Integration Theory Of Assimilation

775 Words4 Pages
Throughout history, migrants had to meet a specific standard of living, particularly satisfying the means of society, in this case, assimilation. However, throughout time, assimilation developed numerous critiques which allowed integration to overtake this basis. Assimilation, according to the straight line classic assimilation theory, is the ongoing fact that individuals need to assimilate into the receiving country to a core culture of white Anglo Protestant, which will allow them for uncomplicated movement. Under these circumstances, assimilation is unidirectional. On the other hand, integration states that assimilation is not necessary for manageable movement in the receiving country. For instance, integration states that it is not necessary to leave one’s culture behind to pursue success. Integration, compared to assimilation, is multidimensional in nature. It allows for immigrant groups to establish relationships with host societies in a much broader sense, for instance, either social culturally, or socially economically. Straight line classic assimilation states that over time immigrant groups resemble native individuals in terms of language, beliefs, values, and customs (Notes 1/29). In this theory, it describes how assimilation is inevitable at that immigrant groups are the only group to experience change, hence unidirectional. In this specific theory, I believe that positive aspect would have to be the consideration of change taking place over the course of

More about Integration Theory Of Assimilation

Open Document