Although the natives lead different lives than the stereotypical Christian American citizen, it does not give the United States government the right to strip them of their homeland and resources. The aborigines have a vast set of lore that many of are unaware of. It is wrong of Jackson to assume that one must be Christian in order to be civilized. Jackson claims that the natives, upon settling westward, will have access to countless benefits provided by the government. However, disregarding the natives’ religion, culture, and way of life does exactly the opposite.
Mr Deloria warns us against thinking that no government sovereignty have no limitations. He also discusses about the notion of defining cultural sovereignty from a cultural construction because it leads us to conclude that, " sovereignty for Indians is conditional upon cultural distinctiveness, in which way no other sovereignty is." Also, Dennis Kanahele critiques about the domestic dependent nation model of sovereignty, stating that it claimed to restore the Hawaiian nation. Therefore, he suggests us to integrate the perspectives of the Native, colonializing and the international community for a better understanding of what cultural sovereignty really meant. In addition, Professor Porter critiques how a distinct Indigenous ideas of Indigenous nation sovereignty may be revitalized?
In comprehensive yet less elongated words, to reverberate universal approach, there are cultures which apply all laws equally to their people. United States is one of the pioneer examples.Nevertheless, some people under the same umbrella of cultural characteristics contradict and believe that the same laws or policies cannot be applied to everyone under all conditions. They might have the tendency to take the rationale of the welfare of their social circle and make it a priority over law. The more prevailing example of it is the recruitment of friends and relatives in some cultures comprising of India, Pakistan etc. where competencies relevant to the job offered is neglected.Invalid source
Societies in America today do not imply the Golden rule to their everyday lives. This rule explains the karma effect that whatever you do comes back around to either break or make you. This applies to every aspect of life. The main aspects are showing compassion, building relationships due to loyalty, and overall respecting others. These crucial characteristics allow for a better way of life and to overall become better human beings socially while being religiously by obeying one out of the ten commandments.
The French colonial masters made them to work and think like French men. However, with the development of spirit of nationalism, and the laws on human rights, seeking a rise in confidence and cultural dignity of minorities, the policy of assimilation was banned. Then, leading to what is now called integration today. Farley (1982) argues, “There is no doubt that the dominant norm in the United States through nearly all our history has been cultural assimilation. That is, the prevailing cultural group in the United States has been the so-called WASPs: White Anglo Saxon Protestants.
In universal societies, a diversity of cultures, attitudes and beliefs from a variety of indigenous backgrounds become coherent within the community which produces an unbiased system without elite authority. Pluralism may be viewed as a quintessential outlook of state where everyone is equal. Pluralism is the preferred theory by individuals due to the fact that it provides ambition for political and social equality which different opinions are heard due to the impartiality and miscellaneousness within the group. Throughout the years, Britain, along with other countries, have developed a number of cultures in our country, welcoming and incorporated them into their own. Pluralism presumes multiculturalism within Britain and the other countries which highlights the significance of social diversity and the embracement of different cultures and normalities in order to maintain
Thomas and Kaufman (1988:37) have defined borrowing as ‘the incorporation of features into a group’s native language by speakers of that language; the native language is maintained but is changed by the addition of the incorporated features’. Einar Haugen (1950) defines borrowing as, “the borrowing takes place without the lender’s consent or even awareness, and the borrowing is under no obligation to repay the loan. One might as well call it stealing, were it not that the owner is deprived of nothing and feels no usage to recover his goods. The process might be called an adaptation, for the speaker does adopt elements from a second language into his own”. In a journey of a language, ‘words’ usually migrate from a place to another with cultures, the users of language(s).
(one group imposes its culture to the other); integration (the two firms are integrated structurally, but less so culturally and neither tries to dominate the other, which can happen without conflicts only if the acquire accepts to allow such autonomy); separation (the acquired group refuses to adopt the other firm’s culture altogether, and each will function independently if the acquire allows it); and deculturation (members of the merging firms are unwilling to adopt the other culture, which leads either to confusion or to the creation of a new shared culture). The authors suggest that the integration strategy adopted by each firm should be compatible. The chosen mode of integration will depend on the companies’ willingness to preserve their own culture, and on their perception of the other culture’s attractiveness. Therefore, the negative impact of cultural differences can be mitigated depending on the relative attractiveness of the new culture and by the chosen form of integration, as these will determine the level of interactions and conflicts between the companies. This theory received mixed empirical support, as some scholars backed it with evidence (Very et al., 1997; Morosini et al., 1998) while others determined that the link between cultural differences and performance is independent from the
While as the West drifted from the others, the rest still retained the more interdependent notion of the self. Although, it cannot be put aside that over the years, the remaining nations came to see the purpose of what the Westerners early on realize, so much so that they started to practice being self-reliant, which emphasizes the cultural value of individualism. According to Alan Roland (1988), a cross-cultural psychologist, all individuals possess three universal aspects of identity, and that is the individualized, familial, and spiritual identity. Although these aspects are present in all individuals, it does not necessarily mean that every person sees one individual the same as the individual perceive his or her self. Individuals, through communication with others, implement different identities depending on the perception of an individual to the others.