Poor and informal settlement are two different things, poor means having a little money ([Def. 1]. (n.d.) In Merriam Webster Online retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/poor) and informal settlement means areas where groups of housing units have been constructed on land that the occupants have no legal claim to, or occupy illegally (Informal Settlements. (2001, September 25) retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=1351). It means that the level of the informal settlers or the squatters is lower than the poor because squatters does not have their own property. If the informal settlers are located to another place it means that the government gave the informal settlers a house, and nothing more. The people still needs to work and use the skills that they have to survive and to have the basic needs of life aside from shelter like food, water and clothes. The problem to the people is that the people are just relying to the government and not making a move. But the government have a lot of ideas to solve this kind of problems but are not implemented that easily. After the relocation program the informal settlers should know what are the skills that they have so the informal settlers will excel on the work and be motivated and to earn more for all the basic needs that everyone in the family needs because a person will not work on a job when that person does not have a skill on that particular job. The informal settlers should enhance the
These resources made it difficult for settlers to live Charles
This pushed the natives back further and further until they were now a small minority with little to no room for
In our textbook, Experiencing History, the settlers are portrayed as people whom, “established most of their settlements with an eye to stability and order” (page 89). However, in Changes in the Land,
In the article it states that 10% of the cherokee Indians only moved to the new Indian territory. This means that the cherokee doesn’t wanna move due to their past problems, the cherokee possibly doesn’t want to move due to the fact that their land was carved into something they love, the cherokee may not want to move. Also, the supreme court even says “...Indian Territory shows how little support the treaty has.” , this obviously means that the Cherokee doesn’t want to move at all. More the reason why they shouldn’t move.
Niles Auerbach #10434860 History 7a online TAKE HOME OPEN BOOK ESSAY QUESTION 1: How were the southeastern tribes affected by the removal/relocation And did we as a nation even care?
The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the
During and after the war, many Native Americans homes got destroyed so they had to move.
There is evidence that the Cherokee 's land was rich in gold. The land was very valuable so relocating the Native Americans would
Throughout the 1830s more than 100,000 Indigenous persons were forcefully moved to
The refugees only received occupation licenses, which allowed them to stay on their own land, but they, technically, weren’t entitled to anything. The land the refugees were left with was extremely poor quality which made farming very hard. In light of the unfortunate conditions, the Black Refugees developed their own African Baptist churches, schools and some of their families joined with previously existing communities of “Black Canadians” to create a popular culture and “mutually supportive community infrastructure which endures to this day.” (Tubman "The Black Refugees of the War of 1812") The slave owners, of course, were angered by the loss of what they felt were rightfully theirs and what they thought of as their “property,” so sent delegations to the British demanding that the immediate return of their slaves. While serving in the war, one of the main fears of the blacks was that the invading Americans would force them to return back to
In the letter, the Cherokee nation addresses several reason on why they should not have to move. One reason is that the new land if foreign to them. They are being expected to pack up, leave everything they know, and move to the unknown. Another reason to add on to the above is that there are other Native American tribe already
(Schultz, 339)They did this by establishing "Settlement Houses".(Schultz, 2014, p 337). These houses were used to help reform institutions. Policymakers started making a lot of changes to the state level of talking about a movement to
The Indian Removal Act forced the Native Americans to move away from their ancestral homes. Gabrielle Tayac, Edwin Schupman, and Genevieve Simermeyer noted, “Native peoples have created thriving societies along the shores of numerous rivers that feed into the beautiful and environmentally rich Chesapeake Bay. They lived in connection to the seasons and the natural resources of the region” (“Chesapeake Natives: Three Major Chiefdoms”). Prior to the arrival of the colonists, the Native Americans built and maintained successful communities in their ancestral homes for generations.
People are overcrowded in these households and only earn social security, veteran or disability’s income. The reservations do not have industrial employers and most of the employers include federal and tribal governments. The condition has resulted to high level of unemployment, which does not only affect individuals but the entire society. The employment problems are driving many Native American families into a state of poverty which has forced some to become homeless. Housing is another factor causing poverty in the Native American Reservations.
In moving migrants must not only see a lack of benefits at