Informative Speech: The Importance Of Using Sun Protection

Don’t worry if have no clue because this post will cover tanning tablets in details to help understand what to expect in the course of using them. What are tanning tablets? Every person knows the damaging effects of the ultraviolet ray of the sun from fine lines to wrinkles and skin cancer, which is the most common cancer in the United States. Subsequently, it is essential to use tanning tablets so as have a golden glowing skin without exposing your body to the

One million people in the U.S are diagnosed each year with some types of skin cancer. There are three major types of skin cancer, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and of course melanoma. Most people are more familiar with melanoma and because it is the least common they continue to think they won’t get cancer. The majority of skin cancer cases are basal cell carcinomas and squamous cells carcinomas. They are malignant meaning they will not spread to other parts of the body, and are usually able to be easily removed.

Logos appeared when the advertisement listed the six ways to be protected from the sun. The six rules state that you should wear a hat, wear sunglasses, wear long clothing, apply sunscreen, seek shade, and limit exposure. Ethos only really appeared at the very end of the advertisement when the David Cornfield Melanoma Fund logo comes up, and one would only know the credibility of this organization by looking up the fund itself. In conclusion, this advertisement shows how important sun protection knowledge really is. Even at a young age, knowing that melanoma is very easy to get may cause the rates of this deadly cancer to drop.

The effects of indoor tanning General Purpose: To persuade Specific Purpose: To persuade the audience not to use indoor tanning beds. Thesis Statement: Organizational Pattern: problem-cause solution Introduction Attention Getter: There is an unexplained increase in skin cancer among people under the age of forty. 30 million people visit an indoor facility each year according to the indoor tanning association. That is 10 percent of the U.S. population voluntarily exposing themselves to UV radiation which causes cancer. UV radiation is a form of energy from natural and artificial sunlight.

These rays absorb into the skin and can lead to a cancer called melanoma. According to Alexandra Sifferlin, “The FDA reports that people who are exposed to radiation from indoor tanning are 59% more likely to develop melanoma compared to people who have never used indoor tanning before.” Because of this kind of radiation, using indoor tanning increases the rate of cancer by over 50%. Whenever people get melanoma by exposing themselves to these rays, it starts in one place and can spread to many different parts of the body. Whenever it spreads, it starts to become fatal because the whole body is affected with the disease. “This type of cancer kills an estimated 10,130 people in the US just annually.” When people absorb the rays, their skin becomes darker.

The Dangers of Tanning “Today, more than 3.5 million skin cancers are diagnosed each year in the United States. That’s more than all other cancers combined” says Stacy Simon form cancer.org. In the article “Indoor tanning” it says that there is a “higher melanoma rates among young females compared to young males.” The reason young females have a higher rate of melanoma is because of females indoor tanning. Indoor tanning is potentially dangerous and has been the cause of many deaths. “But my tanning salon says that there is absolutely no possibility of me getting cancer because they use safe tanning rays,” one might complain.

And why do they have to ban just opioids when many other common drugs could have the same drug effects on people? To answer the first question, I would say the government has looked through this whole thing and just want to get rid of the opioids for the sake of them looking good. It was just all about getting rid of them to decrease the amount of opioid abuse and just giving the people who really need it other alternatives that look like they work because the alternatives they give are un-called for like a massage and therapy every day (seemingly impossible to do with the problem of having to go to work). To answer the second question, I believe they would say that opioids have the strongest effect on people other than all the other prescription drugs out

Larzelere uses research that has been conducted so far just proves the fact that the child was spanked as punishment and not whether the parent did it appropriately. He compares this to radiation treatments being given, ignoring dosage, and types of cancer. Cancer is obviously a topic that can pull almost any bodies heart strings. Another example he uses is the fact that many people who do not support spanking say that spanking causes the child to be more aggressive. He states that this may be true, but it could happen with any disciplinary action saying “people who received radiation treatment last year are more likely to have cancer-related problems this year than all of us who did not need radiation treatments last year”.

It turned out to be stage 1B Melanoma (Leonard). Is the tan really worth it? Having to spend hours at doctors appointments to get rid of the cancer. Researchers estimate that indoor tanning may cause upwards of 400,000 cases of skin cancer in the U.S. each year ("Indoor Tanning Industry Under Scrutiny”). Some of these cases lead to Melanoma which is the most dangerous type of skin cancer that exists.

We can think of countless bits of knowledge we take for granted but that are derived from experience and for which we cannot hold a solid argument without recourse to perception for example. When we stand in the sun, we sweat. Children develop teeth in their first few years. The threshold of human hearing is 20 000 Hz. Had we not felt ourselves sweat every time we stood under the sun for a considerable amount of time, seen children’s teeth bud every time one of them hit a certain age, and repeatedly heard tones only below 20 000 Hz in experimental manipulations, we would not have come to the above conclusions.