Confucianism And Legalism

This leads into the ideas of the fourth primary source. As the Han dynasty became prudent, the officials had constructed a goal of enhancing the government by supporting the "Legalist" idea of an autocratic state. Ideologies of

Buddhism had an impact in both empires. However, Confucianism was the official ideology upon the entire Han Dynasty. Their values focused on a system of philosophical and “ethical-sociopolitical teachings”. Han China accented political control around the education of bureaucrats to make more logical decisions. Maurya India, on the other hand, was essentially a Hindu state.

For the flow of the world to work, it had to be balanced and the traditional Chinese religion focused their beliefs on yin and yang to bring that about. The “good” and “evil” is what yin and yang is about, however, the correct way is when things are working together is what brings balance, and that is why it is a common misconception for yin and

Legalism was also well-known as the greatest rival towards the Confucian school of thought. The primary ideas of legalism was to govern a country through the basis of punishment and reward so as to preserve and strengthen the state. Its main purpose served to redesign the governing institutions to reflect the realities of the socioeconomic and political transformations of the late spring and autumn period and the warring states period. This ideology was then adopted by Qin Shi Huang of the Qin Dynasty to rule, punishments were harsh, those who did not follow the law were sentenced to death while those who contributed significantly to the government was rewarded generously. Under these strict rules was how the Qin was able to unify China and standardise the language used.

At that time, there were hymns and rituals for worshipping Buddha Amitabha. Pictures of Buddha Amitabha and the Pure Land were created as well. (Andrews 1991, 185) Shandao made the Pure Land doctrines and practices more systematic. 2.5 Development after Tang Dynasty In Tang Dynasty, the spread of Pure Land Buddhism was affected by political environment.

By combining two aspects of tradition and being able to let them work with each other, national strength will begin to increase again which will restore nationalism and the confidence of

The Main Features of the Legalist School of Thought Legalism is a school of thought in classical Chinese whose main pillar is societal order. It holds that order in society is more important than any other human interest. Adherents of the doctrine believed that rulers should abandon the ideals of humanity and tradition to achieve a systematic government. They held that education and ethics teachings could not be used to improve people’s lives. Their vision of an ideal government was one that was established on a rigorously formulated law and an enforcing authority that would ensure absolute adherence to the law.

The years of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty were a golden age for Chinese philosophy. Confucius lived during this era, teaching his ideals of duty to society, individual virtue, and tradition. Also in this period, a philosopher named Laozi founded Taoism, which emphasized passivity and social inaction to achieve individual peace. On the other hand, philosophers who advocated Legalism claimed that the state was much more important than the individual and that individuals had to conform completely to the decrees of their supreme rulers. Finally, Mohism was a philosophy that advocated equality for all people, as well as merit-based power and universal love.

Foreign aid was sent directly to the government to improve its physical structure, reduce poverty and maintain political stability, but the government took that foreign aid for its own benefit and reduced people's ability to depend on their government. This problem helped an individual who dominates the state and led to a dictatorship. The elimination of poverty has failed and foreign aid has become a tool for a dictator to develop his power and maintain power. According to discursive material theory, we can include all parts of these globalization-related structures, including multinationals, WTO policies, foreign aid, and the role of government in Cambodia, including the signal, the evidence and the

The scholars in favor of new culture movement, like Hu Shi,Advocates the new literature(bai hua wen), opposing the old literature (wen yan wen). Advocates simple writing instead of traditional writing, there are a lot of scholars have different opinion about new culture movement on Chinese culture. Some scholars think it is good for Chinese culture development, but some scholars think it ruin traditional culture. My research question is: Did New Culture Movement ruin Chinese traditional culture or not?

Due to China’s Warring Period after the Han Dynasty, Buddhism gained popularity because no imperial authority was around to enforce laws. Once an empire rose to power, Buddhism was turned against. Initially the Chinese defended Buddhism and its policies, but after centuries, others increasingly analyzed how Buddhism had not presence in older documents. Buddhism began to be blamed for the political and social problems of Chinese society. An additional document, such as a graph, that demonstrates actual numbers of Buddhist converts of this time period would help determine if the given documents’ author’s statements about Buddhism were accurate.

Han Yu cited Confucius in his rage to ridicule Buddhism as “a cult of barbarian peoples” (Doc #4). Han Yu’s position in the imperial court certainly suggests his ideas were an official state standard, though one would need additional evidence from Han Yu’s emperor’s response to Han Yu’s plea in order to know how much influence actually Han Yu held over official policy. Emperor Wu also called for Buddhism’s “eradication,” as the cause for “poisoning customs.” As Emperor, it is likely that Wu’s Edict carried a lot of weight, but it is also possible Wu was jealous of Buddhist monasteries “outshining [his own] imperial palace” than by true concern for his subjects’ welfare.

Some colonial gentleman even changed their religious beliefs to reflect European ideas that God only played an indirect affair with humans. Educated colonists were especially interested in the new ideas that showed the Age of Enlightenment what it really was. How did the Glorious Revolution affect colonial politics? • The dethroning of King James in England and at the end of the Dominion of New England showed all of the success of the representative government over dictatorship. Colonists came to see their legislatures as colonial alternatives of parliament on its own.

Laws are part of our Constitution and protect citizens. We have to take responsibility and accountability for choices in order to better our future. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the wrong direction for our nation because it took advantage of helpless Indians, unjustly removed them from their lands, and was the birth of true racism and discrimination among our citizens. To summarize, early Americans took advantage of the Indians and their lands which led to the beginning of racism and discrimination among citizens, and then laws were established to protect citizens against abuse of

In dystopian novels like Divergent and The Hunger Games, characters fought through severe governmental control and discrimination to take back their freedoms. The people of Kaivotopolis have come to a much simpler and less bloody solution to end their displeasure with the current United States of America. Rather than cause war and endanger thousands of lives, they have severed their ties with the US and have formed a new republic. Kaivotopolis is a meritocratic, innovation driven society that allows its citizens to have a major part in both government and education decisions. Its citizens believe this is a superior society compared to their current one because the leaders are implementing strategies used by the world 's top countries that have been proven the most effective.