In the novella, Leaving Gilead, Pat Carr shows how war destroys people 's character. Integrity is extremely hard to find during war. Geneva is bossy and wants the best for herself and not for the more important things in life. Yankees are destroying reputation and lively hood. War brings out the worst in people. When the war started all human integrity had lost its purpose. Impatient Geneva was, she could not hold it anymore that no men were around. "Well Ian Birdsong, you kept insisting we leave. And so now we are" (Carr 101). Staying loyal is a had thing for Geneva, she can never be content. Ian wanted Geneva to go to her aunt in Tyler Texas, but instead Geneva wanted more men around so she headed up to Arkadelphia to be with the soldiers. "We 're too far away to tell who it is. Maybe it 's Naomi Pate. Maybe it isn 't" (Carr 117). Geneva knew exactly who it was but she didn 't want to take on another role of helping out. Being nice was not an option for Geneva. …show more content…
Men do not do purposeful things. "They burned the college? And that big church with them stain-glass windows" (Carr 115). What is the purpose of burning the buildings? As if the burning of the buildings helped the war. There is no virtue in the chaos of war. Men die in war and some men never want to see a guy left out there in the battle field. "That boy is alive. We are gonna send somebody to find him. And we are gonna get him the hell out of there" (saving private Ryan). The general was trying to keep as much of his men alive. War never is a good thing it tears relationships and bonds between
When Charley joined the First Minnesota Volunteers he along with many others wanted to help support his country during war. Everyone from the Union and the Confederacy thought that the war would be over soon but sadly they were wrong. The war that Charley had just joined would be bloodiest American war yet. Charley found out in this book that war changes people and that it is often not what people make it out to be.
This finding brings the point that civilian morale is important to the outcome of the war. Both nations tried to keep the civilian morale high, to keep up with production and to
He didn’t want to have the guilt of one of his soldiers dying on his watch. He didn’t want anything to do with the war. Yet there he was, leading his soldiers through attack after attack. One can only assume that it can be difficult watching your friend die and knowing you could’ve stopped it.
Ultimately, the companionship made at war is an important reason why soldiers miss war. Junger voices that a “connection to the other man he was with” is something that helps a soldier continue day by day. Talking. Eating. Playing.
For example colonel Read said,” Be brave and help your mother bear up she needs somebody now” (Collier and Collier 200). This shows that you get torn apart and depressed during war. The authors Collier and Collier's viewpoint on war is futile. One way the authors argue against war is the Meeker family is torn apart. The Meekers go through hard times as the book progresses.
They didn’t know what to expect from fighting in the war, other than death. As said by Tim O’Brien, “[I felt] sorry for myself, thinking about the war and the pig factory and how my life seemed to be collapsing toward slaughter. I felt paralyzed” (41). Most of these men were trapped in a war they had not intention in fighting in, one that could alter their future.
In order to make it through the war, “Robbie, quite naturally placed his faith in his relationship with Cecilia” her words “I’ll wait for you” and the memory of when she had said it” was what kept him motivated (Pastoor 213). The quote demonstrated that Cecilia’s commitment to being there for Robbie had kept him in a positive state of mind and motivated. This encouraged him to strive and continue to stay brave in order to be with Cecilia
Although the soldier he killed was an enemy soldier, instead of vilifying him he was able to humanize the man. O’Brien was able to describe the physical appearance of the soldier and imagine her life before war. The author was able to portray an emotional connection and made the line between friend and enemy almost vanish. This was able to reveal the natural beauty of shared humanity even in the context of war’s horror. O’Brien is able to find the beauty in the midst of this tragic and horrible event.
Because of her mindset, Geneva is unable to deal with reality. While they travel, it is evident that Geneva can not accept real life
People lost family and hope. After seeing the consequences of war, they now feared it. Many people were
And that is why I swore never to be silent when ever and where ever human beings endure suffering and humiliation.” The Allied Forces knew what was going on in all the camps, and they didn’t do anything to try to help. If they would have stood up and said something then maybe millions of people wouldn’t have died. He don’t want anyone to ever suffer the way he did and the way people did around him. Standing up for something could change many lives and help others.
Where is she? She is in the line of her duty. But where is the other? Gone where I wish she were not. The sheep of the good shepherd will follow the voice they know, but they will not follow the voice of a stranger.”
I shouldn't have married him"' (Carr 142). Throughout her married life, Geneva distracted herself with the facade of parties and emotional disconnection to her daughter because, at the thought of her mistakes, her brain couldn't handle it. Geneva was only able to accept reality on her death bed. The inability to accept reality is different for every human; some are able to use that as motivation to live a joyful life, while others go on with
and I took away some thoughts but I still come back to my original choice. I’m an “old-school” Soldier and believe that there isn’t anything more important than a Soldier with good character. I can trust that a Soldier of good character will conduct himself or herself
During deployments, soldiers may sometimes have to make split-second decisions that could have catastrophic consequences; moreover, the stress from being in the harshest environments for months on end can compel otherwise honorable service members to commit egregious acts. For instance, consider the untenable circumstances in which Navy SEAL Marcus Luttrell found himself and his team in June 2005. This elite group of American fighters drew upon their internal sets of values when confronting the ethical dilemma of whether or not to execute a band of goat herders who had stumbled upon the Americans. The outcome of that dilemma relied heavily on each individual’s level of self-awareness, resilience, and concept of ethics when it came to interpreting the Rules of Engagement (ROE). The consensus was to allow the goat herders to live; very shortly thereafter, the group of Americans became engaged in a fierce gun battle from which only Luttrell survived.