Interconnectedness in the Afterlife: A Comparative Exploration of Eastern Religious Traditions and Western Philosophical Dualism
In the vast landscape of human thought, beliefs about the afterlife have captivated and inspired diverse cultures and philosophical systems. The concept of life beyond death offers insights into the core values and aspirations of these various traditions. This paper delves into the intricate tapestry of the afterlife, specifically focusing on the contrasts and potential connections between Eastern religious traditions, such as Hinduism and Buddhism, and Western philosophical perspectives, as exemplified by dualism in the works of Descartes. By examining these differing viewpoints, I aim to shed light on the ways in
…show more content…
In Hinduism, the concept of the Atman and its identification with Brahman implies that the eternal self continues to exist even after the death of the physical body. This belief system posits that the soul undergoes a series of rebirths, as determined by the laws of Karma and Samsara, until it attains Moksha, the ultimate liberation from the cycle of birth and death. This process of reincarnation is viewed as an opportunity for the soul to progress spiritually, learn from past experiences, and ultimately realize its true nature as part of the divine cosmic consciousness. The Bhagavad Gita, a sacred Hindu text, offers insights into the nature of the self or soul and its connection to the afterlife. In this text, Lord Krishna explains to the warrior Arjuna that the Atman is eternal, indestructible, and beyond the reach of death. The physical body, however, is temporary and subject to birth, death, and rebirth. Lord Krishna advises Arjuna to recognize the immortality of the soul and to perform his duties without attachment to the results, thus transcending the cycle of Karma and Samsara. This understanding of the eternal Atman serves as a guiding principle for Hindus in their pursuit of spiritual growth and the …show more content…
Instead, Buddhism posits a continuous process of rebirth, known as Samsara, driven by the individual's actions and mental states. The afterlife in Buddhism is therefore not a continuation of an eternal soul, but rather a sequence of interconnected lives or existences, each influenced by the actions and intentions of previous lives. The self is considered a dynamic and ever-changing process, comprised of interdependent physical and mental constituents known as the Five Aggregates (Skandha): form, feeling, perception, mental formations, and consciousness. This view of the self directly challenges the Hindu notion of the Atman, emphasizing the impermanence and interconnectedness of all phenomena. The ultimate goal in Buddhism is to break free from the cycle of Samsara by attaining Nirvana, a state of spiritual awakening and cessation of suffering, achieved through the realization of the true nature of reality and the cessation of clinging to the illusion of a permanent
In this two Christian philosophers, Richard Swinburne and Tim O'Connor, discussed the concept of neuroscience and the soul. The first philosopher, Swinburne, believed in the idea of substance dualism while O’Conner supported the argument for emergent individualism. Swinburne starts off by saying one’s physical body is simply the vehicle we interact with the world while the real essence of a person lies within their soul. When it comes to Swinburne’s belief on the soul after death I am reminded of Phaedo and how death will only bring about separation of body and soul.
It roots to our idea of the philosophy of life, in terms of reflection on our existence as humans and not only the contingence but the limitations thereof. Death encompasses the individual’s fundamental existence on the one hand and reshapes our concepts of its nature complementing one another in order to enlighten the idea of it. The manifestation of an individual to herself/himself is made probable by nothingness. The notion of spirituality and death in existentialism.
This meaning was very important and even vital, to the change from Vedic to Upanishads. The Vedic believed only priests could be spiritual masters. Upanishad states any person with the necessary experience can become a spiritual master. By discovering one’s inner self, known as atman, was something anyone could achieve.
What is life after death? Since the beginning of time, many people have wondered what happens after death. I chose to read and provide a synopsis of the chapter “Life After Death” by William L. Rowe. There are four main parts discussed in the chapter: the varieties of immortality, the meaningfulness of immortality, the case for immortality, and the case against immortality. By the end of this synopsis, I will explain a better understanding of whether or not we can believe there is life after death.
