Many people believe that the death penalty is not justifiable, but does not justice mandate that criminals receive what they deserve? The punishment must fit the crime. If a burglar deserves imprisonment, then a murderer deserves death. The death penalty as harsh as it
Anyways the prison population should had lower by now. Is the death penalty doing an effective job deterring people from committing crime? Also there have been some studies to find out if death penalty really deters people from committing crime. In the article “Deterrence and the death penalty. Why the statistics should be ignored”, Daniel Nagin discusses how many statistics showing that death penalty works as a deterrence disregard many important aspects in how to calculate
In conclusion, I would like to add that we are all humans and we should be treated that way. Death penalty is like the ‘’tooth for a tooth – eye for an eye’’ theory. Instead of acting inhuman to our fellow beings we should find a better way to solve the mind of criminals. Making the problem vanish is not a good idea. We should do psychological researching instead!
Not only has the death penalty proven to be constitutional, cost effective, ethically correct deterrent of future murders, but it also is a punishment that fits the crime. First of all, the abolitionists argue that the death penalty is actually illegal or unconstitutional (Eckholm & Schwartz, 2014) because it violates the 8th Amendment’s ban against cruel and unusual punishments. But in fact, the Constitution sanctions the death penalty in several contexts. The 5th Amendment states that “no one shall deprive you of your life, unless you are properly judged and convicted in a due process of law” (Cornell University, n.d). This means that the State actually has the right to put you up for capital punishment after you have been properly sent to trial.
Do you know that the American government spends $ 181 billion annually on drugs? I am going to discuss drug addiction in the U.S. There are 20.4 million addicts which represents 8% of the population. Different factors influence them to take drugs, like poverty, family separation, and anxiety. Family separation has the highest rate of 33%.
According to researchers the death penalty would be very benificial to us as a society. For example the death penalty acts as a deterrent, the constitution also allows the death penalty, and the death penalty can promote happiness and well being to non offenders. So with the death penalty it could save many lifes. When a criminal gets away with murder or rape it gives them a chance to assault a second victim or even a third. Us living in a america, were born to live a good life, if we have twisted people who want to try to corrupt and kill why should we allow that?
A Successful Drug Addiction Counselor When a person makes that decision to become a Drug Addiction Counselor, they must know how to be supportive, have the required education and experience, and definitely, most importantly, be non-judgmental. Some even find that being a recovering addict themselves, makes for a better counselor. As a drug addiction counselor, the work environment may be in a private office setting, a doctor office, a rehabilitation facility or even in jail. The whole concept behind drug addiction counseling is to offer tools to help those addicted recover and maintain a sober and healthy lifestyle. Support from a drug addiction counselor can come in various forms.
Thinking about how disordered this world is, death penalty is a good solution to solve crimes related to murder and sexual offence, which are soiling this world. If it is such a good solution, why not used it earlier? Death penalty has been a controversy, because of the fact that it violates criminals’ rights. However, if we think about it backwards, they cannot judge that it violates human rights; it is them who first violated innocent people’s rights. Besides, there are other reasons to support my idea, and furthermore persuade you.
The aim of punishing criminals is to teach, make them understand they made a mistake and took lessons from this mistake and did not repeat this mistake the rest of their life. However, Capital Punishment takes this chance from criminals hand and does not give opportunity for them to understand their mistake because killing someone by murder after they have murdered does not teach them a lesson. Criminals can not be taught by the same mistake. Also, capital punishment does not work as a punishment it works as a vengeance method in these law enforcements. And in the 21st century taking someone’s life for justice is shameful for all humanity.
The death penalty will be looked at in terms of its benefits and its drawbacks. The death penalty is the execution of criminals who have committed heinous crimes, such as murder. We are determining whether criminals should be punished with the same crime they have committed or whether they should live on. Should we execute criminals in order for justice to be served or should we let them live harder lives in prison? Are we being hypocritical when we execute criminals or are we taking retribution for the victim of the murder?