Essay #1
Initiative Process
The initiative process for the state of California has positive aspects as well as its less favorable aspects. The process originates from an issue that triggers a need for a huge change in the lives of many people. The development is a quick process; however, it narrows down to the energy of getting valid petition signatures for a single issue. A strong will of determination from the idea holder and a nice portion of funds as to how they intend to construct the material in such a way to get the initiative in motion to become successful whether it is for or against something.
There are countless well-thought-of reasons for pushing an initiative. There is an all-out concern with the citizens’ impression that the separation
…show more content…
The initiative process concern surfaced as a problem the minute the first Constitution came about they referred to it as the classicist method of “direct democracy” (Korey, 2009). This occurs when the people designate what measures and concerns are pertinent to their lives and not the politicians in which they voted in the political position. A great reason why we need the education of the politicians is when the woman whom had “the garden of angel” which contain dead abandon babies need assistance to elevate this horrific matters She spoke to her effective legislature at that time, who was Jim Brulte with the knowledge and resources put together a program to resolve this concern and it became the Safe Haven Law (Rasky, 2009). Because of the “republic” the legislature must represent their members whom they serve or a better way of saying they are employed by the people to work for the people. Even if the issue does not sit well with the representative there should be no predispositions from the politicians. If biases surface, then connect the matters to someone who can assist. The woman knew that this small issue she once had control over had a rippling consequence. Therefore, she relinquished the information to the politician who is positioned to handle the citizens’ matters. This form of direct democracy does not require any background in politics or policies. So the goal is to get things done in a timely manner especially if they had other political position in mind. Even though the ideas are a great issue at the time, the lasting effect has not been measured. The financial donation is unlimited when dealing with initiatives and propositions. This is where the fine print comes to play and the average person is not educated in depth of the backers who push the issues financially. The sponsors have other things that descent into the passing or defeating of an issue (Korey,
“While the power is vested in the people, it is exercised by electing representatives.” Vivian Paige: Time to increase representation. Vivian is saying that although
The effect of government delegation in a republic is that the views of the public are “refined and enlarged” to a certain extent by being passed through the citizens whom they elected to govern them. This causes the voice of the public to become more concerned with the public good rather than if the people were ruling themselves as is done in a democracy. However, this action can also backfire if people are elected who do not have the best interest of the people as their first priority and corrupt the system by “betraying the interests of the people” they are representing.
They used their money to get politicians on their side. At one point they even used their money to get a precedent in to office that greatly benefited
Supporters of a little gathering are liable to be spoken to by no less than one individual from parliament established in their locale and sharing their political perspectives and
Those dealing with mental illnesses are three to six times as likely as the general population to wind up in jail, and county leaders are embracing a national initiative to keep them out of jail and receive the treatment they need. Judy Wortham Wood and Robert Smedley, executive director and deputy director, respectively, of the Mental Health & Recovery Board of Wayne & Holmes Counties, spoke about the Stepping Up Initiative with the Wayne County commissioners Monday. They were joined by Capt. James Richards, who oversees the Wayne County Jail.
In each event the support and opposition to the initiative made thorough points for and against the initiative. The 2 weeks of the course that focused on the issue, and subsequent readings, help to give an insight into the
The events of the American Revolution affirmed the colonists’ anxieties over an inordinately centralized government that infringed on their natural rights and autonomy. Such rights were inalienable since they belonged to each individual on account of the laws of nature, and could not be taken away without consent. After the Revolution, the colonists adopted the Articles of Confederation to grant the states considerable sovereignty. Unfortunately, the Articles precipitated a new set of problems in creating a weak federal government with a limited role in enforcing the law and maintaining unity between the states. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 addressed these and other issues by establishing a new government that asserted the Constitution
Carrie Chapman Catt uses a lot of ideas about democracy in her speech that was logical. Catt uses logic to appeal to her audience from the first reason of women suffrage inevitability to the end of the speech. Catt uses the Declaration of independence, which turn out to be the basic rule of government (Catt, 1917). This is because it states that all men (women) are created equal and Catt used that along with the quote from Woodrow Wilson that states “we are fighting for the things which we have always carried nearest to our hearts: for democracy, for the right of those who submit to authority to have a voice in their own government” (Catt, 1917). The logic in Wilson’s quote as it relates to women’s suffrage is if democracy is the right of those who submit to authority to have a voice in their own government than why do women not allow to vote because they too submit to authority as men do.
Anna Howard Shaw uses a serious and persuasive tone in her speech to present her central idea that all citizens; men and women alike, should have the right to vote. Shaw believes that it is not fair to say that New York is a republic and not follow through with it completely. In the text Shaw says, “Now one of two things is true: either a Republic is a desirable form of government, or else it is not. If it is, then we should have it, if it is not then we ought not to pretend that we have it.” This statements shows that Shaw I very serious about the rights that a republican should have.
Nowadays our world is changing hourly – its political, social and economic global picture depends on the decisions (more or less important, but still important), which are taken every minute. Sometimes it seems that all significant events have taken place, moreover it was a long time ago. At the same time we forget that there are areas of life, our daily lives, which have been completely different recently. In modern Western societies the right to receive education and to vote for women is natural part of life, contrast to the Third world counties, where women still do not have opportunity to take part in decision-making and influence various spheres of life in their countries. Skeptics may wonder: “What is so special about the fact that women are allowed to vote?”
Limiting independent expenditures is circumscribing the money spent by individuals and groups such as 527s – types of U.S. tax-exempt organizations organized under Section 527 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code – and super PACs – types of independent political action committees which may raise unlimited sums of money from corporations, unions, and individuals, but are not permitted to contribute to or coordinate directly with parties or candidates – for candidates and parties that the individuals and groups are not directly affiliated with. Proponents have several viable arguments in favor of the proposal. One of the cogent
Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.
In the United States, people always talk about freedom and equality. Especially they want elections could be more democratic. In American Democracy in Peril, Hudson’s main argument regarding chapter five “Election Without the People’s Voice,” is if elections want to be democratic, they must meet three essential criteria, which are to provide equal representation of all citizens, to be mechanisms for deliberation about public policy issues, and to control what government does. Unfortunately, those points that Hudson mentions are what American elections do not have. American elections do not provide equal representation to everyone in the country.
Parliamentarism, or a parliamentary government, is defined “as a system of government in which the executive, the government, is chosen by and is responsible to…the legislature.” (Gerring, Thacker and Moreno, 2005, p. 15) With this form of governmental control, many advantages and disadvantages arise, especially when this system is compared to the likes of ‘Presidential systems’ or even that of ‘Semi-presidential systems’. However, my aim within this essay is to, both, highlight to advantages of parliamentarism, and to also give my opinion as to why this system is better when compared and contrasted with the aforementioned systems. According to Hague and Harrop (2007, p. 336), there are three different branches relating to the parliamentary system. Firstly, the legislature and the executive are “originally linked”.