Darwin’s theory of evolution (Darwinism) Charles Darwin was an English naturalist. In the 19th century, he travelled around the world to discover the variations in plants and animal. Darwin became the foundation of modern evolutionary studies with his theory of evolution by “natural selection”. He explained his ideas on evolution in a book called, “On the Origin of Species”, released in 1859. Darwin’s ideas harvested a lot of controversy, and even today, as it conflicts with religious views about the creation of the world and the living beings in it.
Ideas supported by research are carried forward. Sometimes an element of an idea is unfathomable so it is recast. A theory by Charles Robert Darwin, a geologist and biologist, called “the theory of natural selection” puts to rest all questions about evolution of life and the happenstances around it. It states that a collection of similar individuals that can breed with each other are called species. Evolution, according to Darwin is a “slow and gradual, and endless” process.
Mindell tells us that “proponents of intelligent design claim that some features of life are too complicated to have evolved naturally. Although they emphasize that the designer is not necessarily God, proponents uniformly believe that God is the designer…” Mindell quotes law professor, Phillip Johnson, a proponent of intelligent design and author of Darwin on Trial: “Our strategy has been to change the subject a bit so that we can get the issue of intelligent design, which really means the reality of God, before the academic world and into the schools.” “Intelligent design proponents clearly believe that God is an active participant in creation, though they are divided as to whether this activity takes the form of front-loading all outcomes at the Big Bang, episodic intervention of the progressive creationism form, or other, less well-articulated possibilities. Theistic evolution, however, is ruled out or at best viewed as an ill-advised accommodation.” Intelligent design can be seen as “faith” taking “fact” seriously by arguing that the complexity of origins cannot be adequately explained by evolutionists. Scott, however, says that “even if natural selection were unable to explain the construction of irreducibly complex structures, does this mean that we must now infer that intelligence is required to produce such structures? And David Sloan Wilson argues: “Nature has always and correctly been regarded as a cornucopia of function.
Darwin was known for trying his best to present his scientific ideas in a way that it did not offend any believer or even in some perspectives were compatible with God. But his theory has been manipulated by both supporters and opposes of his work. Many people from a religious perspective believe that Darwin's theory undermines the fundamental beliefs that they hold, almost as an attack to their values (Dennett, 1995). Darwin's theory is that humans have evolved over time from other organisms, this is almost a slap-in-the-face for one of Christianity's core beliefs. Which is that God made us in His image when He made Adam and Eve; this means that above any other creature on the planet humanity has a special relationship with God.
They realized that the evolution of animal and plant forms was similar to the development of an embryo into a fully develops organism, they just could not determine the connection. In the early 20th century, biologists were beginning to understand how variation occurred, addressing the missing link of Darwin’s theory. By the 1940s, though the structure of the gene was still unknown, scientists had introduced the idea of the gene into Darwinian Theory. Geneticists clearly saw how heritable material contributed to evolution. All this happened during the Nuclear Age, and as the humans explored the power of nuclear weapons and energy, organisms in the environment became exposed to radiation.
Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution i.e. “survival of the fittest” and the “process of natural selection“, was written in 1859 and was a theory based on the behaviour of animals. This theory was adapted by Herbert Spencer and resulted in the ideology that is known today as Social Darwinism. The latter is based on Darwin’s theory but instead of being based on animal behaviour it is applied to humans. It implied that certain races were superior to others because of their technological advancements.
Humanity 's complex consciousness is not seen elsewhere in nature. This is a major problem for evolutionists; as a result, they ignore it. In spite of evolution 's folly, it is the only hypothesis for the universe 's origin that can even hold a candle to creationism in terms of plausibility. Therefore,
According to Darwin, natural selection is the, “preservation of favourable variations and the rejection of injurious variations” (O 891-892) which allows the best traits to be passed on to further generations and the weakest traits to be weeded out. As natural selection is the encompassing selection of traits, Darwin begins to focus strictly on ordinary selection which is just the natural environment forcing an organism to adapt and change to best fit their natural environment. “leaf-eating insects green, and bark-feeders mottled-grey” are just a few aspects on how organisms fit to the environment they are presented with to survive and reproduce. Otherwise, without the adaptations to their changing environment, species would go extinct. Darwin emphasizes that through nature’s guiding hand, “the vigorous, the healthy, and the happy survive and multiply” (O Chapter 3).
This can be relate to Darwin’s theory too in which in natural populations, the genetic composition of a population 's gene pool may change over time. Before Darwin 's time, science knew that life evolved, since they saw the fossil and their resemblance to extant life. And many hypotheses had been proposed before Charles Darwin 's idea. Darwin identifying natural selection as the mechanism for
This idea is based on the fact that Scientists are quick to give credit to God in areas where scientists are not able to find answers. He is assigned to areas evolution cannot explain (10 Dangers of Theistic Evolution). This idea demonstrates that God is not exactly supreme and in some way evolves too. Another aspect of this idea of creation is in Adam and Eve. This theory follows the claims on the Bible, at least the ones pertaining to creation.