“This idea is partially included in most forms of religion, with early religions asserting that there is a life that follows death and creating elaborate stories about the nature of this afterlife. Eastern religions held to a more migrational notion – not so much an afterlife as the recycling of souls into new bodies,” (Furches, 2023). Which beg’s the question if our soul still exists after we die, depending on one’s beliefs this idea could rationalize the idea that some part of us still does go on and would justify everlasting
Karen Armstrong and Robert Thurman wrote their essays, “Homo religiosus” and “Wisdom”, respectively, describing two words, “being” and “void”. These words, although have opposite meanings, describe the same spiritual experience that come about through different means. By definition, “being” is a kind of fullness or completeness of existence and “void” is emptiness or a negation of existence. Armstrong believes that “being” is the equivalent of the Buddhist’s “Nirvana” while Thurman believes that “void” is the equivalent of the Buddhist’s “Nirvana”. Although these terms seem to be opposite in the literal sense of defining them, they lead to the same outcome: not being at the center of one’s own universe.
In “How the Ancient Religions Viewed the Afterlife,” author Patrick Kiger discusses the differences in the afterlife practices and beliefs of the ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and Rome. The religion of Mesopotamia had a very bleak outlook on death and regarded the afterlife in a negative light. They believed the underworld to be a hopeless place filled with corruption and torment, and that it would be necessary to bribe the gods, Ereshkigal and Nergal, that ruled over them in death. The author describes a poem that depicts a Mesopotamian king’s descent into the afterlife where he gifts the god's garments and weapons to secure a place for himself and be given the power to rule over dead soldiers and criminals. Even a king would have to persuade the deities that he is worthy enough to continue to rule in the afterworld.
Most importantly, it wants to open the door to Nirvana in order to escape from the six realms of existence. On the other hand, in Taoism, it aims to reach the immortal state and stress on performing exercises and ritual to improve physical health. In this essay, I will compare the views of life and death in Taoism and Buddhism and state two differences between them. Comparison and Contrast First of all, Daoism and Buddhism have different explanations and perspectives on reincarnation. In Daoism, the word ‘Dao’ means the path or the way.
Kevin Yuan Professor Ananda PHIL 101 16 July 2023 Chapter 3 Paper Who am I? What is the connection between our spirit and our body? What becomes of our souls after we die? These questions are important to human minds because they help people understand themselves better and develop their own meaning in life.
Despite a steady trading relationship, Mesopotamian and Egyptian societies have very dissimilar views on life and the afterlife. Indeed, Mesopotamian civilization certainly had much stricter views of life and the afterlife. This is likely a reflection of the frequent nature of wars and violence in this highly urbanized society (83). As a result, their views of the fragility of their mortality seemed to be pessimistically realistic. They seemed to accept that their gods gave them this life and nothing else.
In response to the long-standing philosophical question of immorality, many philosophers have posited the soul criterion, which asserts the soul constitutes personal identity and survives physical death. In The Myth of the Soul, Clarence Darrow rejects the existence of the soul in his case against the notion of immortality and an afterlife. His primary argument against the soul criterion is that no good explanation exists for how a soul enters a body, or when its beginning might occur. (Darrow 43) After first explicating Darrow 's view, I will present what I believe is its greatest shortcoming, an inconsistent use of the term soul, and argue that this weakness impacts the overall strength of his argument.
This allows us to complete the picture of God’s creation as manifested in a human soul which is incarnated. Here is the complete definition of spirit and matter as incarnated in a human form. As you can see, the Vedic thought has a complex definition of the statement, “God created man in His own image.” It explains it in detail.
In Jainism, humans consist of a soul (jiva) joint with bodily matter (ajiva). The bodily matter is believed to be what weighs the soul down and averts it from attaining spiritual perfection. This is clarified through the Jains’ doctrine of karma. (Brodd, et
Abhidharma and Madhyamaka use different conceptions of the Buddhist notion of two realities and truths. This notion posits an ultimate version of reality and truth, the realization of which leads to liberation from suffering. Abhidharma and Madhyamaka both accept this theory, but they approach it in different ways. This paper will outline approaches both schools take to interpret this notion. Following this, I will consider an Abhidharma objection to the approach of Madhyamaka and a response to that objection from Madhyamaka.
Throughout the years and even today people have different views or ideas about the afterlife. Some people based those ideas on their religion or just in a widely accepted idea within their civilization. But what all of these civilizations had in common was that their view in the afterlife was a necessary feature that would determine their way of living. The Israelites, Greeks, Indians all had different beliefs in the afterlife, yet all of them were ruled by their beliefs to tell them how to live life. The Israelites were a group of people from the Middle East that believed in the idea of there being just one God.