women in this play prove that the stereotypes of gender roles held against them are completely wrong, which is shown through the characters, set design, and symbolism.
In comparison to the movie, the play undermines male dominance by focusing on women’s efforts to solve their own problems. First of all, there aren’t even men in the cast of the play,
The one-act play, “Trifles,” by Susan Glaspell, has several themes that are incorporated within it. There are several dominant ideas such as female identity, patriarchal dominance, isolation, and justice are themes that are all reflected in different ways throughout the play; however, gender is the main theme of “Trifles.” There is a considerable difference between the roles of the men and the women in this play. The men are expected to act in a more controlling, dominant way, while the women are expected to act in the typical ‘housekeeper’ fashion. The theme of gender is brought out through the play in many dramatic elements such as character, tone, and dramatic irony.
Women during this time were affected by the ideas of social Darwinist, they were believed to have “smaller brains”, they were belittled, they had no voice in politics. Some laws that were implemented were
Arguments for The play is considered by as a feminist work as it illustrates the erroneous treatment of women. Ibsen believes that women had a right to
The women treated the children with much tenderness and would share stories. The men in the family considered the actions of the women to be foolish, and a waste of time. The children typically came to their mothers for comfort; if the child was recently beaten by their abusive father, they would run to their mother for protection. The women cooked all of the husband 's meals and they did so without being ever being shown any gratitude. The women generally accepted the gender roles as fate, and choose to accept it since they would be beaten
The psychological impacts of a patriarchal society are seen throughout the production. Paulina is not only the victim of a crime, but also the victim of a society that has acted in a misogynistic way toward her. An interesting idea that Dorfman explores is whether this victimisation has served Paulina a significant disadvantage. Gender inequality seems prevalent throughout the play, particularly demonstrated through the relationship between Gerardo and Paulina. When Gerardo returns home in the first act, Paulina questions him regarding the truth commission leading to the revelation Gerardo has accepted a job that deals directly with the assault she faced without asking her beforehand.